Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Enclaves
  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

Today, digital personal data has become the defining resource for our societies and economies. Unfortunately, our personal data are increasingly concentrated in the hands of a small number of digital technology businesses often called Big Tech. The past decade has been defined by the rise of Big Tech as the dominant social players in our societies, and much of their rise and dominance is down to their control over our personal data. Big Tech has created a series of data enclaves that entrench their power and dominance, limiting the capacity of other businesses to compete in technoscientific capitalism. In building their data enclaves, Big Tech has engaged in a parasitic form of innovation, developing digital technologies designed to limit access to resources, to undermine regulations or social conventions, to undermine or avoid competition, to exploit customers psychology, to lock customers into using a product, to stop customers fixing their own property, or to use information asymmetries to treat customers inequitably. The contention of this book is that we need to rethink data governance in order to address the growing paradoxes and problems engendered by the market and social power of Big Tech.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Birch, K. (2023) Yet another subscription fee: Twitter, Facebook, Netflix are desperate and dying, The Globe and Mail—Report on Business (10 Apr).

  2. 2.

    Laney, D. (2020) Your company’s data may be worth more than your company, Forbes (22 July).

  3. 3.

    WEF (2011) Personal Data: The Emergence of a New Asset Class, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

  4. 4.

    https://www.gartner.com/en/industries/education.

  5. 5.

    Lanier, J. (2014) Who Owns the Future? New York: Simon & Schuster.

  6. 6.

    For ease, I will use “Alphabet/Google” and “Meta/Facebook” throughout this book, although readers should note that Alphabet Inc. was established in 2015, subsuming Google Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc. was established in 2021, replacing Facebook Inc.

  7. 7.

    Birch, K. and Cochrane, D.T. (2022) Big Tech: Four emerging forms of digital rentiership, Science as Culture 31(1): 44–58; and Hendrikse, R., Adriaans, I., Klinge, T. and Fernandez, R. (2022) The Big Techification of everything, Science as Culture 31(1): 59–71.

  8. 8.

    Prainsack, B. (2019) Data donation: How to resist the iLeviathan, in J. Krutzinna and L. Floridi (eds.), The Ethics of Medical Data Donation, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 9–22; and Birch, K. and Bronson, K. (2022) Big Tech, Science as Culture 31(1): 1–14.

  9. 9.

    Srnicek, N. (2016) Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 6.

  10. 10.

    Birch, K. and Cochrane, D.T. (2022) Big Tech: Four emerging forms of digital rentiership, Science as Culture 31(1), p. 45; also see Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D., Wiesche, M., Bohm, M. and Krcmar, H. (2020) Digital platform ecosystems, Electronic Markets 30: 87–98.

  11. 11.

    Birch, K. and Cochrane, D.T. (2022) Big Tech: Four emerging forms of digital rentiership, Science as Culture 31(1): 44–58.

  12. 12.

    https://www.economist.com/briefing/2022/01/22/what-americas-largest-technology-firms-are-investing-in.

  13. 13.

    Kenney, M. and Zysman, J. (2019) Unicorns, cheshire cats, and the new dilemmas of entrepreneurial finance, Venture Capital, 21(1), pp. 35–50; and Pfotenhauer, S., Laurent, B., Papageorgiou, K. and Stilgoe, J. (2022) The politics of scaling, Social Studies of Science 52(1): 3–34.

  14. 14.

    Sadowski, J. (2020) The internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism, Antipode 52(2): 562–580.

  15. 15.

    Galloway, S. (2018) The Four, New York: Portfolio/Penguin.

  16. 16.

    https://www.economist.com/news/2013/11/18/the-coming-tech-lash.

  17. 17.

    https://www.humanetech.com/key-issues.

  18. 18.

    Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism, New York: PublicAffairs.

  19. 19.

    US House of Representatives (2020) Investigation of Competition in Digital Markets, Washington, DC: House of Representatives.

  20. 20.

    https://www.economist.com/briefing/2022/01/22/what-americas-largest-technology-firms-are-investing-in; and Hellman J. (2022) Big Tech’s ‘voracious appetite’ or entrepreneurs who dream of acquisition? Regulation and the interpenetration of corporate scales, Science as Culture 31(1): 149–161.

  21. 21.

    One example of this are the billions of dollars that Meta/Facebook has invested in the ‘Metaverse’, including investments in virtual, augmented, and extended reality; they have recently backpedaled to focus on artificial intelligence, https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/15/tech/meta-ai-investment-priority/index.html.

  22. 22.

    Birch, K., Chiappetta, M. and Artyushina, A. (2020) The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: Data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset, Policy Studies 41(5): 468–487.

  23. 23.

    With and without colleagues, I’ve discussed the notion of rentiership at some length across a range of publications, including: Birch, K. (2017) A Research Agenda for Neoliberalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; Birch, K. (2020) Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism, Science, Technology and Human Values 45(1): 3–33; Birch, K. and Cochrane, D.T. (2022) Big Tech: Four emerging forms of digital rentiership, Science as Culture 31(1): 44–58; Birch, K., Ward, C. and Tretter, E. (2022) Introduction: New frontiers of techno-economic rentiership, Competition and Change 26(3–4): 407–414; and Birch, K. and Ward, C. (2023) Introduction: Critical approaches to rentiership, Environment and Planning A.

  24. 24.

    https://www.choice.com.au/consumers-and-data/data-collection-and-use/how-your-data-is-used/articles/consumers-international-tinder-investigation.

  25. 25.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/hp-printers-computers-ink-cartridges-rivals/.

  26. 26.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/11/techscape-zirp-tech-boom.

  27. 27.

    https://www.theinformation.com/articles/apple-amazon-google-and-facebook-face-at-least-70-antitrust-probes-cases.

  28. 28.

    Birch, K. (2023) There are no markets anymore: From neoliberalism to Big Tech, State of Power 2023 Report, The Transnational Institute (3 Feb): https://www.tni.org/en/article/there-are-no-markets-anymore.

  29. 29.

    Mirowski, P. and Nik-Khah, E. (2017) The Knowledge We Lost in Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press; and Viljoen, S., Goldenfein, J. and McGuigan, L. (2021) Design choices: Mechanism design and platform capitalism, Big Data & Society 8(2): https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211034312.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kean Birch .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Birch, K. (2023). Introduction. In: Data Enclaves. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46402-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46402-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46402-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics