Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Design Research Foundations ((DERF))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores aspects of functions in order to clarify the meaning of this concept in the overall context of technical artefacts. At the same time it will provide the background for the discussion of concepts of action and means-end relations presented in Parts IV and V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Michael May is acknowledged for pointing out that the ascription of functions is only valid for technical artefacts or natural objects (including living systems) when used for a human purpose. The functions of genetically engineered biological systems have functions which are either immanent (by nature) or ascribed to them (by design). When immanent, the concept of function is based on evolutionary criteria. In design of e.g. a biochemical reactor, the functions ascribed to the biochemical processes is related to human intentions.

  2. 2.

    Sommerhoff introduced the distinction between goal oriented and goal directed behavior in [1].

  3. 3.

    Langkjær [3] has proposed the distinction used here between direct and derived needs.

  4. 4.

    Quantitative expressions are not really necessary for understanding the distinction between device- and environment-centric functions. They are only included to satisfy readers familiar with equations. What matters here are the qualitative causal relations between the current and the voltage and the heat power which are implied by the equations.

References

  1. G. Sommerhoff. Analytical Biology. London: Oxford University Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Wright. “Functions”. In: The Philosophical Review LXXXII (1973), pp. 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Langkjaer. Contributions to a General Normology or Theory of Purpose Setting. Copenhagen: Dansk Videnskabs Forlag, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Achinstein. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Mumford. Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. R. Luria. The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Chandrasekharan and J. R. Josephson. “Function in Device Representation”. In: Engineering with Computers 16(3/4) (2000), pp. 162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Rescher. Process Metaphysics - An Introduction to Process Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Browning and W. T. Myers. Philosophers of Process. New York: Fordham University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Dowe. Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Harré and E. H. Madden. Causal Powers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. O. Everett. “A Theory of Mapping from Structure To Function”. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA, 1996, pp. 1837–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. O. Everett. “Topological Inference of Teleology: Deriving Function from Structure via Evidential Reasoning”. In: Artificial Intelligence 113 (1999), pp. 149–202.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. L. Mackie. “Causes and Conditions”. In: Causation. Ed. by E. Sosa and M. Tooley. Oxford University Press, 1993. Chap. 1, pp. 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. G. Collingwood. An Essay on Metaphysics. Martino Publishing, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Merton. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. W. Gouldner. “Reciprocity and Autonomy in Functional Theory”. In: Symposium on Sociological Theory. Ed. by L. Gross. Row, Peterson and Company, 1959, pp. 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. M. Deng. “Function and Behavior Representation in Conceptual Mechanical Design”. In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16 (2002), pp. 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Emmet. Function, Purpose and Powers. New York: MacMillan and Co, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. del Frate. “Failure: Analysis of an Engineering Concept”. PhD thesis. Technical University of Delft, Holland, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. G. Hempel. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. London: The Free Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. R. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lind, M. (2024). Aspects of Functions. In: Foundations for Functional Modeling of Technical Artefacts. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45917-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45918-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics