Abstract
Debridement plays a pivotal role in the management of ulcers by facilitating wound healing and preventing complications. This procedure involves the removal of necrotic tissue, foreign material, and debris from the wound bed to create an optimal environment for healing.
Various methods of debridement are available, each with its unique advantages and considerations. Autolytic debridement harnesses the body’s natural healing processes, utilizing moisture-retentive dressings to promote enzymatic breakdown of necrotic tissue. Enzymatic debridement involves the application of topical agents, such as bromelain or collagenase, to selectively target and dissolve devitalized tissue. Mechanical debridement employs physical force, such as wet-to-dry dressings or high-pressure irrigation, to mechanically remove debris and necrotic material. Sharp debridement is a surgical technique performed by skilled practitioners using sharp instruments to precisely excise necrotic tissue. Surgical debridement, on the other hand, involves more extensive tissue removal and is typically reserved for complex or non-responsive wounds.
The choice of debridement method depends on various factors, including the characteristics of the ulcer, such as size, depth, and presence of infection, as well as the patient’s overall health and individual considerations. Careful assessment and consideration of these factors are essential to determine the most appropriate approach for effective debridement.
A comprehensive understanding of debridement contributes to improved ulcer management outcomes, promoting wound healing and enhancing overall patient well-being.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, et al. Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK’s National Health Service. Int Wound J. 2017;14(2):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12603.
Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11(Suppl 1):S1–28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x.
Kirshen C, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald RG. Debridement: a vital component of wound bed preparation. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006;19(9):506–17.; quiz 517-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200611000-00011.
Kottner J, Cuddigan J, Carville K, et al. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: the protocol for the second update of the international clinical practice guideline 2019. J Tissue Viability. 2019:28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2019.01.001.
Maruccia M, Onesti MG, Sorvillo V, et al. An alternative treatment strategy for complicated chronic wounds: negative pressure therapy over mesh skin graft. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8395219. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8395219.
Atkin L. Understanding methods of wound debridement. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(12):S10-12., S14-15. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.sup12.S10.
Giudice G, Filoni A, Maggio G, et al. Use of the stromal vascular fraction in intermediate-deep acute burns: a case with its own control. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39(5):846–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irx017.
Wolcott RD, Kennedy JP, Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2009;18(2):54–6. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38743.
Atkin L, Rippon M. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(20 Suppl):S40–7. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.S40.
Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021;10(12):685–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1232.
Ramundo J, Gray M. Enzymatic wound debridement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(3):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000319125.21854.78.
McCallon SK, Weir D, Lantis JC. Optimizing wound bed preparation with collagenase enzymatic debridement. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2014;6(1-2):14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccw.2015.08.003.
Cigna E, Maruccia M, Sorvillo V, Parisi P, Palumbo F, Onesti MG. The use of negative pressure therapy and hyaluronic acid for the management of post-traumatic lower limb injury. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):534–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01011.x.
Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S. Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:55–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55.
Qing C. The molecular biology in wound healing & non-healing wound. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20(4):189–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.06.001.
Kammerlander G, Andriessen A, Asmussen P, Brunner U, Eberlein T. Role of the wet-to-dry phase of cleansing in preparing the chronic wound bed for dressing application. J Wound Care. 2005;14(8):349–52. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2005.14.8.26824.
Onesti MG, Fioramonti P, Carella S, Maruccia M. The importance of periwound skin in the treatment of “difficult wound”. G Chir. 2011;32(1-2):83–8.
Choi JS, Lee JH, Kim SM, Kim YJ, Choi JY, Jun YJ. Hydrogel-impregnated dressings for graft fixation: a case series. J Wound Care. 2015;24(7):326–8. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.7.326.
Norman G, Atkinson RA, Smith TA, et al. Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10(10):CD012234. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
Onesti MG, Carella S, Maruccia M, Marchese C, Fino P, Scuderi N. A successful combined treatment with dermal substitutes and products of regenerative medicine in a patient affected by extravasation injury from hypertonic solution. In Vivo. 2012;26(1):139–42.
Morisaki A. A combination of hydrodebridement with pulsed lavage and negative pressure wound therapies may enhance outcomes. J Card Surg. 2022;37(9):2745–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16700.
Dijoux C, Ribal E, Téot L. Use of a moderate-pressure irrigation system to effect debridement in the home setting. J Wound Care. 2008;17(3):134–6., 138. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2008.17.3.28672.
Bath MF, Suresh R, Davies J, Machesney MR. Does pulsed lavage reduce the risk of surgical site infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2021;118:32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.08.021.
Vowden KR, Vowden P. Wound debridement, Part 2: Sharp techniques. J Wound Care. 1999;8(6):291–4. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1999.8.6.25888.
Bluestein D, Javaheri A. Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(10):1186–94.
Téot L. Surgical debridement of wounds. Soins. 2011;752:36–7.
Prodromidis AD, Charalambous CP. The 6-hour rule for surgical debridement of open tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of infection and nonunion rates. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000573.
Saggini R, Saggini A, Spagnoli AM, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an emerging treatment modality for retracting scars of the hands. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(1):185–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.07.028.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pasquale, T., Maruccia, M. (2023). Ulcer Debridement. In: Maruccia, M., Papa, G., Ricci, E., Giudice, G. (eds) Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45452-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45453-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)