Skip to main content

Generic Contextuality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physics and the Nature of Reality

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 215))

  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reviews and develops the concept of “contextuality” whose profound significance—or lack thereof—was clarified especially by Detlef Dürr and his collaborators. In particular, we explore, in the context of a simple toy model of a measurement procedure described using Bohmian mechanics, the dependence of measurement outcomes on the (continuously variable) strength of the coupling between the system and measuring apparatus. This provides a revealing illustration of the fact that the outcomes of experiments may, and in general do, depend on details of the experiment other than simply the Hermitian operator which (as it is often misleadingly said) is “measured” in the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    As usual, the probability current is not unique. Any divergenceless term could be added and the result would still satisfy the continuity equation. Here and in subsequent discussions we simply take the simplest possibility. There are contexts in which it is quite reasonable to consider other possibilities—see, e.g., Ref. [12]—but here we do not expect our central qualitative conclusions to be affected by this issue.

  2. 2.

    Note that this contradicts the implication of Project 7.9 of Ref. [10], which turns out to have been based on a coding error. The author regrets the earlier mistake and thanks Tim Maudlin, private communication, for expressing skepticism about the earlier claim. It is hoped that the present paper clarifies precisely the situations under which this \(\lambda \)-dependence type of contextuality does and does not arise.

References

  1. D. Dürr, S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory (Springer, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum mechanical description of reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Schrödinger, The present situation in quantum mechanics, in Naturwissenschaften, vol. 23 (1935), translated by J. Trimmer, in Proceedings of the American Philosohpical Society, vol. 124, 10 (Oct. 1980), pp. 323–338

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Julius Springer - Verlag, Berlin, 1932), (English translation Princeton University Press, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kochen, E. Specker, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Held, “The Kochen-Specker Theorem”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/kochen-specker/

  8. T. Norsen, The pilot-wave perspective on spin. Am. J. Phys. 82, 337 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D.Z. Albert, Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992), p. 153

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Norsen, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: An Exploration of the Physical Meaning of Quantum Theory (Springer, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Daumer, D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, N. Zanghi, Naive Realism about operators. Erkenntnis 45, 379–397 (1996). (quant-ph/9601013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Das, D. Dürr, “Arrival Time Distributions of Spin-1/2 Particles”, Nature Scientific Reports, vol. 9, p. 2242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38261-4

  13. Y. Aharonov, S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, On conservation laws in quantum mechanics. PNAS (2020). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921529118

  14. J.S. Bell, “Against ‘Measurement’,” in 62 Years of Uncertainty: Erice, 5-14 Aug. 1989 (Plenum Publishers, New York); reprinted in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Travis Norsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Norsen, T. (2024). Generic Contextuality. In: Bassi, A., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., Zanghì, N. (eds) Physics and the Nature of Reality. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45434-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics