Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Design Research Foundations ((DERF))

  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to use the action types described in Chap. 10 to define basic generic dyadic transformations which are formalizations of the causal aspects of physical actions, and of interpretations which can be used to express possible intentions of the agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The naming of the elementary intervention types are slightly different from those used by von Wright. An example: the type \(\neg pTpI\neg p\) i.e. “make p happen” is named “produce p” by von Wright. Producing has connotation to intentions and causality whereas making only has connotations to causality. The names shown in Table 11.2 have therefore been chosen to express the causal interpretation of actions, and von Wrights terms produce, destroy, maintain and suppress are used to express intentional aspects of doings.

  2. 2.

    The meaning of \(\neg p\) is here according to the rules of propositional logic. The semantic problems is a consequences of ignoring Bergson’s argument against negation mentioned in Sect. 11.3.

References

  1. G. H. von Wright. Norm and Action - A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. H. von Wright. An Essay in Deontic Logic and The General Theory of Action. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bergson. Creative Evolution. New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc., 1998, p. 407.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Schutz. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. C. Danto. Analytical Philosophy of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Lind. Description of Composite Actions - Towards a Formalization of Safety Functions. Tech. rep. NKS-R(04)07/11 Barriers, Control and Management. Nordic Nuclear Safety Research, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Achinstein. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lind, M. (2024). Dyadic Transformations. In: Foundations for Functional Modeling of Technical Artefacts. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45918-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45917-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45918-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics