Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Latin American Political Economy ((LAPE))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between economic elites and political power is a central issue of social research. Beyond the debates, different analytical frameworks coincide in recognizing classes’ potential or effective capacity to influence political decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an overview of the different positions involved, see Colomer 2004; Rueschemeyer et al. 1992; J. S. Valenzuela 1985, 2001.

  2. 2.

    See https://ladiaria.com.uy/articulo/2016/8/todos-menos-tu/ (Last accessed, June 30, 2023).

References

  • Buquet, Daniel, and Rafael Piñeiro. 2014. La Consolidación de Un Nuevo Sistema de Partidos En Uruguay. Debates 8 (1): 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, Josep. 2004. Taming the Tiger: Voting Rights and Political Instability in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 46 (2): 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, Juan Pablo. 2021. La Chusma Incosciente: La Crisis de Un País Atendido Por Sus Propios Dueños. Santiago de Chile: Catalonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, Juan Pablo, Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez, Fernando Rosenblatt, and Gabriel Vommaro. 2020. Political Parties, Diminished Subtypes, and Democracy. Party Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne Huber, and John D. Stephens. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1985. Democratización Vía Reforma: La Expansión Del Sufragio En Chile. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ildes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 2001. Class Relations and Democratization: A Reassesment of Barrington Moore’s Model. In The Other Mirror: Grand Theory through the Lens of Latin America, ed. Miguel Angel Centeno and Fernando López-Alves, 240–286. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vommaro, Gabriel. 2023. Conservatives against the Tide: The Rise of the Argentine PRO in Comparative Perspective. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781009418256/type/element. June 9, 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Monestier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Monestier, F. (2023). Conclusions. In: Economic Elites, Political Parties and the Electoral Arena. Latin American Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46165-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics