Abstract
In many business environments, we find extensive business process structures that consist of many individual processes, each with a complex composition of activities. The elements in the processes are often based on an ad-hoc, existing way of working, which is not always properly documented. The processes evolve over time, not rarely on a per-process basis. Consequently, process definitions diverge and the use of process elements within and between process definitions becomes misaligned. To address this issue, we propose the use of catalogs of standardized process building blocks in business process engineering. Different from approaches using patterns, we base our catalogs on foundational parts (which we call primitives) organized in three dimensions: business process activities, objects manipulated by activities, and actors performing activities – starting with the semantics of processes, not the syntax. To provide a solid basis for the structuring of each of the dimensions (and hence the organization of the foundational parts in the catalogs), we use taxonomies. In this paper, we discuss the development of these taxonomies. We apply a slightly modified existing taxonomy development method, which uses both deductive and inductive steps. We discuss the development of one taxonomy in detail, basing the inductive steps on processes from a complex, real-world case organization. In doing so, we make a first step towards a business process engineering approach that is centered on a process-content-first point of view, aligned with the needs of the process management practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14, 5–51 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022883727209
Van der Aalst, W.: Process Mining, Data Science in Action. Springer, Berlin (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)
Beerepoot, I., et al.: The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die. Comput. Ind. 146, 103837 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103837
vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Handbook on Business Process Management 2. IHIS, Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4
Vom Brocke J.: towards process science: embracing interdisciplinary research opportunities in the digital age. In: Keynote Speech BPM Conference, Seville, Spain (2020)
Chang, J.F.: Business Process Management Systems. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2016)
Ching, F.: Architecture, Form, Space & Order. John Wiley, New York (1996)
Davis, F.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986)
Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.: Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 129–158 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2014.928951
Dumas, M., LaRosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
Erens, F.: The Synthesis of Variety: Structuring Product Families. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (1996)
Fellmann, M., et al.: A taxonomy and catalog of business process model patterns. In: Proceedings 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, Article No. 19, pp. 1–10. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3147704.3147725
Glass, R., Vessey, I.: Contemporary application-domain taxonomies. IEEE Softw. 12(4), 63–76 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/52.391837
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems. Springer, New York (2010)
Kundish, D., et al.: An update for taxonomy designers: methodological guidance from information systems research. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 64(4), 421–439 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00723-x
Lincoln, M., Gal, A.: Searching business process repositories using operational similarity. In: Proceedings on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2011, pp. 2–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25109-2_2
Mwilu, O., Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Taxonomy development for complex emerging technologies. In: Proceedings 19th Asia-Pacific Conference on Information System (2015)
Nickerson, R., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. of Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26
Mannaert, H.: Normalized systems: towards designing evolvable modular structures. In: Proceedings 7th International Conference on Software Engineering Advance (2012)
March, S., Smith, G.: Design and natural science research on Information Technology. Decis. Supp. Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
McKnight, D., Chervany, N.: What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 6(2), 35–59 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235
Miller, J., Rohm, A.: A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Manag. Sci. 40(3), 285–304 (1994)
Oosterhout, M. van: Business Agility and Information Technology in Service. ERIM PhD Series in Research in Management 198. Erasmus University, Rotterdam (2010)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Man. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Soetekouw, A., Grefen, P., Turetken, O., Vanderfeesten, I.: A mass customization approach to business process modularization. In: Proceedings IEEE 23rd Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 29–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI52690.2021.10052
Steen, M., Akehurst, D., ter Doest, H., Lankhorst, M.: Supporting viewpoint-oriented enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings 8th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 201–211. IEEE, Piscataway (2004)
Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Refactoring large process models. Comput. Ind. 62, 5 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.012
Zhang, Z., et al.: A novel complex manufacturing business process decomposition approach in cloud manufacturing. Comput Ind. Eng. 144, 106442 (2020)
Acknowledgments
The colleagues at Rijkswaterstaat (RWS) are thanked for their positive cooperation in the execution of the research reported in this paper. Jan Veraart of TUE is thanked for his assistance in the analysis of the RWS case.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Soetekouw, T., Grefen, P., Vanderfeesten, I., Turetken, O. (2024). Developing Taxonomies for Business Process Engineering. In: Proper, H.A., Pufahl, L., Karastoyanova, D., van Sinderen, M., Moreira, J. (eds) Enterprise Design, Operations, and Computing. EDOC 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46587-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46587-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46586-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46587-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)