Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter explores the contemporary issues surrounding offender rehabilitation within the criminal justice system. It examines the challenges and complexities that arise in promoting successful rehabilitation and reducing recidivism rates among individuals involved in criminal activities. The chapter emphasizes the significance of adopting a holistic approach to offender rehabilitation. It explores the integration of various therapeutic modalities, vocational training, educational programs, and social support systems to address the diverse needs of offenders. The chapter also discusses the importance of tailoring interventions to consider the individual’s risk factors, strengths, and cultural background. The chapter delves into the issue of community reintegration, highlighting the challenges faced by individuals upon their release from correctional facilities. It explores the barriers to successful reentry, such as limited housing options, employment opportunities, and social support networks. The chapter also examines the role of correctional psychotherapy in preparing individuals for community reintegration and reducing the likelihood of recidivism. In conclusion, this chapter brings attention to the contemporary issues and challenges faced in the realm of offender rehabilitation. It stresses the importance of evidence-based practices, a holistic approach, and community reintegration in promoting successful rehabilitation outcomes. By addressing these issues, professionals in the field can enhance the effectiveness of offender rehabilitation programs and ultimately contribute to the reduction of recidivism rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, W. D., Mann, K., Blomberg, T. G., & Wiles, P. (2010). A new measure of prison-based rehabilitation and its association with recidivism: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(6), 1113–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnert, E. S., Perry, R., Morris, R. E., & Ryan, G. (2014). Access to healthcare and clinical services for youth in juvenile detention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(6), S1–S3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2014). Introduction to forensic psychology: Research and application. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. E., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., de Kalmthout, A. M., de Velde, T., Merkelbach, H., Schene, A. H., & Vecchi, G. M. (2020). Rehabilitation for all? Moral and ethical deliberations on victim-offender mediation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., Lipman, E. L., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (2017). Offender rehabilitation: Lessons learned from meta-analyses of treatment interventions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(4), 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, G., Amin, Y., Saxton, M., & Charlesworth, J. (2012). Offender learning and skills service research report. Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, T., Ray, B., Hartman, M., & O’Donnell, C. (2020). Effective interventions for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20(2), 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumbarger, B. K., & Campbell, E. M. (2012). A state agency-university partnership for translational research and the dissemination of evidence-based prevention and intervention. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39(4), 268–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, W. M. (2016). Best practices in substance abuse treatment for offenders. In W. M. Burdon & C. R. Bartoi (Eds.), Offenders, deviants or patients? (pp. 187–206). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. A., & Brown, R. B. (2020). Effective interventions for offender reentry programs: Evidence supporting continuous support. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(2), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. In Council of Europe Treaty Series 005. Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, E. (2018). “Reentry courts” and aftercare: A promising intervention to reduce recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(15), 4656–4674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. G., Wong, S. C. P., Love, M. S., & Borum, R. (2019). Is general risk assessment relevant for mental health? Distinguishing risk for general and violent recidivism among mental health patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 1056–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, P. K. (2016). The next generation of community correctional interventions. In C. Sullivan, L. J. Hahn, E. Jedele, & R. Dunlap (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 428–442). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Zane, S. N., & Latessa, E. J. (2019). Can technology improve the delivery of correctional rehabilitation programming? A meta-analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(1), 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, E. L., & Wakefield, S. (2014). The right to rehabilitation and its limits: Recent developments in the European Court of Human Rights. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., & Mann, R. E. (2019). Rehabilitation of offenders. In P. Gendreau, C. A. Goggin, & F. T. Cullen (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offender rehabilitation (pp. 112–124). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2016). What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaschek, D. L., Brennan, M. C., & Byron, R. (2021). Treatment planning in offender rehabilitation: Principles, challenges, and recommendations. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 63(2), 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, P., Mann, R., & Watson, C. (2019). Rehabilitation and treatment of adult male offenders. In P. Gendreau, C. A. Goggin, & F. T. Cullen (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on offender rehabilitation (pp. 75–98). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. (2014). Treating adult substance abuse using technology-based interventions in criminal justice settings. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S. (2018). Tools for building the rehabilitation infrastructure: Evidence-based practices in community supervision. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(4), 1027–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2019). Organizational context, systems change, and adopting evidence-based practices: A qualitative analysis of collaboration between probation agencies and community treatment providers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(5), 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., & Marlowe, D. (2006a). Risk, needs, responsivity: In action or inaction? Crime & Delinquency, 52(3), 369–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taxman, F. S., & Marlowe, D. (2006b). Social policy: Impact of employment on reducing recidivism. Federal Probation, 70(3), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Um, T. (2018). Reentry programs, jobs, and recidivism rates among the formerly incarcerated in the United States. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(5), 617–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

  • Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Blackburn, R. (2018). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 metric. In S. D. Hart & A. R. Beech (Eds.), Evaluating risk in mental health (pp. 173–193). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Hurley, D. J., Gropper, R. J., & Haynes, L. E. (2021). Making the most of the opportunities: Evidence-based program planning for correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 72(1), 6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormith, S. J., Althouse, R., Simpson, J., Reitzel, L. R., & Nicol, A. (2019). The good lives model in corrections: Clinical implications and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(6), 946–963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sapp, K. (2023). Offender Rehabilitation as a Contemporary Issue. In: Understanding Offending Populations and the Power of Correctional Psychotherapy. SpringerBriefs in Offending Populations & Correctional Psychotherapy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45886-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics