Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Augmented Reality, Transmonumentalism and the Concept of Open Style in Architecture on the Example of the Ensemble of Freedom Square in Kharkiv

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Technologies in Urban Engineering (STUE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 808))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

The paper analyzes the problems of preserving the historical originality of the urban environment, its stylistically established architectural ensembles in the context of the creation of “smart cities”. How to combine traditional and innovative forms of urban art, such as augmented reality. The purpose of this article is to trace the implementation of the idea of an open style on the material of the development of the architectural environment of the city center of Kharkiv—the ensemble of Freedom Square—and to introduce the concept of transmonumentalism into scientific circulation as the implementation of this style in modern conditions. The concept of an open modern style is unfolding today in the context of the formation of a new digital technological order. This new way of life is organically assimilated by the concept of an open style. It is free from traditional style constants. It allows you to create an environment that incorporates innovation. The aesthetic value of such an environment is enhanced by the new communication capabilities of media technologies. The style's potential remains open to future innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lobo T (2021) The techne and poiesis of urban life-forms. In: Nagenborg M et al (eds) Technology and the city. POET, vol 36. Springer, Cham, pp 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_3

  2. Perticarini M, Marzocchella V (2021) 3D animation applied to street art. Physical and remote connections aimed at inclusion. In: Cheng LY (ed) ICGG 2020—proceedings of the 19th international conference on geometry and graphics, ICGG 2021. AISC, vol 1296. Springer, Cham, pp 920–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63403-2_85

  3. Quintero H, Aguilera N, Ramirez P, Hosseini S (2019) Synergy of digital art, architecture and design using video-mapping in a combined classroom. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on virtual and augmented reality in education (VARE 2019). DIME Università di Genova, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2019.vare.001

  4. Olenina O, Protsenko O, Pichuhina Y (2022) The status of art in the modern digital space. Culture of Ukraine, vol 78, pp 18–30. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.078.02

  5. Barros V, Oliveira E, de Araújo LF (2021) Digital poetry circuit: methodology for cultural applications with AR in public spaces. In: Ahram T, Taiar R, Groff F (eds) Human interaction, emerging technologies and future applications IV. IHIET-AI 2021. AISC, vol 1378. Springer, Cham, pp 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74009-2_19

  6. Gwilt I, Wilde J (2022) Augmented reality graffiti and street art. In: Geroimenko V (ed) Augmented reality art. SSCC. Springer, Cham, pp 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96863-2_15

  7. Sanaeipoor S, Emami KH (2020) Smart city: exploring the role of augmented reality in placemaking. In: 2020 4th international conference on smart city, internet of things and applications (SCIOT). IEEE, pp 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/sciot50840.2020.9250204

  8. Tritthart M (2021) Animated urban surfaces: spatial augmented reality in public discourse. Int J Film Media Arts 6(2):75–94. https://doi.org/10.24140/ijfma.v6.n2.05

  9. Leorke D, Owens M (2020) Games and play in the creative, smart and ecological city. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007760

  10. Afonso AG, Fatah gen Schieck A (2020) Play in the smart city context: exploring interactional, bodily, social and spatial aspects of situated media interfaces. Behav Inf Technol 39(6):656–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1693630

  11. Fomenko OO, Danylov SM, Izbash AM (2020) Problems of architecture and professional development of an architect beyond “Limits to Growth”. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 907, p 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/907/1/012017

  12. Gryglewski P, Chernyshev D, Kashchenko O et al (2021) Between practice and theory: comments on the specificity of art history and art education in Poland and Ukraine. Art Inq 23:168–190. https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2021/23/10

  13. Fomenko O, Danylov S, Sleptcov O, Izbash A (2020) The problem of formation of innovative directions in the profession “Architect”. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 907, p 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/907/1/012018

  14. Shokrani M, Minaei S, Moradi M, Omidvar S (2021) Designing an AR Urban game (HAMAJA) for increasing engagement in city. Media Arch Bienn 20:184–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469410.3469429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, He H, Cheng X (2018) Rethink of urban arts: AR technology with participatory experience of new urban arts. In: Marcus A, Wang W (eds) Design, user experience, and usability: users, contexts and case studies. DUXU 2018. LNISA, vol 10920. Springer, Cham, pp 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91806-8_39

  16. Casimiro GG (2019) Urban noises: augmented reality and urban art workshop. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on pervasive displays, Article no. 41. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3329678

  17. Rossi D (2019) SAR for kids: spatial augmented reality as tool for art education. In: Luigini A (ed) Proceedings of the 1st international and interdisciplinary conference on digital environments for education, arts and heritage. EARTH 2018. AICS, vol 919. Springer, Cham, pp 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12240-9_38

  18. Nam YT, Oh JH (2016) Participatory mixed reality space: collective memories. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, pp 353–354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0118

  19. Di Brita T (2019) The disappearance/virtualisation of graffiti and street art. SAUC—street art and urban creativity 5(2):6–17. https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v5i2.168

  20. Arvatov BI (1922) On the way to proletarian art. Press and revolution 1:65–75 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ginzburg MY (1975) Style and era. In: Masters of soviet architecture on architecture, vol 2. Art, Moscow, pp 279–299 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shilo AV (2008) Issues of style and method in the theory and practice of constructivism. Artist Culture Actual Probl 5:461–494 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shilo AV (2014) Modern style. In: Encyclopedia of the Russian avant-garde, vol 2. Global Expert & Service Team, Moscow, pp 232–233 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lissitzky LM (1975) The blockade of russia ends. In: Masters of soviet architecture on architecture, vol 2. Art, Moscow, pp 137–139 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldzamt E (1973) William Morris and the social origins of modern architecture. Stroyizdat, Moscow [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khan-Magomedov SO (1982) The psychoanalytic method of N. Ladovsky is the basis of the propaedeutic discipline “Space” in VKHUTEMAS-VKHUTEIN. Technical aesthetics, vol 4, pp 27–32 [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rychkov P (2008) Kharkov as a capital of Soviet-Ukrainian constructivism. TEKA Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiow Krajobrazowych 4:116–133

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chehunov NV, Dubovis GA (2004) House of state industry. Time. fate. Caravel, Kharkiv [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Novikov FA (2006) Architects and architecture. URSS, Moscow [in Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Song S, Zhong Y (2021) Exploration of interactive urban sculpture based on augmented reality. In: Sugumaran V, Xu Z, Zhou H (eds) Application of intelligent systems in multi-modal information analytics. MMIA 2020. AISC, vol 1233. Springer, Cham, pp 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51431-0_63

  31. Ponomarenko I (2023) Roman Minin presents a manifesto of transmonumentalism and the first work in this genre “LOVE”. https://www.facebook.com/ivan.ponomarenko1/posts/pfbid02xq1U2MgKa4YWRDaCCBkafxuT2edxkSqYrETJXWXRxNXxqGYFJByGwqUTj9qFexSnl. Accessed 10 May 2023

  32. Ponomarenko I (2023) New street art by Roman Minin. https://www.facebook.com/ivan.ponomarenko1/posts/pfbid0GfzbVnBV5HL2mebffbmmU8esfBJpz8GShX4XuZDaZYsAt5VhqhiSHocJZaUAAtf3l. Accessed 10 May 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, 17 Marshala Bazhanova Street, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine

    Olena Olenina & Oleksandr Shilo

Authors
  1. Olena Olenina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oleksandr Shilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olena Olenina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Olga Arsenyeva

  2. A. Pidhornyi Institute of Mechanical Engineering Problems of the National Academy of Sciences, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Tetyana Romanova

  3. O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Maria Sukhonos

  4. O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Ihor Biletskyi

  5. O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Yevgen Tsegelnyk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Olenina, O., Shilo, O. (2023). Augmented Reality, Transmonumentalism and the Concept of Open Style in Architecture on the Example of the Ensemble of Freedom Square in Kharkiv. In: Arsenyeva, O., Romanova, T., Sukhonos, M., Biletskyi, I., Tsegelnyk, Y. (eds) Smart Technologies in Urban Engineering. STUE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 808. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46877-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation