Skip to main content

Re/articulated Monstrosity: Mary and Her Creature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neo-Victorian Young Adult Narratives
  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most famous and well-examined authors in biofiction for young adults is Mary Godwin Shelley; such a focus on her life and works in the genre comes as no surprise when her most famous novel, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818), was written when Shelley was only eighteen or nineteen. The mythos surrounding Shelley’s life and her seminal text are, like her creature, revived in considerations in fiction and graphic novel form. Chapter 2 reads Antoinette May’s The Determined Heart (2015) and Lita Judge’s Mary’s Monster (2018) as texts that enact a kind of double vision, wherein they return to the historical past through Shelley and her creature to illuminate the connection between monstrosity and adolescence by framing Mary Godwin Shelley and/as her creature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin lived, respectively, April 27, 1759–September 10, 1797, and March 3, 1756–April 7, 1836.

  2. 2.

    According to Christine Hallett, puerperal fever “affected women within the first three days after childbirth and progressed rapidly, causing acute symptoms of severe abdominal pain, fever and debility” (2005, 1); in Wollstonecraft’s situation, infection most likely occurred when bacteria was introduced into the female reproductive tract after childbirth by the physician in attendance.

  3. 3.

    From 1814 onwards, Mary’s half-sister decided to use the name “Claire” and is how she will be referenced throughout this chapter.

  4. 4.

    Shelley was born on August 4, 1792, and died in unclear circumstances, by drowning, on August 4, 1792.

  5. 5.

    This elopement with a girl-child was not Shelley’s first; he had already seduced Harriet Westbrook when she was only sixteen and married her in Edinburgh on August 28, 1811. On June 23, 1813, Harriet gave birth to Eliza Ianthe Shelley. He remarried her in London to secure the rights to their child in March of 1814.

  6. 6.

    The lore of how the challenge to “each write a ghost story” occurred has been well rehearsed by scholars, but for the most accurate version according to Mary Shelley’s “Introduction” to the 1831 edition.

  7. 7.

    Other authors refer to neo-Gothicism, but they do not define the term; see Mary-Ellen Snodgrass (2011), Barbara Frey Waxman (1992), Lucian-Vasile Szabo and Marius-Mircea Crisan (2018) who evoke, but do not define, the term neo-Gothic.

  8. 8.

    The last few years have seen enquiries regarding these women such as renewed interest in Alcott’s sexuality in “Did the Mother of Young Adult Literature Identify as a Man?” (Thomas 2022), the film about the Brontë family To Walk Invisible (2015) and another about the middle sister, Emily (2022), and the TV series Dickinson (2019–2021). Most pertinent here is the biofictional film Mary Shelley (2017).

  9. 9.

    There are several tween and young adult adaptations of Poe’s life and tales including Eddie: The Lost Youth of Edgar Allan Poe (2012) by Scott Gustafson, Masque of the Red Death (2012) and The Fall (2014) by Bethany Griffin, The Raven’s Tale (2019) by Cat Winters, and His Hideous Heart (2019) edited by Dahlia Adler.

  10. 10.

    Frankenstein has been rewritten and adapted, loosely and otherwise, many times into comics and graphic novels (see Murray 2016) as well as other transmedia creations (see Friedman and Kavey 2016).

  11. 11.

    Edward Said has argued effectively, and pertinent to the argument here, that comics can defy “the ordinary processes of thought, which are policed, shaped and re-shaped by all sorts of pedagogical as well as ideological pressures…. I felt that comics freed me to think and imagine and see differently” (qtd in Whitlock 967).

  12. 12.

    According to vampire lore, a vampire must be invited in for the first time (Gelder 2002, 35).

  13. 13.

    Clara died of dysentery at the age of one, and William of malaria at three and a half (Seymour 2000, 214 and 231).

  14. 14.

    Ledore sees the historical questioning of Mary Shelley’s authorship as insulting and as a supposition that the text is “more assembled than written, an unnatural birth, as though all that the author had done were to piece together the writings of others, especially those of her father and her husband” as if “this enduring condescension, the idea of the author as a vessel for the ideas of other people—a fiction in which the author participated, so as to avoid the scandal of her own brain” (n.p.).

  15. 15.

    For an excellent critical discussion on the Gothic strain of anti-Catholicism in popular fiction, see Diane Long Hoeveler (2014); however, for seminal examples of such novels, see Matthew Lewis’ The Monk (1796/2016) and Ann Radcliffe’s The Italian (1797/2017).

  16. 16.

    F. W. Murnau’s silent German Expressionist film, Nosferatu (1922), was an unauthorised adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Gothic vampire novel, Dracula (1897/1997).

  17. 17.

    Other recent Gothic tales using this trope include The Somnambulist (2007) by Jonathan Barnes.

Bibliography

  • Abel, Hirsch and Langland Abel, eds. The Voyage In: Fictions of Female Development. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Dahlia, Ed. His Hideous Heart. New York: Flatiron, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, Anjana. “‘Frankenstein’ still speaks to very modern fears.” Financial Times January 15, 2018. n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldick, Chris. “Introduction.” The Oxford Book of Gothic Tales, edited by Chris Baldick, xi–xxiii, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Jonathan. The Somnambulist. London: Gollancz, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Fred and Catherine Spooner. “Introduction.” Monstrous Media/Spectral Subjects, 1–11. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, Kirsten. “Graphic Novels and the Girl Market.” CEA Critic. 72, no. 3 (2010): 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, Karen and Farran Norris Sands. “Growing up Frankenstein: Adaptations for Young Readers.” In The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein, edited by Andrew Smith, 241–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, Sean P. and Lissette Lopez Szwydky. “The Pre-Monstrous Mad Scientist and the Post-Nerd Smart Girl in Kenneth Oppel’s Frankenstein Series.” In Young Adult Gothic Fiction: Monstrous Selves/Monstrous Others, edited by Michelle J. Smith, Kristine Moruzi, 87–109. Montreal: McGill University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin-Molé, Megen. “‘Hail, Mary, the Mother of Science Fiction’: Popular Fictionalisations of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley in Film and Television, 1935–2018.” Science Fiction and Television 11, no. 2 (2018): 233–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson. Tuning Fork Productions, Apple TV+. November 1, 2019–December 24, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich, Lisa. “Being-becoming-monster: Mirrors and Mirroring in Graphic Frankenstein Narratives.Literature and Medicine 36, no. 2 (Fall 2018): 388–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emily. Embankments Films, Ingenious Media, Warner Bros. Pictures, September 9, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lester D. and Allison Kavey. Monstrous Progeny. New Brunswick: Rutgers, University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiman, Neil. “My Hero: Mary Shelley.” The Guardian. October 18, 2014, n.p. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/oct/18/my-hero-mary-shelley-neil-gaiman.

  • Gelder, Ken. Reading the Vampire. London: Routledge, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Bethany. Masque of the Red Death. New York: Greenwillow Books, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Bethany. The Fall. New York: Greenwillow Books, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, Scott. Eddie: The Lost Youth of Edgar Allan Poe. New York: Simon and Schuster Books, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, Christine. “The Attempt to Understand Puerperal Fever in the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries: The Influence of Inflammation Theory.” Medical History 49 (2005): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeveler, Diane Long. The Gothic Ideology: Religious Hysteria and Anti-Catholicism in British Popular Fiction, 1780–1880. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Kathryn. Death, Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Adolescent Literature. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, Lita. Mary’s Monster: Love, Madness, and How Mary Shelley Created Frankenstein. New York: Roaring Brook Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, C. Victoriana: Histories, Fictions, Criticism. New York: Columbia, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlke, Marie-Luise and Christian Gutleben. “The (Mis)Shapes of Neo-Victorian Gothic: Continuations, Adaptations, Transformations.” In The Neo-Victorian Gothic, edited by Kohlke and Gutleben, 1–48. Amsterdam: Rodopi/Brill, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlke, Marie-Luise. “Mining the Neo-Victorian Vein: Prospecting for Gold, Buried Treasure and Uncertain Metal.” In Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations, edited by Nadine Boehm-Schnitker and Susanne Gruss, 21–37. New York, Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Mackenzi. This Monstrous Thing. New York: Katherine Tegen Books, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Matthew. The Monk. London: Oxford University Press, 1796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Sarah E. “Portraits of the Girl-Child: Female Bildungsroman in Victorian Fiction.” Literature Compass 4, no. 1 (2007): 317–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Sarah E. “Dark Descen(den)ts: Neo-Gothic Monstrosity and the Women of Frankenstein.” In Neo-Gothic Narratives: Illusory Illusions of the Past, edited by Maier and Brenda Ayres, 23–40. London: Anthem, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, Sarah E. and Brenda Ayres, eds. Neo-Gothic Narratives: Illusory Illusions of the Past. London: Anthem, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Shelley. HanWay Films, BFI, Curzon Artificial Eye, September 9, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Antoinette. The Determined Heart. Seattle: Lake Union Publishing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, Robyn. Ideologies of Identity in Adolescent Fiction: The Dialogic Construction of Subjectivity. New York: Routledge, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, Andrew. “Young Adult Frankenstein.” In Transmedia Creatures: Frankenstein’s Afterlives, edited by Francesca Saggini and Anna Enrichetta Soccio, 219–32. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Donna. “Of Monsters and Men: Absent Mothers and Unnatural Children in the Gothic ‘Family Romance.’” Otherness: Essays and Studies. 4, no. 2 (2014): 105–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Christopher. “Frankenstein in Comics and Graphic Novels.” In The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein, edited by Andrew Smith, 219–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nosferatu. Prana Film, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Danel. “Introduction.” In 21st Century Gothic, edited by Danel Olson, xxi–xxxiii. Plymouth, UK: Scarecrow Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppel, Kenneth. This Dark Endeavour. Toronto: Harper Trophy Canada, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppel, Kenneth. Such Wicked Intent. Toronto: Harper Trophy Canada, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, Chris. Mister Creecher. London: Bloomsbury, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, June. Monstrous Bodies: Feminine Power in Young Adult Horror Fiction. Jefferson: McFarland Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, Ann. The Italian. London: Oxford University Press, 1797/2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, Ramona, and Sid Sondergard. “Biodepictions of Mary Shelley: The Romantic Woman Artist as Mother of Monsters.” In Biofictions, edited by Martin Middeke and Werner Huber, 201–13. New York: Camden House, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, Fiona. “Frankenstein at 200—Why Hasn’t Mary Shelley Been Given the Respect She Deserves?” The Guardian. January 13, 2018: n.p. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jan/13/frankenstein-at-200-why-hasnt-mary-shelley-been-given-the-respect-she-deserves-?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other.

  • Sedgwick, Marcus. The Monsters We Deserve. Brookline: Zephyr Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, Miranda. Mary Shelley. London: John Murray, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. The Original 1818 Text, 3rd ed., edited by D. L. MacDonald and Kathleen Scherf. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovron, Jon. Man Made Boy. New York: Penguin Juvenile, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, Mary Ellen. “Michel Faber, Feminism, and the Neo-Gothic Novel: The Crimson Petal and The White.” In 21st Century Gothic, edited by Daniel Olson, 111–23. Plymouth, UK: Scarecrow Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spark, Muriel. Mary Shelley. London: Cardinal, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, Catherine. “‘The Gothic is part of history, just as history is part of the Gothic’: Gothicizing History and Historicizing the Gothic in Celia Rees’ Young Adult Fiction.” In New Directions in Children’s Gothic: Debatable Lands, edited by Anna Jackson, 132–46. London: Routledge, 2017.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Bram. Dracula. 1897. Ed. Glennis Byron. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, Lucian-Vasile, and Marius-Mircea Crisan. “Technological Modifications of the Human Body in Neo-Gothic Literature: Prostheses, Hybridization and Cyborgization in Posthumanism.” Caietele Echinox Journal 35 (2018): 147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Peyton. “Did the Mother of Young Adult Literature Identify as a Man?” The New York Times. December 24, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/24/opinion/did-the-mother-of-young-adult-literature-identify-as-a-man.html.

  • To Walk Invisible. BBC Cymru Wales, Lookout Point, The Open University, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, Barbara Frey. “Postexisentialism in the Neo-Gothic Mode: Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire.Mosaic 25, no. 3 (Summer 1992): 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyn, Suzanne. Dr. Frankenstein’s Daughters. New York: Scholastic, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Kirsten. The Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein. New York: Delacorte Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, Gillian. “Autographics: The Seeing ‘I’ of the Comics.” MFS Modern Fiction Studies 52, no. 4 (Winter 2006): 965–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Cat. The Raven’s Tale. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, Gina. “Gothic and Young Adult Literature: Werewolves, Vampires, Monsters, Rebellion, Broken Hearts and True Romance.” In The Edinburgh Companion to Gothic and the Arts, edited by David Punter, 378–92. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, Mary. Vindication of the Rights of Woman. 1792. London: Penguin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Maier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maier, S.E. (2024). Re/articulated Monstrosity: Mary and Her Creature. In: Neo-Victorian Young Adult Narratives . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47295-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics