Abstract
Organizational crises management in many cases relies on ad hoc created teams to handle these unexpected events. Due to the demanded short reaction time, there is pressure on all persons involved in handling the situation. Crisis management team members instinctively search for the “best possible outcome” of the crisis mostly based on their professional background. Some of the individual professional goals are conflicting, and conciliation might be necessary. Ultimately, each of the apparently conflicting professional goals points to the same organizational goal: the resilience after the crisis. Our findings are based on a survey done at some Eastern European multinational organizations. In the paper we not only provide arguments for multidisciplinary crisis management teams, but also show that crisis managers sometimes have concerns about the time-consuming reconciliation of the goals and the one-track-minded approach of some professionals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arpan LM, Roskos-Ewoldsen DR (2005) Stealing thunder: analysis of the effects of proactive disclosure of crisis information. Public Relat Rev 31(3):425–433
Bakos L, Dumitrașcu DD (2017) Holonic crisis handling model for corporate sustainability. Sustainability 9:2266
Bakos L, Dumitrașcu DD, Harangus K (2019) Human factor preparedness for decentralized crisis management and communication in cyber-physical systems. Sustainability 11:6676
Barton L (2001) Crisis in organizations II, 2nd edn. College Divisions South-Western, Cincinnati, OH
Cannon W (1932) Wisdom of the body. W.W. Norton & Company, United States
Claeys A-S (2017) Better safe than sorry: why organizations in crisis should never hesitate to steal thunder. Bus Horiz 60:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.01.003
Coombs WT (2007) Crisis management and communications. Institute for Public Relations
Donahue JJ (2020) Fight-flight-freeze system. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK (eds) Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, pp 1590–1595
Ebersberger B, Kuckertz A (2021) Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis. J Bus Res 124:126–135
Flyverbom M, Leonardi PM, Stohl C, Stohl M (2016) The management of visibilities in the digital age. Int J Commun 10:98–109
Hernandez JGV, Ortega RP (2019) Bounded rationality in decision-making. MOJ Res Rev 2(1):1–8
Minton EA, Khale LR (2014) Belief systems, religion, and behavioral economics. Business Expert Press LLC, New York
Pauchant JB, Mitroff I (1992) Transforming the crisis-prone organization: preventing individual, organizational, and environmental tragedies. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Pearson C, Clair J (1998) Reframing crisis management. Acad Manag Rev 23(1):59–76
Puthentara M (2012) Perspectives of public relations. DC Books, India
Sent EM (2018) Rationality and bounded rationality: you can’t have one without the other. Eur J Hist Econ Thought 25(6):1370–1386
Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality. Economic analysis and public policy. Behav Econ Bus Organ 2:478–505
Ethical Statement
The authors of this paper confirm that they have gained all the necessary permissions from the human subjects involved in this study to use their information. Furthermore, all individual information presented in this study has been anonymized.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sapientia University (registered under 36455-15 June 2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bakos, L., Dumitrașcu, DD. (2024). Contradictions of Objectives During Organizational Crisis. In: Prostean, G.I., Lavios, J.J., Brancu, L., Şahin, F. (eds) Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Challenging Global Times. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47164-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47164-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47163-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47164-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)