Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unknowability, Heuristics, and Ethical Imperatives of Public Value Creation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges to Public Value Creation

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

Various frameworks or models have been proposed to help guide public managers in public value creation. This chapter argues that they are heuristics designed to address the unknowability problem of public value creation, playing a similar role as many other heuristics in the public administration literature. However, the public value heuristics are not a panacea, and they suffer from insufficient attention to the ethical uncertainties inherent in the value creation process. Four alternative ways of incorporating ethics into public value heuristics are discussed: integrating public value heuristics (e.g., the strategic triangle) with ethics heuristics (e.g., the ethics triangle), identifying major ethical issues in public value creation, examining the cognitive ethical bias that public managers may encounter in value-creation decisions, and attending to institutional ethics that support public value creation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arazmjoo, H., & Rahmanseresht, H. (2019). A multi-dimensional meta-heuristic model for managing organizational change. Management Decision, 58(3), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, P. A. A., Harris, S. G., & Field, H. S. (2000). Paradigms in organizational change: Change agent and change target. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 631–658). Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri, A., & Hjorth, P. (2007). Planning for sustainable development: A paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustainable Development, 15(2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Sezer, O. (2016). Bounded awareness: Implications for ethical decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (1980). Organization change and development: A systems view. Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, J. S., & West, J. P. (2009). To “re-hatch” public employees or not? An ethical analysis of the relaxation of restrictions on political activities in civil service. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2002). Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2022). Rules compliance behavior: A heuristic model. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: Theory and practice. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, R. C. (1994). Deontological dimensions of administrative ethics. In T. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 179–193). Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, S. J. (2015). Many meanings of “heuristic”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(4), 977–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking public value: A new model for achieving high performance in public service organizations. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A., & Soss, J. (2014). Neoliberalism for the common good? Public value governance and the downsizing of democracy. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., & Moore, C. (2020). Toward a better understanding of behavioral ethics in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & van Dijke, M. (2010). Regulating ethical failures: Insights from psychology. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). When misconduct goes unnoticed: The acceptability of gradual erosion in others’ unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 708–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. E. (1967). Patterns of organizational change. Harvard Business Review, 45(3), 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D. K. (1974). Social equity, justice, and the equitable administrator. Public Administration Review, 34, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (2002). The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In D. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 520–533). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L. R. (2014). The contested politics of public value. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joia, L. A. (2004). Developing government-to-government enterprises in Brazil: A heuristic model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 24(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, H. (2019). How to evaluate innovation strategies with a transformative ambition? A proposal for a structured, process-based approach. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1978). The science of “muddling through”. In A. Faludi (Ed.), A reader in planning theory. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynhardt, T. (2014). Public value—Turning a conceptual framework into a scorecard. In J. Bryson, B. Crosby, & L. Bloomberg (Eds.), Valuing public value. University of Minnesota, pre-publication draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Khagram, S. (2004). On creating public value: What business might learn from government about strategic management. Working paper of the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (1994). Public value as the focus of strategy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2013). Recognizing public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2014). Public value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2015). Creating a public value account and scorecard. In J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby, & L. Bloomberg (Eds.), Public value and public administration (pp. 110–130). Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, A., & Thomann, E. (2021). A behavioural model of heuristics and biases in frontline policy implementation. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paharia, N., Kassam, K. S., Greene, J. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebble, M. (2021). Public value is unknowable; public authority makes every government decision a wicked problem. Administration and Society, 53(10), 1582–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1999). Minimalist conception of democracy: A defense. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s value (pp. 23–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A., & Wanna, J. (2009). Bringing the politics back in: Public value in Westminster parliamentary government. Public Administration, 87(2), 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A. W. (2020). Structure, evidence, and heuristic: Evolutionary biology, economics, and the philosophy of their relationship. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. (1997). The ethical triangle: Synthesizing the bases of administrative ethics. Public Integrity Annual, 2(2), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. (2015). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekmann, K. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakkuri, J. (2010). Struggling with ambiguity: Public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88(4), 999–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakkuri, J. (2013). Interpretive schemes in performance management–measurement problems generating managerial action in Finnish local government. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(2), 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & De Graaf, G. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1998). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. A. Klein (Ed.), The strategic management of intellectual capital (pp. 165–176). Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. (2016). Creating public value and institutional innovations across boundaries: An integrative process of participation, legitimation, and implementation. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 873–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Renmin University, Beijing, China

    Kaifeng Yang

  2. Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, South Korea

    Naon Min

Authors
  1. Kaifeng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naon Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaifeng Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Public Administration and Policy, Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA, USA

    Brian J. Cook

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, K., Min, N. (2024). Unknowability, Heuristics, and Ethical Imperatives of Public Value Creation. In: Cook, B.J. (eds) Challenges to Public Value Creation. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46030-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation