Skip to main content

Bentham via Dumont on the Balance of Trade

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
British Modern International Thought in the Making

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Michael Quinn argues that although Bentham’s only works on international trade were discussions on “the balance of trade” and “colonial trade,” these works reveal several new aspects of Bentham’s broader political economy. Like Smith, Bentham considered international trade to be mutually beneficial and strongly criticized mercantilist fallacies concerning balance of trade and the fetishization of precious metals. However, Bentham’s views differ from Smith’s on the issues of paper money and inflation. The chapter explains Bentham’s struggles to combine elements of both commodity and credit theories of money in a coherent package.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The other mercantilist attitudes, in regard to which it is difficult to see where Bentham would have disagreed with Smith, concerned on one hand its elevation of producers’ interests over those of consumers, as influential manufacturers and merchants filled the policy agenda with restrictions on trade and bounties on domestic production and export which raised prices; and, on the other, its almost exclusive focus on profits, to the exclusion of consideration of wages. See Winch (1996, 109–112).

  2. 2.

    The Navigation Acts restricted trade between Britain and her colonies to British shipping and manned by sailors forming a reserve of manpower for the Royal Navy.

  3. 3.

    Both Dome and Deleplace and Sigot argue that Bentham abandoned the Annuity Note scheme altogether, though for different reasons (Dome 2004, 85; Deleplace and Sigot 2012, 758–759). This is not strictly correct. As late as 5 August 1801, that is while deeply engaged in drafting ‘True Alarm’, far from abandoning the scheme, and though recognizing that unless it succeeded in displacing an equal quantity of private paper from the circulation, the considerable benefits of the scheme would be outweighed by its inflationary consequences, he argued that those benefits were sufficient to demand that ‘the quantity of private paper should, from time to time, be subjected to ulterior retrenchments by positive law’ (BL Add. MSS 31235. 70; Bentham 2019b6, 55n). In 1820, when advised that the new liberal government in Spain would be interested in his thoughts on monetary reform, he suggested that the scheme might be adopted there if steps were taken to accommodate its provisions to local circumstances (UC xxii, 261; Bentham 2019c8).

  4. 4.

    In their masterly discussion, Deleplace and Sigot (2012, 737–738) quote an inventory of the materials with which Bentham equipped Dumont in December 1802, where ‘Political Economy. Ballance of Trade’ is discretely listed as the sixth item (Bentham 1988b, 163n), but three other sections definitively drafted for ‘True Alarm’ are also discretely listed, as the second, fourth and fifth items, so any inference that discrete listing implies separate work would be unwarranted.

  5. 5.

    The full set of such statements is as follows: ‘Je ne comprens pas trop’ (MS Dumont 51, 79); ‘Non capio’ (MS Dumont 51, 100, 111, 132, 133); ‘Omissis non intellectis’ (MS Dumont 51, 101); ‘Je n’y entens rien’ (MS Dumont 51, p. 105); ‘Je ne comprens pas’ (MS Dumont 51, 106); ‘Je ne suis pas au fait’ (MS Dumont 51, 106); ‘Je ne vois pas la force’ (MS Dumont 51, 111); ‘[L]e MSS est si difficile que je n’ai pu le dechiffrer complettement’ (MS Dumont 51, 117); ‘Cette matière est si nouvelle pour moi je n’ai aucune Idée ici’ (MS Dumont 51, 123).

  6. 6.

    The omitted Chapters were Chapter V, ‘Examination of the question of fact—another false supposition of the mercantile system’; Chapter VII. ‘Falsity of the fact demonstrated by the quantity of gold and silver imported into Europe’; Chapter XII ‘Other sources or error’; and Chapter XIII. ‘The theory of balance considered in its entirety’. All four will be restored in the published version of the essay, which, like ‘The True Alarm’, will appear in the final volume of Bentham’s Writings on Political Economy.

  7. 7.

    See the ‘Report of the House of Lords Committee appointed to enquire into the Causes which produced the Order in Council of 26th February last’ [i.e. 1797], in Lords Journals (1796–1798) xli. 186–262. Thomas Irving (1738?–1800), civil servant, Inspector-General of the Imports and Exports of Great Britain, and of the British Colonies 1786–1800. On Irving, see McCusker (1997, 131–149).

  8. 8.

    All quotations from Dumont’s texts are my translations.

  9. 9.

    For sterling work in this direction, see Benjamin Bourcier’s contribution to this volume.

Bibliography

Manuscript Sources

  • BL Add. MSS—British Library, Additional Manuscripts.

    Google Scholar 

  • MS Dumont—Bibliothèque de Genève, Manuscrits Etienne Dumont.

    Google Scholar 

  • UC—Bentham Papers in the Library of University College London.

    Google Scholar 

Print Sources

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1811. Théorie des peines et recompenses, 3 vols., ed. Étienne Dumont. Paris: Bosange.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1952–1954. Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings, 3 vols., ed. W. Stark. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988a. The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. VI, ed. J. R. Dinwiddy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988b. The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, vol. VII, ed. J. R. Dinwiddy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Rights, Representation, and Reform: Nonsense upon Stilts and Other Writings on the French Revolution, ed. P. Schofield, C. Pease-Watkin, and C. Blamires. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. Writings on Political Economy: Vol. I, Including Defence of Usury, Manual of Political Economy, and Protest Against Law Taxes, ed. M. Quinn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019a. Writings on Political Economy: Vol. II; Financial Resources; Including Supply Without Burthen and Proposals Relative to Divers Modes of Supply, ed. M. Quinn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b. Writings on Political Economy Volume IV: Circulating Annuities and other writings on National Debt. Preprint. https://rdr.ucl.ac.uk/articles/Writings_on_Political_Economy_Volume_V_Preliminaries_and_preliminary_text_files_1-2_5-15_/10110860. The online volume consists of discretely paginated files, so page references in this chapter are specific to the following discrete works therein:

  • ———. 2019b1. Political Prospects; Or, What’s to Be Done? Or, What Is to Become of Us?

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b2. On the Stock Note Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b3. Circulating Annuities: Exhibiting a Plan for the Creation, Circulation and Payment, of a Proposed New Species of Government Paper Currency Under the Name of Annuity Notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b4. Appendix E to “Circulating Annuities: Notes for a Proposed Work ‘National Prospects in the Field of Political Economy, or, Picture of Futurity’”.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b5. Abstract or Compressed View of a Tract intituled Circulating Annuities.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b6. Observations by Sir Fred. Morton Eden … on the Annuity Note Plan …:—With Counter-Observations by the Author of the Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c. Writings on Political Economy V. Wealth, Money, and Prices; Including Thoughts on Paper Money, Defence of a Maximum, and Method and Leading Features of an Institute of Political Economy, ed. M. Quinn. Preprint. https://rdr.ucl.ac.uk/articles/Writings_on_Political_Economy_Volume_V_Preliminaries_and_preliminary_text_files_1-2_5-15_/10110860. The online volume consists of discretely paginated files, so page references in this chapter are specific to the following discrete works therein:

  • ———. 2019c1. Thoughts on Paper Money. Shewing the Mischiefs Flowing from It—Including Its Share in the Present Pressure—Together with an Indication of the Remedy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c2. Marginal Contents for ‘The True Alarm; or, View of Paper Money—Its Good Effects, Bad Effects, and Their Remedies, and Its Connection with Real Wealth’.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c3. “Discussion sur le papier monnaie à propos une ouvrage d’H. Thornton.”

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c4. Defence of a Maximum, in Answer to the Arguments on That Head in a Pamphlet of 1800 Attributed to a Late Secretary to the Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c5. Method and Leading Features of an Institute of Political Economy (including Finance) Considered Not Only as a Science, but as an Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c6. Unsent Letter to a Newspaper: ‘Paper and Gold’.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c7. Paper Money for Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019c8. Appendix to ‘Paper money for Spain’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, William. 1801. A Letter to the Right Honourable William Pitt, on the Influence of the Stoppage of Issues in Specie at the Bank of England, on the Prices of Provisions, and other Commodities, 2nd ed. London: Debrett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleplace, Ghislain, and Sigot, Nathalie. 2009. “From ‘Annuity Notes’ to Bank Notes: A Change in Bentham’s Theory of Money. Unpublished Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Ricardo’s Critique of Bentham’s French Manuscript: Secure Currency Versus Secure Banks. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (5): 733–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, Andy. 2021. The Revolution That Did Not Happen: Terence Hutchison on the Political Economy of Jeremy Bentham. Cambridge Journal of Economics 45: 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dome, Takuo. 2004. Political Economy of Public Finance in Britain, 1767–1873. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1985 [1752]. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Terence Wilmot. 1956. Bentham as an Economist. Economic Journal 66: 288–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, Geoffrey. 2020. Money: Ideology, History, Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, Thomas R. 1811. Publications on the Depreciation of Paper Currency. Edinburgh Review 17: 340–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Felix. 2014. Money: The Unauthorised Biography. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, John. 1997. Colonial Civil Servant and Counter Revolutionary: Thomas Irving (1738?–1800) in Boston, Charleston, and London. In Essays in the Economic History of the Atlantic World, ed. John McCusker. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell Innes, A. 1914. The Credit Theory of Money. Banking Law Journal 31: 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Morris. 1986. The Bullionist Controversy Revisited. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 745–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, David. 1810. The High Price of Bullion: A Proof of the Depreciation of Bank Notes. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1951–1973. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols., ed. P. Sraffa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, George. 1799. A Brief Examination into the Increase of the Revenue, Commerce, and Manufactures, of Great Britain, from 1792 to 1799, 6th ed. London: Wright et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigot, Nathalie. 2001. Bentham et l’économie: Une histoire d’utilité. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols., ed. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, and W.B. Todd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Henry. 1939 [1802]. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain, ed. F.A. Hayek. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Isabella M. 2021. The Nature of Money and the Theory of International Trade: Thornton and Ricardo (Economics Department Working Paper Series). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Ambrose. 1817 [1799]. Two Letters Describing a Method of Increasing the Quantity of Circulating Money upon a New and Solid Principle. London: A. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Donald. 1996. Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain 1750–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Quinn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Quinn, M. (2024). Bentham via Dumont on the Balance of Trade. In: Bourcier, B., Jakonen, M. (eds) British Modern International Thought in the Making. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45713-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics