Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Design Research Foundations ((DERF))

  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

Causality and the concept of function are closely related and theories of causality are therefore important for the foundations of functional modelling. However, a generally accepted theory of causality is not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The efficient cause and final cause refers to Aristotle’s distinction between four causes; the material, efficient, formal and final causes. These distinctions are used by Collingwood but are today considered of historical interest only.

  2. 2.

    Gasking [30] claims that recipes can cause something. But recipes or procedures are more like the manner in which some means are used in action. The distinction between the means and manner of acting are discussed in Chap. 10.

  3. 3.

    The causal aspect of the means-end relations is accordingly of the general and not of the singular type.

References

  1. P. Menzies and C. List. “The Causal Autonomy of the Special Sciences”. In: Emergence in Mind. Ed. by C. McDonald and G. McDonald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 108–129.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Illari and F. Russo. Causality: Philosophical Theory Meets Scientific Practice. Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Pearl. Causality. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R. G. Collingwood. An Essay on Metaphysics. Martino Publishing, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Hume. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by L. A. Selby- Bigge and P. H. Niddich. 3rd ed. Clarendon, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Mumford and R. L. Anjum. Causation: A very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2013. 128 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Rescher. Process Metaphysics - An Introduction to Process Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Molnar. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Harré and E. H. Madden. Causal Powers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Mumford. “Dispositions”. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Bunge. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology I- The furniture of the world. Vol. 3. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing company, 1977.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mumford. Laws in Nature. Abingdon, OX14 4RN: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Pedersen. “Causal and Diagnostic Reasoning”. In: Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 10.2-3 (1990), pp. 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. L. Mackie. “Causes and Conditions”. In: Causation. Ed. by E. Sosa and M. Tooley. Oxford University Press, 1993. Chap. 1, pp. 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. A. Pedersen and J. Rasmussen. “Causal and Diagnostic Reasoning in Medicine and Engineering”. In: Cognitive Processes and Resources. Proceedings of 2nd MOHAWK Workshop. Vol.3. Ed. by H. B. Andersen, S. A. Pedersen, C. Cacciabue and J. Reason. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Petersen. “Focus and Causal Reasoning in Disturbance Management of Complex Dynamic Systems”. In: Proceedings 19th European Annual Conference in Human Decision Making and Manual Control (EAM2000). Ed. by P. C. Cacciabue. Ispra, Italy, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Dowe. Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Deely. Basics of Semiotics. American University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Freeman. The Categories of Charles Peirce. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co., 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Morris. Signification and Significance. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Chandler. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Nöth. Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Toyoshima. “Modelling Affordances with Dispositions”. In: Proceedings of The Joint Ontology Workshop JOWO 2018. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016: Psychology Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. von Uexküll. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans. University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Albrechtsen, H. H. K. Andersen, S. Bødker and A. M. Pejtersen. Affordances in Activity Theory and Cognitive Systems Engineering. Tech. rep. Risø- R-1287. Roskilde, Denmark: RisøNational Laboratory, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Wide. “Causation and Reason: R. G. Collingwood and Causal Analysis as the Essence of Social Thinking”. In: Distinktion Journal of Social Theory 18.2 (2017), pp. 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. R. Searle. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Schutz. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Gasking. “Causation and Recipes”. In: Mind 64.256 (1955), pp. 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Russel. Mysticism and Logic. Unwin Books, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Kim. Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Højrup. State, Culture and Life-Modes: The Foundations of Life-Mode Analysis. Routledge, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lind, M. (2024). Causality. In: Foundations for Functional Modeling of Technical Artefacts. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45917-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45918-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics