Skip to main content

Statistical Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facets of Noise

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 214))

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter discusses the statistical physics approach to study of interacting particle systems. We start with a brief review of thermodynamics and then introduce the concept of statistical ensembles, discussing in turn the three major statistical ensembles, the microcanonical, the canonical, and the grand canonical ensemble. We recapitulate the notion of major thermodynamic potentials and how they may be used to define phase transitions. We next discuss equivalence of statistical ensembles, using the Legendre–Fenchel transformation. We work out for a model system of interacting classical Heisenberg spins the properties in canonical equilibrium, and discuss how ensemble equivalence allows to infer properties in microcanonical equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Typical \(\Delta t\)’s would be of the order of seconds, while particles in typical thermodynamic systems move on a timescale of order of milliseconds or less. This suggests that the system would indeed pass through really a very large number of microstates during the duration \(\Delta t\).

  2. 2.

    This is only an a priori guess, and its correctness in a given situation may only be checked a posteriori by validating theoretical results based on this guess against experimental findings.

  3. 3.

    We have already remarked that we have \(E_1 \propto N_1\) and \(E_2 \propto N_2\), which implies that we have \(E \propto N\). Computation of entropy for an arbitrary system is not an easy task because of the difficulties in computing the constrained integral (4.43) defining the quantity \(\Gamma (N,V,E)\). Nevertheless, at least for an ideal gas, one can compute \(\Gamma \) exactly and thence, show that one has \(S \propto N\) [3].

  4. 4.

    Note that system 1 and system 2 are parts of the same system, and so the quantities \(H_1\) and \(H_2\) have the same mathematical form; the subscripts 1 and 2 are being added here for ease of comprehension by the uninitiated.

  5. 5.

    Customarily, while defining Z, one divides the right hand side of Eq. (4.72) by \(N! \,h^{3N} \), which would only add a constant term in F. The factor \(h^{3N}\) makes Z dimensionless and the factor of N!, known as the correct Boltzmann counting, takes into account the indistinguishability of particles in quantum mechanics. However, there is no way to derive this within the ambit of classical mechanics, in which no consistent way exists to regard the particles indistinguishable. We remark that these constant factors would prove irrelevant in what concerns observable properties of the system, which would all be defined in terms of derivatives of the free energy, in much the same way as the constant factor \(S_0\) in the definition of the entropy in Eq. (4.47) had no relevance.

  6. 6.

    At a second-order phase transition point, one observes a scaling \(\left( \sqrt{\langle {H^2}\rangle - \langle {H}\rangle ^2}\right) / \langle {H}\rangle \propto N^{-\alpha }\) with \(1/2<\alpha <1\). Thus, the relative fluctuation in energy is still negligibly small for \(N \gg 1\).

  7. 7.

    Since we are dealing with short-range interacting systems, energy and hence, free energy will grow linearly in N. For long-range interacting systems, such a linear dependence will be guaranteed once the Kac’s trick is invoked, see Sect. 3.3.

  8. 8.

    The infimum of a set A is its greatest lower bound, defined as a quantity m such that there exists no member of the set with a value less than m. When the infimum belongs to A, it is considered a minimum of A.

References

  1. M.W. Zemansky, R.H. Dittman, Heat and Thermodynamics: An intermediate textbook, 7th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.W. Sears, G.L. Salinger, Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory, and Statistical Thermodynamics, 3rd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.K.P. Zia, E.F. Redish, S.R. McKay, Am. J. Phys. 77(7), 614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3119512

  5. A. Campa, T. Dauxois, D. Fanelli, S. Ruffo, Physics of Long-Range Interacting Systems, 1st edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581931.001.0001

  6. S. Gupta, D. Mukamel, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2011(03), P03015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2011/03/P03015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, D., Gupta, S. (2023). Statistical Mechanics. In: Facets of Noise. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45312-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics