Skip to main content

The Sympoietic Orchard: Everyday Ways of Co-creating an Orchard

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
At the Frontiers of Everyday Life

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

What can sympoiesis look like in the dappled light of an urban orchards’ everyday life? This chapter is an agripoetic inquiry in search of a sympoietic approach to orchard-making in a twenty-first century urban context. “Sympoiesis” is a twice-born neologism first forged by Dempster B: In: Allen JK and Wilby J (ed) Proceedings of the world congress of the systems sciences and ISSS), (2000) and then Haraway D: Staying With the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene, (2016) from the prefix sym (with) and the Greek root of poetry, poiesis (making). Sympoiesis is a way to name multispecies creation or (world)making. I will describe three approaches to sympoietic orchard-making I experimented in a communal orchard south of Paris: visiting, prolonging, and gardening possibilities. These immersive methods are not protocols I applied during fieldwork, but rather practices, or even postures, I came to embody in contact with the orchard, and then to name, with the help of orchard writing from poetry collections and gardening books, and in conversation with landscape thinkers such as Gilles Clément or Jean-Marc Besse and multispecies theorists in biology, ethology, philosophy, critical geography, and literature, including Donna Haraway, Vinciane Despret, Isabelle Stengers, Emanuele Coccia, Frédérique Aït Touati, and Marielle Macé.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The AEV was founded in October 1976, by the same law which instituted the region of Ile-de-France. Its original mission was to protect green spaces in Ile-de-France. After a decade of reconstruction in the 1960s, there was a growing consciousness that urbanization and other forms of development endangered the regions’ rich biodiversity. Starting in the 1990s, the AEV expanded this mission to include farmland, ear marking a part of the properties it pre-empted for agriculture. The parcel the orchard is planted on is in an agricultural zone, and in its original bid, Au 36 stressed the historical precedents of orchards in the region surrounding Paris. For more on this, see Quellier (2003) Des fruits et des hommes. L’arboriculture fruitière en Île de France (vers 1600-vers 1800). Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes

  2. 2.

    Au36 Cabaret des cultures is a not-for-profit organization founded by Mariane Frisch, a French ceramist and activist, in 2008 in Leuville-Sur-Orge, a small town on the other side of the Orge from Brétigny, the Orge being a small river. Au36 was originally dedicated to organizing cultural events, with increasingly ecological tendencies. In 2015, Au36 morphed when Mariane Frisch and another member, Carol Williamson, a gardener and landscape designer, co-founded the orchard in Brétigny-Sur-Orge.

  3. 3.

    The Foundation for Nature and Mankind was founded in the 1990s, and funds grassroots projects to protect the environment and combat climate change.

  4. 4.

    « Orchard entanglement » is an expression I borrow from the title of Emily Didier Reisman’s 2020 doctoral dissertation at UC Santa Cruz, «Orchard Entanglements: Political Ecologies of Almond Production in California and Spain». I find the term particularly well chosen, in that it is both evocative of a tangle of branches or roots, but also of the less visual social entanglements knotting orchard dwellers together.

  5. 5.

    A phrase the Italian philosopher Emanuele Coccia borrowed from Donald Rumsfeld in his 2020 class at the EHESS, “La nature contemporaine”, to qualify our ignorance of our ignorance of what we call nature, masked by the taxonomic aspiration to exhaustively name discrete entities.

  6. 6.

    See, amongst others, Stefan Sobkowiak’s YouTube channel: Le verger permaculturel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-fKD72AtioxXV2C9oZf6ZQ); Orian T, Beyond the war on invasive species: a permacultural approach to ecosystem restauration, Chelsea green publishing, 2015; Leterme E, La biodiversité, amie du verger, Arles, Ed. Rouergue, 2018.

References

  • Abram D (1996) The Spell of the Sensuous. Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. Penguin Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arènes A. Grégoire A and Aît-Touati F (2019) Terra forma: manuel de cartographies potentielles. Éditions B42, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard G (1947) La Terre et les rêveries de la volonté. Corti, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Besse J-M (2018) La nécessité du paysage. Parenthèses, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément G (2009) Le salon des Berces. NiL editions, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford J (1996) Anthropology and/as travel. Etnofoor Jaarg. 9(2):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Coccia E (2010) La vie sensible. Payot & Rivages, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1995) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W. W. Norton & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey J, Pratt G (2019) Wiggle room. In: Antipode editorial collective (ed) keywords in radical geography: antipode at 50, p 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558071.ch51

  • Dempster B (2000) Sympoietic and autopoietic systems: a new distinction for self-organizing systems. In: Allen JK and Wilby J (ed) Proceedings of the world congress of the systems sciences and ISSS

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (2003) The companion species manifesto: dogs. Prickly Paradigms Press, Chicago, People and Significant Otherness

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (2016) Staying with the trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley A (2019) Haraway’s material-semiotic knot: a learning-teaching response for creative-critical times. a/b: Auto/Biogr Stud 34:539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2019.1664139

  • Ingold T (2000), The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazic D (2022) Quand les plantes n'en font qu'à leur tête. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Macé M (2016) Styles. Critique de nos formes de vie. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Macé M (2019) Nos cabanes. Verdier, Lagrasse

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N (2019) From Edenic apocalypse to gardens against Eden: plants and people in and after the Anthropocene. In: Kregg Hetherington (ed) Infrastructure, environment, and life in the anthropocene, Duke University Press, p 115–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002567-007

  • Pollan M (2002) The Botany of Desire: a plant's-eye view of the world. Random House Publishing Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa M (2015) Making time for soil: technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Soc Stud Sci 45(5):691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851

  • Puig de la Bellacasa M (2017) Matters of care: speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Quellier F (2003) Des fruits et des hommes, l’arboriculture fruitière en île de France (vers 1600 et vers 1800). Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reisman ED (2020) Orchard Entanglements: political ecologies of almond production in California and Spain. UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilke R.M (1925/2019) Vergers. Le bruit du temps, Caslon

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival L (1993) The growth of family trees: understanding Huaorani perceptions of the forest. Man (N.S.) 28:635–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival L (2014) Encountering nature through fieldwork: expert knowledge, modes of reasoning, and local creativity. J Roy Anthropol Inst. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sack RD (1986) Human territoriality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Its Theory and History

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers I, Despret V (2011) Les Faiseuses d’histoires: que font les femmes à la pensée? La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern M (2004) Partial connections. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassin J (2020) Pour une écologie du sensible. Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bronwyn Louw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Louw, B. (2023). The Sympoietic Orchard: Everyday Ways of Co-creating an Orchard. In: Gülen, H., Sungur, C., Yeşilyurt, A. (eds) At the Frontiers of Everyday Life. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46580-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics