Skip to main content

Ulcer Debridement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management

Abstract

Debridement plays a pivotal role in the management of ulcers by facilitating wound healing and preventing complications. This procedure involves the removal of necrotic tissue, foreign material, and debris from the wound bed to create an optimal environment for healing.

Various methods of debridement are available, each with its unique advantages and considerations. Autolytic debridement harnesses the body’s natural healing processes, utilizing moisture-retentive dressings to promote enzymatic breakdown of necrotic tissue. Enzymatic debridement involves the application of topical agents, such as bromelain or collagenase, to selectively target and dissolve devitalized tissue. Mechanical debridement employs physical force, such as wet-to-dry dressings or high-pressure irrigation, to mechanically remove debris and necrotic material. Sharp debridement is a surgical technique performed by skilled practitioners using sharp instruments to precisely excise necrotic tissue. Surgical debridement, on the other hand, involves more extensive tissue removal and is typically reserved for complex or non-responsive wounds.

The choice of debridement method depends on various factors, including the characteristics of the ulcer, such as size, depth, and presence of infection, as well as the patient’s overall health and individual considerations. Careful assessment and consideration of these factors are essential to determine the most appropriate approach for effective debridement.

A comprehensive understanding of debridement contributes to improved ulcer management outcomes, promoting wound healing and enhancing overall patient well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, et al. Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK’s National Health Service. Int Wound J. 2017;14(2):322–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11(Suppl 1):S1–28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirshen C, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald RG. Debridement: a vital component of wound bed preparation. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006;19(9):506–17.; quiz 517-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200611000-00011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kottner J, Cuddigan J, Carville K, et al. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: the protocol for the second update of the international clinical practice guideline 2019. J Tissue Viability. 2019:28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2019.01.001.

  5. Maruccia M, Onesti MG, Sorvillo V, et al. An alternative treatment strategy for complicated chronic wounds: negative pressure therapy over mesh skin graft. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8395219. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8395219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkin L. Understanding methods of wound debridement. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(12):S10-12., S14-15. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.sup12.S10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giudice G, Filoni A, Maggio G, et al. Use of the stromal vascular fraction in intermediate-deep acute burns: a case with its own control. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39(5):846–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irx017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolcott RD, Kennedy JP, Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2009;18(2):54–6. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Atkin L, Rippon M. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(20 Suppl):S40–7. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.S40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuutila K, Eriksson E. Moist wound healing with commonly available dressings. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021;10(12):685–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2020.1232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramundo J, Gray M. Enzymatic wound debridement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(3):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WON.0000319125.21854.78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCallon SK, Weir D, Lantis JC. Optimizing wound bed preparation with collagenase enzymatic debridement. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2014;6(1-2):14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jccw.2015.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cigna E, Maruccia M, Sorvillo V, Parisi P, Palumbo F, Onesti MG. The use of negative pressure therapy and hyaluronic acid for the management of post-traumatic lower limb injury. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):534–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01011.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S. Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:55–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qing C. The molecular biology in wound healing & non-healing wound. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20(4):189–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kammerlander G, Andriessen A, Asmussen P, Brunner U, Eberlein T. Role of the wet-to-dry phase of cleansing in preparing the chronic wound bed for dressing application. J Wound Care. 2005;14(8):349–52. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2005.14.8.26824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Onesti MG, Fioramonti P, Carella S, Maruccia M. The importance of periwound skin in the treatment of “difficult wound”. G Chir. 2011;32(1-2):83–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi JS, Lee JH, Kim SM, Kim YJ, Choi JY, Jun YJ. Hydrogel-impregnated dressings for graft fixation: a case series. J Wound Care. 2015;24(7):326–8. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2015.24.7.326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Norman G, Atkinson RA, Smith TA, et al. Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10(10):CD012234. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Onesti MG, Carella S, Maruccia M, Marchese C, Fino P, Scuderi N. A successful combined treatment with dermal substitutes and products of regenerative medicine in a patient affected by extravasation injury from hypertonic solution. In Vivo. 2012;26(1):139–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morisaki A. A combination of hydrodebridement with pulsed lavage and negative pressure wound therapies may enhance outcomes. J Card Surg. 2022;37(9):2745–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dijoux C, Ribal E, Téot L. Use of a moderate-pressure irrigation system to effect debridement in the home setting. J Wound Care. 2008;17(3):134–6., 138. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2008.17.3.28672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bath MF, Suresh R, Davies J, Machesney MR. Does pulsed lavage reduce the risk of surgical site infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2021;118:32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.08.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vowden KR, Vowden P. Wound debridement, Part 2: Sharp techniques. J Wound Care. 1999;8(6):291–4. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.1999.8.6.25888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bluestein D, Javaheri A. Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(10):1186–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Téot L. Surgical debridement of wounds. Soins. 2011;752:36–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prodromidis AD, Charalambous CP. The 6-hour rule for surgical debridement of open tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of infection and nonunion rates. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saggini R, Saggini A, Spagnoli AM, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an emerging treatment modality for retracting scars of the hands. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(1):185–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.07.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pasquale, T., Maruccia, M. (2023). Ulcer Debridement. In: Maruccia, M., Papa, G., Ricci, E., Giudice, G. (eds) Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45452-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45453-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics