Skip to main content

“Uncooking” the Cooked: How to Eat Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critique of Pure Nature

Part of the book series: Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress ((NAHP,volume 26))

  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

The food domain is traversed by a number of mythologies concerning nature. This chapter explores some relevant case studies, ranging from “clean eating” to aphrodisiac substances, from genetic manipulations to the so-called organic paradigm, in order to identify the main meaning-making processes underlying them and the effects of meaning resulting from them. After an initial theoretical framing, some of the most important trends in contemporary foodspheres are analysed through a semiocultural approach, based on the discussion of significant examples and relevant literature in the considered field of studies. This offers crucial insights on the discursivisation of nature in food-related discourses and practices, pointing out a series of crucial inconsistencies and problematic aspects related to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, as Greimas (1983) effectively pointed out, it is essential to remark that these are not ontological realities. Raw food (e.g. a salad, a fruit salad, a beef tartare), in other terms, is not “natura”, but means “nature”; similarly, cooked food (e.g. bread, a steak, a risotto), being more elaborate, means “culture”; and rotten food (e.g. particular types of cheese, beers, etc.), which is a natural transformation of raw materials—sometimes requiring particularly refined techniques—, stands between these two poles. The nature/culture opposition, in other words, necessarily relies on an effect of meaning resulting from different perceptions of the degree of elaboration of foods: the more they are elaborated, the more they are perceived as “cultural”; the less they are, the more they are perceived as “natural” (Marrone 2017: 24). However, as this chapter shows, this fact tends to be generally neglected or disregarded.

  2. 2.

    As Lévi-Strauss noted, in fact, two levels can be distinguished: “the boundary between nature and culture … puts the roasted and the smoked on the side of nature, the boiled on the side of culture as to means; or, as to results, the smoked on the side of culture, the roasted and the boiled on the side of nature” (Lévi-Strauss 1965, Engl. Trans. 2013: 46). In other words, “it would seem as if the prolonged enjoyment of a cultural product involved, sometimes on the level of ritual and sometimes on that of myth, a corresponding concession in favour of nature: when the result is long-lasting, the means must be precarious, and vice versa” (Lévi-Strass 1968, Engl. Trans. 1978: 489).

  3. 3.

    See in particular Lévi-Strauss (1965), cf. Buosi (2004), Stano (2015a).

  4. 4.

    In fact, the consumption of organic products is often stressed as a crucial aspect of clean eating as a reassurance that they are as unprocessed and “natural” as possible. See infra, Sect. 5.3, for a dedicated section on the discursivisation of nature and naturality as related to the organic paradigm.

  5. 5.

    According to the definition provided in the dictionary, a “whole food” is “a natural food and especially an unprocessed one” (Merriam-Webster 2022, my emphasis). Camille Adamiec also stressed this dimension in her analysis of the development of healthy food trends: “les produits raffinés ont perdu tous leurs nutriments, leurs vitamines, leurs oligoéléments soit l’ensemble de leurs vertus pour la santé. Si «les aliments, pour être parfaitement assimilés, doivent comporter l’ensemble équilibré dont les a dotés la nature» (Valnet 2010 [1985], p. 63), par contraste, les produits industriels sont au mieux des produits morts dans le sens où ils n’ont plus d’effets sur l’organisme, au pire des produits maléfiques puisqu’ils détruisent le corps et l’empoisonnent progressivement” (Adamiec 2013: 62) [Refined products have lost all their nutrients, their vitamins, their trace elements, namely all of their health benefits. If ‘to be perfectly assimilated, foods must include the balanced whole with which nature has endowed them’ (Valnet 2010 [1985], p. 63), by contrast, industrial products areat best—dead products, since they no longer have any effect on the body; or—at worst—harmful products, since they destroy the body and poison it gradually, my translation].

  6. 6.

    https://www.healthyhabithhi.com/blog/wholefood-vs-processed (Accessed: 4 December 2022).

  7. 7.

    Reprinted and expanded in 2014 as Wheat Belly Total Health (Davis 2014).

  8. 8.

    And even a real conspiracy theory, see Stano (2016, 2021c).

  9. 9.

    Despite its ubiquity in the mass and especially new media discourses, there is no official or legal definition of the term “superfood” (EUFIC 2012). While increasing efforts have been made to regulate the use of nutrition and health claims in food marketing to ensure that food’s labelling, presentation and advertising is clear and accurate (consider, for instance, the regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 issued by the European Union), several new, generally exotic products have been increasingly celebrated as “superfoods”, becoming largely diffused in Western markets, even though the exceptional nutrient content ascribed to them is not supported by scientific evidence.

  10. 10.

    Niola (2015: Chap. 2) provocatively argues that if once man made his diet, now it is the diet that “makes” man.

  11. 11.

    Refer to the discussion on orthorexia (see infra).

  12. 12.

    Gyorgy Scrinis criticised this phenomenon as the ideology of nutritionism: “Nutrition scientists, dieticians, and public health authorities—the nutrition industry, for short—have implicitly or explicitly encouraged us to think about foods in terms of their nutrient composition, to make the connection between particular nutrients and bodily health, and to construct “nutritionally balanced” diets on this basis. … This focus on nutrients has come to dominate, to undermine, and to replace other ways of engaging with food and of contextualizing the relationship between food and the body (Scrinis 2008: 39; see also Scrinis 2013). Pollan (2008) also insisted on the problems brought about by this new way of looking at food, focusing in particular on the case of margarine.

  13. 13.

    In fact, as illustrated by Quattrociocchi and Vicini (2016), users involved in a community are more likely to focus on specific topics and viewpoints, “isolating themselves” from their surroundings, that is to say, from alternative topics and viewpoints.

  14. 14.

    In fact, clean eating has been increasingly described as a “post-truth cult” (Wilson 2017), namely “part of a post-truth culture, whose adherents are impervious, or even hostile, to facts and experts” (Ibidem) and hence favour personal experience over scientific data (see Fivian and Wood 2019).

  15. 15.

    Now rebranded as “The Balanced Blonde”, after a radical change in her habits and image (see infra).

  16. 16.

    https://thebalancedblonde.gumroad.com/l/theblondevegancleanse?layout=profile (Accessed: 30 November 2022).

  17. 17.

    As a consequence of her unbalanced diet, Younger’s hair started falling out, her skin turned orange and she lost her period. A huge debate was raised by her 2014 post “Why I’m Transitioning Away from Veganism” (https://thebalancedblonde.com/2014/06/23/why-im-transitioning-away-from-veganism/), not without ideological distortions and manipulations of her message. What is relevant to consider in relation to the issues described in this chapter is her recognition of her “disordered eating habits” and the unhealthy regimen of food restrictions sha had fallen into.

  18. 18.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p034s2dx (Accessed: 30 November 2022).

  19. 19.

    https://archive.org/details/BBCHorizonCleanEatingTheDirtyTruthFullDocumentary (Accessed: 29 November 2022).

  20. 20.

    E.g. Deliciously Ella (Woodward 2015), Deliciously Ella Every Day (Woodward 2016), Deliciously Ella With Friends (Woodward 2017).

  21. 21.

    “We asked the Hemsley sisters, who cut out all grains, to take part in this film, and they refused. In a statement, they told us, ‘Grains are already abundant in the modern diet so our recipes celebrate other ingredients’. They told us they don’t believe in absolutes and no one way of eating suits everyone” (Clean Eating: The Dirty Truth, 22’ 41’’–22’ 54’’).

  22. 22.

    Consider, for instance, the European Directive 2001/18/CE (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32001L0018), the American National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard (2018, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/21/2018-27283/national-bioengineered-food-disclosure-standard), and the popular the NON-GMO Project (https://www.nongmoproject.org).

  23. 23.

    For a detailed description and analysis, see Stano 2021b: 52–53. On the communication of organic products and naturality, see also Marrone (2011) and Ventura Bordenca (2012).

  24. 24.

    As said by Pope John Paul II, quoted by Lyman (2000).

  25. 25.

    Available at https://www.coldiretti.it/economia/consumi-gia-200mila-firme-contro-cibo-in-provetta (Accessed: 30 November 2022).

  26. 26.

    Whose variable denomination (ranging from expressions such as “clean”, “animal-free”, “slaughter-free” products to “cultivated”, “cultured”, “synthetic”, “craft”, “artificial” foods”) is also particularly interesting as related to the mythologies of naturality in the food domain (see in particular Buscemi 2015; Szejda et al. 2019; Bertero et al. 2023).

  27. 27.

    Whose inclusion is particularly relevant also on the plastic level: while the pictures used for “natural foods” suggest an effect of reality, in fact, sketches and drawings rather mark a detachment from it.

  28. 28.

    In fact, as Niola (2012) and Ortoleva (2019) observed, the representation of science and technology as manifestations of a dysphoric culture daring to go beyond the limits of humanity, eventually succumbing to its own creations, is a widespread modern mythology.

  29. 29.

    This paragraph builds on the research presented in the mentioned paper, selecting and further expanding the issues and examples that are particularly relevant to the purposes of this book.

  30. 30.

    Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRI3Q3ESKN8 (Accessed: 30 November 2022).

  31. 31.

    Building on the Greimassian opposition between the subjective level, which is related to the perspective of the subject, and the objective level, which rather stresses socially and inter-subjectively recognised values, as well as on the contrast between a relative and an absolute dimension, Ferraro (1998) identified four “discursive regimes”. In the causal regime, the emphasis is put on objective facts, and what one does defines what one is. In the positional regime, instead, what one is defines what one does; this is the realm of tradition and socially recognised roles. The third discursive regime is the perspective regime, which is based on the refusal of any external definition, in a subjective perspective. Finally, the multiperspective regime consists in grasping other people’s desires and breaking into their narrative programs as a value-object, combining different perspectives.

  32. 32.

    Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9_lDREniYU (Accessed: 30 November 2022).

  33. 33.

    I.e. a world’s fair dedicated to food, with respect to different aspects, from sustainability of agricultural practices to haute cuisine, from culinary traditions to eating disorders, etc.

  34. 34.

    http://www.ladietamediterranea.eu (Accessed: 30 October 2022).

  35. 35.

    “Sfondo antico su cui, da Goethe in poi, è stata disegnata l’immagine della modernità”.

  36. 36.

    https://www.thegentlemansjournal.com/10-best-aphrodisiac-foods/ (Accessed: 4 December 2022).

  37. 37.

    https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/g1022/aphrodisiac-foods-0509/ (Accessed: 4 December 2022).

  38. 38.

    https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/aphrodisiac-foods (Accessed: 4 December 2022).

  39. 39.

    From Ancient Greek ἀϕροδισιακός (aphrodisiakós), derived from Αϕροδίτη (“Aphrodite”), the term aphrodisiac, referred to food, in fact etymologically refers to substances “stimulating sexual desire” (Oxford Dictionary 2022).

  40. 40.

    More specifically, according to Hesiod’s Theogony, the goddess Aphrodite was generated precisely from sea foam, made fertile by Uranus’ testicles, which had been hurled into the Aegean waters by Kronos (Ieranò 2019).

  41. 41.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/15/movies/film-review-candy-power-comes-to-town.html, 15 December 2020 (Accessed: 4 December 2022).

  42. 42.

    For a detailed analysis, see Stano (2018): 51–62.

  43. 43.

    In fact, in most countries in Central and Latin America, hot chocolate is prepared using water, not milk, as it was in ancient times.

References

  • Adamiec, Camille. 2013. Alimentation santé: de la prescription alimentaire à l’éthique de vie. La construction progressive des représentations du manger sain. E|C VII (14): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angela, Alberto. 2012. Amore e sesso nell’antica Roma. Milan: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertero, Alessandro, Stefano Biressi, Francesco Buscemi, Luciano Conti, Matteo Cresti, Cesare Gargioli, Luca Lo Sapio, Barbara Lucia Loera, Cristina Poncibò, and Simona Stano. 2023. We need an informed discussion on cultivated meat. Technical, social, and humanities specialists call for measured discussion on the future of food. Nature Italy, Apr 17. https://www.nature.com/articles/d43978-023-00056-1. Accessed 30 June 2023.

  • Boutaud, Jean-Jacques. 2013. Dimagrire in regime mediatico. In Dietetica e semiotica. Regimi di senso, ed. Gianfranco Marrone and Dario Mangano, 19–37. Milan-Udine: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Steven. 1997. The health food eating disorder. Yoga Journal (September-October), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Steven, and David Knight. 2001. Health Food Junkies. Orthorexia Nervosa: Overcoming the Obsession with Healthful Eating. New York, NY: Broadway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressanini, Dario, and Beatrice Mautino. 2015. Contro natura: Dagli OGM al “bio”, falsi allarmi e verità nascoste del cibo che portiamo in tavola. Milan: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscemi, Francesco. 2015. New meat and the media conundrum with nature and culture. Lexia 19–20: 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buosi, Chiara. 2004. La cucina d’autore. Un’analisi sociosemiotica delle cucine di La Madonnina del pescatore, L’Esguard, El Bulli. E|C, 1–24. http://www.ec-aiss.it/includes/tng/pub/tNG_download4.php?KT_download1=339e7338596a6ba4b9249029dba8f319. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  • Calefato, Patrizia. 2006. Lussi e lussurie alimentari. In Semiofood. Comunicazione e cultura del cibo, ed. Giovanni Manetti, Paolo Bertetti and Alessandro Prato, 175–191. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camporesi, Piero. 1989. I balsami di Venere. L’erotismo in Europa dal Medioevo al Settecento. Milan: Garzanti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras Hernández, Jesús, and Joan Ribas Serra. 2016. Are nutrients also good to think? Semiotica 211: 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrett, Natasha and Vicki Edgson. 2012. Honestly Healthy: Eat with Your Body in Mind, the Alkaline Way. London, UK: Jacqui Small LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danieli, Francesco. 2019. “Per eccitar Venere” o “Per dirizzar la verga”. La dieta afrodisiaca nei trattati leonardiani sul cibo dell’amore. Idomeneo 28: 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, William. 2011. Wheat Belly: Lose the Wheat, Lose the Weight, and Find Your Path Back to Health. New York, NY: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, William. 2014. Wheat Belly Total Health: The Ultimate Grain-Free Health and Weight-Loss Life Plan. New York, NY: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Vicario, Michela, Gianna Vivaldo, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook. Scientific Reports 6: 37825. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep37825. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  • Douglas, Mary. 1972. Deciphering a meal. Daedalus 101 (1): 61–81. Reprinted in Id. 1975. Implicit Meanings, 249–275. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • EUFIC (European Food Information Council). 2012. What are superfoods and are they really super? https://www.eufic.org/en/healthy-living/article/the-science-behind-superfoods-are-they-really-super. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  • FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 1999. Organic agriculture. Report of the Committee on Agriculture, Fifteenth Session. Rome, Jan 25–29. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjrrqu4wtj7AhX-iv0HHYZQDPwQFnoECAwQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fao.org%2Funfao%2Fbodies%2Fcoag%2Fcoag15%2Fdocs%2FX0075E.doc&usg=AOvVaw3a665Q4g_lUPVWp0pJbRMC. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  • Ferraro, Guido. 1998. L’emporio dei segni. Rome: Meltemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivian, Emily, and Carly J. Wood. 2019. The roles of social media, clean eating and self-esteem in the risk of disordered eating: A pilot study of self-reported healthy eaters. International Journal of Food, Nutrition and Public Health 10: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Joanne. 1999. Chocolat. London: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, Algirdas J. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, Algirdas J. 1983. La soupe au pistou ou la construction d'un objet de valeur. In Du sens II, 157–169. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1971 [1962]. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. 5. Neuwied/Berlin: Auflage. English Trans. Burger, Thomas, with the assistance of Lawrence, Frederick. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ieranò, Giorgio. 2019. Il mare d’amore. Eros, tempeste e naufragi nella Grecia antica. Bari-Rome: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger, Alejandro. 2009. Clean: The Revolutionary Program to Restore the Body’s Natural Ability to Heal Itself. New York, NY: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, Ancel. 1980. Seven Countries. A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landowski, Eric. 2003. Passions sans nom. Essais de socio-sémiotique III. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Rachel. 2004 [2000]. Birth of the modern diet. Scientific American 283 (2): 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Nigella. 2015. Simply Nigella: Feel Good Food. Chicago, IL: Flatiron Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1962. Le totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF. English Trans. Needham, Rodney. 1963. Totemism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1964. Mythologiques I. Le cru et le cuit. Paris: Plon. English Trans. Weightman, John and Doreen. 1969. The Raw and the Cooked. New York, NY, and Evanston, IL: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1965. Le triangle culinaire. L’Arc 26: 19–29. Reprinted in Le Nouvel Observateur Hors-Série (2009), 14–17. http://palimpsestes.fr/textes_philo/levi_strauss/triangle_culinaire.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2022. English Trans. Brooks, Peter. 2013. The culinary triangle. In Food and Culture: A Reader, ed. Carole Counihan and Penny Van Esterik, 40–47. New York, NY, and London, UK: Routledge.

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1968. Mythologiques III. L’origine des manières de table. Paris: Plon. English Trans. Weightman, John and Doreen. 1978. The Origin of Table Manners. New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Jurij M. 1984. O ceмиocфepe. Tpyды пo знaкoвым cиcтeмaм (Signs Systems Studies) 17: 5–23. English Trans. Clark, Wilma. 2005. On the semiosphere. Signs Systems Studies 33 (1): 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, Eric. 2000. Pope expresses opposition to GMOs: Cites need for ‘the respect of nature’. Bureau of National Affairs 221. http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/GEessays/PopeGMO.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  • Marrone, Gianfranco. 2011. Addio alla natura. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, Gianfranco. 2017. Cibo e linguaggio. Traduzioni e tradizioni. In Parole per mangiare. Discorsi e culture del cibo, ed. Irina Bajini, Maria Vittoria Calvi, Giuliana Garzone and Giuseppe Sergio, 19–34. Milan: LED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinis, Bruno. 1999. I fiori degli dei. Le erbe in magia e medicina. Bari: Dedalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, Margaret. 2016. Clean eating and the cult of healthism. British Medical Journal 354: i4095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanari, Massimo. 2016. Mangiare da cristiani: diete, digiuni, banchetti. Storie di una cultura. Milan: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi, Guido. 2006–2007. Biotechnologies, alimentary fears and the orthorexic society. Tailoring Biotechnologies 2 (3): 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi, Guido. 2007. Lost food. Comunicazione e cibo nella società ortoressica. Catania: Ed.it.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niola, Marino. 2012. Miti d’oggi. Milan: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niola, Marino. 2014. Prefazione. In Moro, Elisabetta, La dieta mediterranea. Mito e storia di uno stile di vita, 7–11. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niola, Marino. 2015. Homo dieteticus. Viaggio nelle tribù alimentari. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortoleva, Peppino. 2019. Miti a bassa intensità. Racconti, media, vita quotidiana. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David. 2013. Grain Brain: The Surprising Truth About Wheat, Carbs, and Sugar—Your brain’s silent killers. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, Michael. 2008. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrociocchi, Walter, and Antonella Vicini. 2016. Misinformation. Guida alla società dell’informazione e della credulità. Milan: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, Tosca. 2007. The Eat-Clean Diet. Mississauga, ON: Robert Kennedy Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodale, Maria. 2010. Organic Manifesto: How Organic Food Can Heal Our Planet, Feed the World, and Keep Us Safe. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis, Gyorgy. 2008. On the ideology of nutritionism. Gastronomica 8 (1): 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis, Gyorgy. 2013. Nutritionism: The Science and Politics of Dietary Advice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 1818. Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor, & Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2015a. Eating the Other. Translations of the Culinary Code. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2015b. From nutrients to foods: The alimentary imaginary of the mediterranean diet. Essachess—Journal for Communication Studies 8, 2 (16): 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2016. Tell me what you do not eat, and i shall tell you what you are. Food, health, and conspiracy theories. Lexia 23–24: 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2018. I sensi del cibo. Elementi di semiotica dell’alimentazione. Rome: Aracne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2021a. Beyond nutrition: Meanings, narratives, myths. In Food for Thought. Nourishment, Culture, Meaning, ed. Simona Stano and Amy Bentley, 147–158. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2021b. Food, health and the body: A biosemiotic approach to contemporary eating habits. In Food and Medicine: A Biosemiotic Perspective, ed. Victoria N. Alexander, Yogi H. Hendlin and Jonathan Hope, 43–69. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stano, Simona. 2021c. Il discorso alimentare tra teorie cospirative e mitologie del presente digitale: un approccio semio-culturale. In Trame nascoste. Teorie della cospirazione e miti sul lato in ombra della società, ed. Nicola Pannofino and Davide Pellegrino, 49–67. Milan-Udine: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szejda, Keri, Courtney Dillard, and Tessa Urbanovich. 2019. Initial consumer perceptions of cellular agriculture nomenclature: A qualitative analysis of word associations. GFI Academic papers. https://gfi.org/images/uploads/2020/01/Dec-2019-CM-Nomenclature-Qual-Study-Word-Associations-FINAL-REPORT.pdf?pi_content=6be253415f92d884a69c564ba671b6d2dd3224232c29250fbf5fe78da0898dd0. Accessed 14 June 2023.

  • Tandoh, Ruby. 2016. The unhealthy truth behind ‘wellness’ and ‘clean eating’. VICE, May 13. https://www.vice.com/en/article/jm5nvp/ruby-tandoh-eat-clean-wellness. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.

  • Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2012. Mediterranean diet. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/RL/00884. Accessed 14 Nov 2022.

  • UNESCO. 2013. Mediterranean diet. http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/RL/00884. Accessed 14 Nov 2020.

  • Valnet, Jean. 2010 [1985]. Se soigner par les légumes, les fruits et les céréales. Paris: Ed. Libraire Maloine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura Bordenca, Ilaria. 2012. Nature in vendita. Il packaging dei prodotti biologici. In Semiotica della natura (Natura della semiotica), ed. Gianfranco Marrone, 277–306. Milan-Udine: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura Bordenca, Ilaria. 2015. “Questa non è una dieta”. Linguaggi e strategie del dimagrimento. In Buono da pensare, ed. Gianfranco Marrone, 199–236. Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization). 2014. 3. Is the safety of GM foods assessed differently from conventional foods? Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/food-technology/faq-genetically-modified-food/en/. Accessed 12 Nov 2022.

  • Wilson, Bee. 2017. Why we fell for clean eating. The Guardian, Aug 11. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/aug/11/why-we-fell-for-clean-eating. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

  • Woodward (Mills), Ella. 2015. Deliciously Ella. London: Yellow Kite—Hachette UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward (Mills), Ella. 2016. Deliciously Ella Every Day. London: Yellow Kite—Hachette UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward (Mills), Ella. 2017. Deliciously Ella With Friends. London: Yellow Kite—Hachette UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Lauren A., Gareen Hamalian, and Neve Durrwachter. 2021. Virtue and disease: narrative accounts of orthorexia nervosa. In Food for Thought. Nourishment, Culture, Meaning, ed. Simona Stano and Amy Bentley, 171–182. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stano, S. (2023). “Uncooking” the Cooked: How to Eat Nature. In: Critique of Pure Nature. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45075-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics