Abstract
In the free-recall task, a participant studies a list of words, and then reports those words in whatever order they come to mind. As such, the behavioral dynamics of free recall are revealed by the recall sequences produced by participants. A variety of cognitive models have been designed to account for these behavioral dynamics. These models describe the cognitive operations that give rise to the observed recall sequences. This chapter provides a tutorial overview of a likelihood-based free-recall model designed to connect these cognitive operations with neural signals recorded as participants search their memories during a free-recall task.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation to SMP (#1756417).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This model comparison may not have been strictly necessary: The neurally naive model is nested within the neurally informed model (in that the neurally informed model becomes identical to the naive model when \(\nu =0\)). As such, a statistical technique demonstrating that the best-fit value of \(\nu \) is reliably above zero would allow us to draw similar conclusions.
References
Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review, 84, 413–451.
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114(3), 539–576.
Bullmore, E., Long, C., Suckling, J., Fadili, J., Calvert, G., Zelaya, F., Carpenter, T.A., Brammer, M. (2001). Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains. Human Brain Mapping, 12(2), 61–78.
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. Retrieved 2013-07-25, from http://smr.sagepub.com/content/33/2/261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.
Dougherty, M. & Harbison, J. (2007). Motivated to retrieve: How often are you willing to go back to the well when the well is dry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(6), 1108.
Farrell, S. (2012). Temporal clustering and sequencing in working memory and episodic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 223–271.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001). The elements of statistical learning. Springer.
Healey, M. K. & Kahana, M. J. (2014). Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology—General, 143(2), 575–596.
Howard, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112(1), 75–116.
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299.
Kahana, M. J. (2012). Foundations of human memory (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kragel, J. E., Morton, N. W., & Polyn, S. M. (2015). Neural activity in the medial temporal lobe reveals the fidelity of mental time travel. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 2914–2926.
Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2013). A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120(1), 155–189.
Lohnas, L. J., Polyn, S. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2015). Expanding the scope of memory search: Modeling intralist and interlist effects in free recall. Psychological Review, 122(2), 337–363.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. Oxford University Press.
Mallows, C. L. (1973). Sequential sampling of finite populations with and without replacement. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 24(2), 164–168.
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–57.
Miller, J. F., Weidemann, C. T., & Kahana, M. J. (2012). Recall termination in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 540–550.
Milner, B., Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron, 20(3), 445–468.
Morton, N. W., & Polyn, S. M. (2016). A predictive framework for evaluating models of semantic organization in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 119–140.
Norman, K. A., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611–646.
Osth, A. F., & Farrell, S. (2019). Using response time distributions and race models to characterize primacy and recency effects in free recall initiation. Psychological Review, 126(4), 578.
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129–156.
Purcell, B. A., Heitz, R. P., Cohen, J. Y., Schall, J. D., Logan, G. D., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1113–1143.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.
Schapiro, A. C., Turk-Browne, N. B., Botvinick, M. M., & Norman, K. A. (2017). Complementary learning systems within the hippocampus: a neural network modelling approach to reconciling episodic memory with statistical learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160049.
Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115(4), 893–912.
Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 67–70.
Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., Love, B. C., Palmeri, T. J., & Van Maanen, L. (2017). Approaches to analysis in model-based cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76, 65–79.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 192–196. Retrieved 2014-02-05, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03206482. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482
Wilks, S. S. (1938). The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 9(1), 60–62. Retrieved 2014-12-04, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2957648
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polyn, S.M. (2024). Assessing Neurocognitive Hypotheses in a Likelihood-Based Model of the Free-Recall Task. In: Forstmann, B.U., Turner, B.M. (eds) An Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45271-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45271-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45270-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45271-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)