Skip to main content

Chivalric Honours

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Class and Social Honour
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

The model of social status is illustrated by an exploration into the foundations of social ranking in English feudalism. It is argued that the terms ‘baron’ and ‘knight’ crystallised as the basis of a social hierarchy of royal honours that lay at the heart of the medieval nobility centred around the idea of chivalry. It is shown that this coexisted with emerging economic class divisions rooted in commercial activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For convenience, I shall use present-day country names as geographical terms, rather than trying to use such contemporary designations as the rulers and inhabitants may have used.

  2. 2.

    In the Scottish kingdoms, companions were generally the heads of clans and were referred to as thanes. The Scottish equivalent of an ealdorman was a mormaer.

  3. 3.

    A third form of tenancy was service by sergeanty or political service.

  4. 4.

    This tripartite distinction has a long history in Indo-European languages and is found in a variety of societies. It is known to have been used in India from around 1500 BC, where three ‘twice-born’ varna were distinguished as brahman (priests), kshatriya (warriors), and vaishya (farmers), all separate from the servile Shudra.

  5. 5.

    The origins of this term are disputed, but it seems most likely to have been used in the same sense as the bachelor who has an academic status below that of a ‘master’. In Roman times, a bachelor milites was junior to an equestrian (equites) and usage may have echoed this.

  6. 6.

    Only in 1429 was a franchise based on land valued at £2 per year introduced—this remained in force until the nineteenth century.

  7. 7.

    The term ‘peasant’ is not appropriate for this period, as argued by Macfarlane (1978), and though the term ‘serf’ is widely used in Marxism to refer to the village labourers, it, too, is not strictly accurate.

  8. 8.

    The equivalents of the esquire’s post-nominal in other countries were the predicates don in Spain, de in France, von in the German states, and van in the Low Countries (Bush 1983: 141–142).

  9. 9.

    Bloch (1938: 330–331) emphasised the legal basis of a nobility, so saw the English nobility as more weakly defined by custom, but he perhaps overemphasised this point (see Clark 1995: 157–158).

References

  • Anderson, Perry 1975. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Richard 2013. Edward III and the Triumph of England. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnie, Arthur 1935. An Economic History of the British Isles. London: Methuen, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Marc 1938. Feudal Society. Two volumes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boalt, Gunnar, Erikson, Robert, Glück, Harry and Lautz, Herman 1991. The European Orders of Chivalry. Carbondale, IL.: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, Michael L. 1983. Noble privilege. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Samuel 1995. State and Status. The Rise of the State and Aristocratic Power in Western Europe. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Samuel 2017. Distributing Status. The Evolution of State honours in Western Europe. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duby, Georges 1978. The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert 1933. The Court Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourquin, G. 1976. Lordship and Feudalism in the Middle Ages. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, Barry and Hirst, Paul Q. 1975. Pre-capitalist Modes of Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George 1941. English Villagers of the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. E. 1974. Family, Lineage, and Civil Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Dan 2012. The plantagenets. The kings who made England. London: William Collins, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, Maurice 1984. Chivalry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, Alan 1978. The Origins of English Individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, Frederick W. 1897. Domesday Book and Beyond. Glasgow: Fontana, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl 1852. ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’ in Marx, K. (ed.) Surveys From Exile. London: Verso, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, Kenneth Bruce 1973. The Nobility of Later Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, S. 1943. Studies in the History of the English Feudal Barony. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi, Gianfranco 1978. The Development of the Modern State. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postan, Michael 1972. Medieval Economy and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. 1989a. Confessions of a Reluctant Theorist. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, Nigel 2011. For Honour and Fame. Chivalry in England, 1066-1500. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squibb, D. G. 1981. Order of Precedence in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenton, Frank M. 1943. Anglo-Saxon England. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. R. 1965. Feudalism. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. R. 1971. Medieval Statecraft and the Perspectives of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, Richard H. 1926. Religion and The Rise of Capitalism. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel 1980. The modern world system II: Mercantilism and the consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, Dorothy 1952. The Beginnings of English Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Ellen Meiskins 2008. Citizens to Lords. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scott, J. (2024). Chivalric Honours. In: Class and Social Honour. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45948-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45948-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45947-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45948-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics