Abstract
This chapter explores aspects of functions in order to clarify the meaning of this concept in the overall context of technical artefacts. At the same time it will provide the background for the discussion of concepts of action and means-end relations presented in Parts IV and V.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Michael May is acknowledged for pointing out that the ascription of functions is only valid for technical artefacts or natural objects (including living systems) when used for a human purpose. The functions of genetically engineered biological systems have functions which are either immanent (by nature) or ascribed to them (by design). When immanent, the concept of function is based on evolutionary criteria. In design of e.g. a biochemical reactor, the functions ascribed to the biochemical processes is related to human intentions.
- 2.
Sommerhoff introduced the distinction between goal oriented and goal directed behavior in [1].
- 3.
Langkjær [3] has proposed the distinction used here between direct and derived needs.
- 4.
Quantitative expressions are not really necessary for understanding the distinction between device- and environment-centric functions. They are only included to satisfy readers familiar with equations. What matters here are the qualitative causal relations between the current and the voltage and the heat power which are implied by the equations.
References
G. Sommerhoff. Analytical Biology. London: Oxford University Press, 1950.
L. Wright. “Functions”. In: The Philosophical Review LXXXII (1973), pp. 139–168.
A. Langkjaer. Contributions to a General Normology or Theory of Purpose Setting. Copenhagen: Dansk Videnskabs Forlag, 1961.
P. Achinstein. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
S. Mumford. Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
A. R. Luria. The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology. Basic Books, 1974.
B. Chandrasekharan and J. R. Josephson. “Function in Device Representation”. In: Engineering with Computers 16(3/4) (2000), pp. 162–177.
N. Rescher. Process Metaphysics - An Introduction to Process Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.
D. Browning and W. T. Myers. Philosophers of Process. New York: Fordham University Press, 1998.
P. Dowe. Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
R. Harré and E. H. Madden. Causal Powers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975, p. 191.
J. O. Everett. “A Theory of Mapping from Structure To Function”. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA, 1996, pp. 1837–1843.
J. O. Everett. “Topological Inference of Teleology: Deriving Function from Structure via Evidential Reasoning”. In: Artificial Intelligence 113 (1999), pp. 149–202.
J. L. Mackie. “Causes and Conditions”. In: Causation. Ed. by E. Sosa and M. Tooley. Oxford University Press, 1993. Chap. 1, pp. 33–55.
R. G. Collingwood. An Essay on Metaphysics. Martino Publishing, 2014.
R. K. Merton. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1957.
A. W. Gouldner. “Reciprocity and Autonomy in Functional Theory”. In: Symposium on Sociological Theory. Ed. by L. Gross. Row, Peterson and Company, 1959, pp. 241–270.
Y. M. Deng. “Function and Behavior Representation in Conceptual Mechanical Design”. In: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16 (2002), pp. 343–362.
D. Emmet. Function, Purpose and Powers. New York: MacMillan and Co, 1958.
L. del Frate. “Failure: Analysis of an Engineering Concept”. PhD thesis. Technical University of Delft, Holland, 2014.
C. G. Hempel. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. London: The Free Press, 1965.
J. R. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lind, M. (2024). Aspects of Functions. In: Foundations for Functional Modeling of Technical Artefacts. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45917-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45918-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)