Abstract
In the twenty-first century, employees are increasingly far from the process of real product creation, or in terms of classical political economy, alienated from labor. At the same time, in terms of neo-institutional economics, the modern employee tends to behave opportunistically toward the firm and the employer. Both the employees’ alienation and their opportunism negatively affect labor productivity. On a theoretical level, these phenomena are related. However, the critical question is—how is it possible to identify this relation at the empirical level, and what are the features of this relation? The paper aims to answer the question: are alienation and behavioral opportunism interconnected on data from a survey of 300 Russian employees conducted in October 2020? The study used ANOVA to test hypotheses about the relationship of these phenomena for different groups. The positive interconnection of behavioral opportunism and alienation is confirmed. The most alienated were employees with the willingness to passive opportunism. Factors obliterating the differences between alienation and employee opportunism were managerial position of an employee, capital place of life (Moscow), salary, or position improvement in the near past. Top- and HR managers can use the research results to increase employee involvement and labor productivity growth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achrol RS, Gundlach GT (1999) Legal and social safeguards against opportunism in exchange. J Retail 75(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80006-2
Akhtar S, Shaukat K (2016) Impact of petty tyranny on alienation from work: role of self-esteem and power-distance. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 17(3):275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-016-0126-4
Ashforth BE (1989) The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 43(2):207–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90051-4
Dahlstrom R, Nygaard A (1999) An empirical investigation of ex post transaction costs in franchised distribution channels. J Mark Res 36:160–170
Durrah O (2020) Injustice perception and work alienation: exploring the mediating role of employee’s cynicism in healthcare sector. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 7(9):811–824. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.811
Gaski JF, Ray NM (2001) Measurement and modeling of alienation in the distribution channel: implications for supplier-reseller relations. Ind Mark Manage 30(2):207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00146-2
Harding N (2013) On being at work: the social construction of the employee, pp 1–204. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559031
Helm AE, Moulard JG, Richins M (2015) Consumer cynicism: developing a scale to measure underlying attitudes influencing marketplace shaping and withdrawal behaviours. Int J Consum Stud 39(5):515–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12191
Lee D-J (1998) Developing international strategic alliances between exporters and importers: the case of Australian exporters. Int J Res Mark 15(4):335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00010-X
Nair N, Vohra N (2010) An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Manag Decis 48(4):600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011041373
Pletnev D, Kozlova E (2020) Towards evaluation of alienation and behavioral opportunism of enterprises and corporations workers. St. Petersb State Polytech Univ J Econ 13(3):141–157. https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.13311
Rokkan AI, Heide JB, Wathne KH (2003) Specific investments in marketing relationships: expropriation and bonding effects. J Mark Res 40(2):210–224. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.2.210.19223
Seggie S, Griffith D, Jap S (2013) Passive and active opportunism in interorganizational exchange. J Mark 77(6):73–90. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0529
Usman M, Ali M, Yousaf Z, Anwar F, Waqas M, Khan MAS (2020) The relationship between laissez-faire leadership and burnout: mediation through work alienation and the moderating role of political skill. Can J Adm Sci 37(4):423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1568
Wathne K, Heide J (2000) Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. J Mark 64:36–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.36.18070
Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York
Zhang G, Chan A, Zhong J, Yu X (2016) Creativity and social alienation: the costs of being creative. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27(12):1252–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1072107
Acknowledgements
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-010-00653.
Ethical Statement
The authors of this paper confirm that they have gained all the necessary permissions from the human subjects involved in this study to use their information. Furthermore, all individual information presented in this study has been anonymized. This study was approved by the Committee of Ethics of the Chelyabinsk State University 35-72-10/06/2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pletnev, D., Kozlova, E. (2024). Employee’s Opportunism as an Alienation Manifest in Russian Firms. In: Prostean, G.I., Lavios, J.J., Brancu, L., Şahin, F. (eds) Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Challenging Global Times. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47164-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47164-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47163-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47164-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)