Skip to main content

Wound Hygiene: From Traditional to Microenvironment in Cleansing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management

Abstract

Wound hygiene plays a key role in wound care and consists of different steps according to the wound’s healing phase and local conditions such as infection, contamination, and presence of debris. Cleansing and irrigation solutions have evolved throughout the years and can be combined with mechanical cleansing techniques, all discussed in the following chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schultz GS, Gary Sibbald R, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International consensus document. Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds. Part 3 February 2020. Br J Health Care Manag 14(2):80-83. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2020.14.2.80.

  4. LeBlanc K, Beeckman D, Campbell K, et al. Best practice recommendations for prevention and management of periwound skin complications. Wounds International; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Høiby et al, 2015; Wolcott et al, 2016; Wolcott, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bjarnsholt T, Eberlein T, Malone M, et al. Management of biofilm. Wounds International. 2017;8:2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schultz G, Bjarnsholt T, James GA, et al. Consensus guidelines for the identification and treatment of biofilms in chronic nonhealing wounds. Wound Repair Regen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haesler E, Swanson T, Ousey K, et al. Clinical indicators of wound infection and biofilm: reaching international consensus. J Wound Care. 2019;28:s4–12. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3b.S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. International Wound Infection Institute (IWII). Wound infection in clinical practice: international consensus update 2016. Wounds International; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy C, Atkin L, Swanson T, Tachi M, Tan YK, Vega de Ceniga M, Weir D, Wolcott R. International consensus document. Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibiofilm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. J Wound Care. 2020;29(Suppl 3b):S1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart PS. Biophysics of biofilm infection. Pathog Dis. 2014;70:212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12118.

  12. Malone M, Swanson T. Biofilm-based wound care: the importance of debridement in biofilm treatment strategies. Br J Community Nurs. 2017;22:S20–5. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.Sup6.S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolcott R, Fletcher J. The role of wound cleansing in the management of wounds. Wounds Int. 2014;1(1):25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kamolz L-P, Wild T. Wound bed preparation: the impact of debridement and wound cleansing. Wound Med. 2013;1:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy C, Atkin L, Vega de Ceniga M, Weir D, Swanson T. International consensus document. Embedding Wound Hygiene into a proactive wound healing strategy. J Wound Care. 2022;31:S1–S24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Percival SL, Chen R, Mayer D, et al. Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms. Int Wound J. 2018;15:749–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.1292216.

  17. Tyldesley HC, Salisbury A, Chen R, et al. Surfactants and their role in biofilm management in chronic wounds. Wounds Int. 2019;10(1):20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sibbald RG, Leaper DJ, Queen D. Iodine made easy. Wounds Int. 2011;2:2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Antisepsi e disinfezione in ambito sanitario e socio-sanitario Regione Emilia Romagna aprile 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts CD, Leaper D, Assadian O. The role of topical antiseptic agents within antimicrobial stewardship strategies for prevention and treatment of surgical site and chronic open wound infection. Adv Wound Care. 2017;6(2):63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alves PJ, et al. Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonization and\or biofilm. Int Wound J. 2020:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caniglia, A. (2023). Wound Hygiene: From Traditional to Microenvironment in Cleansing. In: Maruccia, M., Papa, G., Ricci, E., Giudice, G. (eds) Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45452-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45453-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics