Skip to main content

Digital Image Quality Descriptors and Performance Characteristics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
X-Ray Imaging Systems for Biomedical Engineering Technology
  • 225 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter first introduces three characteristics of a digital image, including the matrix, the pixel, and the bit depth. Three important descriptors in digital image quality are spatial resolution, contrast resolution, and noise. While spatial resolution refers to the imaging system to show detail or sharpness, contrast resolution describes the ability of the imaging system to show differences in tissue contrast on the image (image contrast). Noise on the other hand refers to the grainy or mottle appearance of the image due to the number of photons used to create the image. Fewer photons will produce more noise (quantum noise). Finally, performance characteristics of digital detectors are introduced such as the point spread function (PSF), the edge spread function (ESP), the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Of these four characteristics, only the DQE was described as it is an important metric used to describe the noise characteristics of a digital detector and has practical implications in clinical imaging. Finally, the notion of image artifacts arising from several sources, including the detector, software, and the object being imaged, was introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lanca L, Silva A. Digital imaging systems for plain radiography. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bushong S. Radiologic science for technologists. 12th ed. Saint Louis: Elsevier; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seeram E. Digital radiography: physical principles and quality control. 2nd ed. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Yorkston J. Flat-panel DR detectors for radiography and fluoroscopy. In: Goldman L, Yester MV, editors. Specifications, performance, and quality assurance of radiographic and fluoroscopic systems in the digital era, AAPM monograph 30. College Park, MD: AAPM; 2004. p. 177–229.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huda W, Abrahams RB. X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:W393–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yorkston J. Senior research scientist, clinical applications research, Carestream Health Inc., New York. Personal communications; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nett B. X-ray contrast to noise (CNR) illustrated examples of image noise (SNR, quantum mottle) for radiologic technologists. How Radiology Works LLC; 2023. https://howradiologyworks.com/x-ray-cnr/

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cody DC, McNitt-Gray MF. CT image quality and patient radiation dose: definitions, methods, and trade-offs. RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics: from invisible to visible-the science and practice of X-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization; 2006. p. 141–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seeram E. Rad Tech’s guide to radiation protection. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters-Kluwer; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolbarst AB. Physics of radiology. 2nd ed. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seibert JA. Computed radiography/digital radiography: adult. In: Frush DP, Huda W, editors. From invisible to visible-the science and practice of X-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization: RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics. Oak Brook: RSNA; 2006. p. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krugh K, Ph.D., Dept. of Radiology, The Toledo Hospital. Personal Communications; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spahn M. Flat detectors and their clinical applications. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1934–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willis CE. Computed radiography/digital radiography: pediatric. In: Frush DP, Huda W, editors. From invisible to visible-the science and practice of X-ray imaging and radiation dose optimization: RSNA categorical course in diagnostic radiology physics. Oak Brook: RSNA; 2006. p. 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walz-Flannigan AI, Brossoit KJ, Magnuson DJ, Schueler BA. Pictorial review of digital radiography artifacts. Radiographics. 2018 May–Jun;38(3):833–46. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170038. Epub 2018 Apr 20. PMID: 29676963.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seeram, E. (2023). Digital Image Quality Descriptors and Performance Characteristics. In: X-Ray Imaging Systems for Biomedical Engineering Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46266-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics