Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Daylight Levels Using Simulation Calculation Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of CEE 2023 (CEE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 438))

  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

The focus of this article is the evaluation of light comfort in a specific attic space. Windows located in the perimeter wall as well as the roof contribute to ensuring this comfort. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the impact of various skylight configurations on the amount of daylight penetration in the designated area, with the aim of optimizing its utilization for human occupancy. Furthermore, indoor air temperature is influenced by the presence of daylight. During winter, thermal insulation properties adequately mitigate the situation as the packaging structures possess sufficient thermal resistance. However, in summer, inadequate heat storage capacity of these structures leads to overheating of the indoor air. This research investigates the relationship between the size of roof windows and the resulting microclimate within the attic space. Four different window size variants are analyzed and compared. The goal is to determine the optimal window size that effectively regulates the microclimate and ensures a comfortable environment in the attic area. The scenario without roof windows presents a viable option, particularly when lighting is solely provided through windows in the perimeter wall, as opposed to the roof. This configuration minimizes overheating but compromises daylight availability. To maximize daylight intake, the skylights should be positioned at the top of the roof. The study presents a graphical comparison of differences in daylight calculations obtained from different simulation tools. The analysis was conducted without considering window shading. The results highlight disparities between the outcomes produced by various simulation tools, accompanied by their justification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanner CK (2009) Effect of school design on student outcomes. J Educ Admin 47:381–399. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohapatra BN, Kumar MR, Mandal SK (2018) Analysis of daylighting using daylight factor and luminance for different room scenarios. Int J Civ Eng Technol 9:949–960. http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp

  3. Abdelatia B, Marenne CH, Semidor C (2010) Daylighting strategy for sustainable schools: case study of prototype classroom in Libya. J Sustain Develop 3:60–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v3n3p60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li DHW (2010) A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications. Appl Energy 87:2109–2118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Constanzo V, Evola G, Marletta L (2017) A review of daylighting strategies in schools: state of the art and expected future trends. Buildings 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020041

  6. Read A (2017) Integration of daylighting into educational (school) building design for energy efficiency, health benefit, and mercury emissions reduction using heliodor for physical modeling. Degree of Master of Architecture, Rochester Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10826&context=theses

  8. Katunský D, Zozulák M, Kondáš K, Šimiček J (2014) Numerical analysis and measurement results of a window sill. In: Advanced materials research, vol 899, pp 147–150. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.899.147

  9. Heschong L, Wright RL, Okura S (2013) Daylighting impacts on Human performance in school. J Illum Eng Soc 31:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.2002.10748396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicklas MH, Bailey GB (2012) Daylighting in schools: energy costs reduced… student performance improved. Strategic Plan Energy Environ 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10485236.1997.10530515

  11. Yang G, Yonghong Y (2016) Daylighting design in classroom based on yearly-graphic analysis. Sustainability 8:604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhart CH, Fitz A (2006) Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design. Energy Build 38:824–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards L, Torcellini P (2002) Literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants. Nat Renew Energy Labor Techn Rep 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2172/15000841

  14. Nocera F, Faro LA, Constanzo V, Raciti CH (2018) Daylight performance of classrooms in a mediterranean school heritage building. Sustainability 10:3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daylight with roof windows, fat-roof windows and modular skylights. Available online: https: www.velux.com

  16. Kuhlenengel M, Waters CE, Konstantzos I (2019) Assessing the impact of outside view on learning: a close look to EN 17037 ‘view out’ practices through the analysis of 220 classrooms. In: Journal of physics: conference series 2019, 1343. IOP Publishing, pp 012159

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tureková I, Lukáčová D, Bánesz G (2018) Quality assessment of the university classroom lighting—a case study. TEM Journal 7(4):829–836

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mathalamuthu AD, Ibrahim NLN, Ponniah V, Shafiei MWM, Ismail R (2018) Illuminance uniformity using public works department (PWD) standard design for public schools classroom design in Malaysia. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci 52(2):205–214

    Google Scholar 

  19. Irnawaty I, Rahim MR, Hamzah B, Jamala N (2019) Daylight intensity analysis of secondary school buildings for environmental development. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 2019, vol 382. IOP Publishing, p 012022

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashrafian T, Moazzen N (2019) The impact of glazing ratio and window configuration on occupants’ comfort and energy demand: the case study of a school building in Eskisehir, Turkey. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qahtan AM (2019) Daylight illuminance in classrooms adjacent to covered and uncovered courtyards under the clear sky of Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Emir J Eng Res 24(4):4. https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/ejer/vol24/iss4/4

  22. Lourenço P, Pinheiro MD, Heitor T (2019) Light use patterns in Portuguese school buildings: user comfort perception, behaviour and impacts on energy consumption. J Clean Prod 228:990–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwon CHW, Kang JL (2018) Integrated daylighting design by combining passive method with day sim in a classroom. Energies 11(11):3168. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cabeza-Lainez J, Almodovar-Melendo JM, Dominguez I (2019) Daylight and architectural simulation of the Egebjerg school (Denmark): sustainable features of a new type of skylight. Sustainability 11(21):5878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubiera ELG, Torija JGS, Frutos CB (2019) Zero cost conditioning techniques to improve the indoor environment of school buildings. Revista de la construcción 18(3):525–535. https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.18.3.525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costanzo V, Evola G, Marletta L, Pistone Nascone F (2018) Application of climate based daylight modelling to the refurbishment of a school building in Sicily. Sustainability 10(8):2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Galal KS (2019) The impact of classroom orientation on daylight and heat-gain performance in the Lebanese Coastal zone. Alex Eng J 58(3):827–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fang Y, Cho S (2019) Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance. Sol Energy 191:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lassandro P, Zonno M (2018) A work-related learning project for energy efficiency evaluation and indoor comfort of school buildings. Ingenierie des Systemes d’Information 23(5):7–27. https://doi.org/10.3166/isi.23.5.7-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanić M, Stanković D, Kondić S, Kankhva V (2018) Principles and implementation of daylighting systems in classrooms. In: Energy management of municipal transportation facilities and transport 2018. Springer, Cham, pp 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19868-8_70

  31. Zhong L, Yuan J, Fleck B (2019) Indoor environmental quality evaluation of lecture classrooms in an institutional building in a cold climate. Sustainability 11(23):6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bluyssen PM, Zhang D, Kurvers S, Overtoom M, Ortiz-Sanchez M (2018) Self-reported health and comfort of school children in 54 classrooms of 21 Dutch school buildings. Build Environ 138:106–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saraiva TS, Silva EM, Almeida M, Bragança L (2019) Comparative study of comfort indicators for school constructions in sustainability methodologies: schools in the Amazon and the southeast region of Brazil. Sustainability 11(19):5216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abdelhakim M, Lim YW, Kandar MZ (2019) Optimum glazing configurations for visual performance in Algerian classrooms under Mediterranean climate. J Daylighting 6(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2019.2

  35. Ma’bdeh S, Al-Khatatbeh B (2019) Daylighting retrofit methods as a tool for enhancing daylight provision in existing educational spaces—a case study. Build 9(7), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9070159

  36. Seyedolhosseini A, Masoumi N, Modarressi M, Karimian N (2020) Daylight adaptive smart indoor lighting control method using artificial neural networks. J Build Eng 29:101141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alwetaishi M, Taki A (2019) Investigation into energy performance of a school building in a hot climate: optimum of window-to-wall ratio. Indoor Built Environ 29(1):24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19842313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Afacan Y, Ranjbar A (2019) Impact of building massing on energy efficient school buildings. In: Sustainability in energy and buildings 2019. Springer, Singapore, pp 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_2

  39. Tian Z, Lin P, He Y, Jonsson JC (2020) A study of luminous environment with prism daylight redirecting fenestrations in classrooms. Indoor Built Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X19895566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kondáš K, Darula S (2014) Daylighting on the working plane in oriented attic rooms under overcast and clear sky. Select Sci Papers J Civ Eng 9(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/sspjce-2014-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Katunsky D, Dolnikova E (2019) Assessment of the working environment in terms of visual perception. In: International conference current issues of civil and environmental engineering Lviv-Košice–Rzeszów 2019. Springer, Cham, pp 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_18

  42. Dolnikova E (2019) Assessment of daylight in the selected office through simulation programs: a case study. E-GFOS 2019 10(18):82–92. https://doi.org/10.13167/2019.18.8

  43. Dolnikova E, Katunsky D (2019) Visual comfort assessment in the office: a case study. In: SGEM 2019 conference proceedings. 6.2. Nano, bio and green - technologies for a sustainable future: green buildings technologies and materials, green design and sustainable architecture, space technologies and planetary science, Sofia, STEF 92 Technology 2019, pp 597–604. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/6.2/S27.076

  44. Kittler R, Darula S (2013) Determination of time and sun position system. Sol Energy 93:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garcia DLR, Pereira FOR (2021) Daylight glare mitigation by internal shading devices use and effects on building

    Google Scholar 

  46. STN 730580 (2000) Daylighting in buildings, Part–1 basic requirements, 1986 Part–2; daylighting of residential buildings. Slovak Republic Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing: Bratislava, Slovakia

    Google Scholar 

  47. EN 12464-1 (2012) Light and lighting; lighting of work places-part 1: indoor work places. Slovak Republic Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing: Bratislava, Slovakia

    Google Scholar 

  48. https://www.velux.com/what-we-do/digital-tools/daylight-visualizer

  49. Hensen JLM, Lamberts R (2019) Building performance simulation for design and operation. Routledge Publisher, London, p 792. ISBN 13-9780-415-47414-6

    Google Scholar 

  50. https://www.airfal.com/en/dialux-light-planning/

  51. Hnilica R (2012) Porovnanie programov pre výpočty a simuláciu osvetlenia—Dialux a Relux. [online]. In: Světlo. Časopis pro světelnou techniku a osvětlováni, 2, s 25–29. ISSN 2121-0812

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Architectural Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Vysokoškolská 4, 042 00, Košice, Slovakia

    Erika Dolníková, Dušan Katunský & Zuzana Dická

Authors
  1. Erika Dolníková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dušan Katunský
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zuzana Dická
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika Dolníková .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

    Zinoviy Blikharskyy

  2. Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszow, Poland

    Piotr Koszelnik

  3. Faculty of Civil and Environment Engineering and Architecture, Rzeszów University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland

    Lech Lichołai

  4. Faculty of Civil and Environment Engineering and Architecture, Rzeszów University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland

    Piotr Nazarko

  5. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Košice, Slovakia

    Dušan Katunský

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dolníková, E., Katunský, D., Dická, Z. (2024). Comparison of Daylight Levels Using Simulation Calculation Tools. In: Blikharskyy, Z., Koszelnik, P., Lichołai, L., Nazarko, P., Katunský, D. (eds) Proceedings of CEE 2023. CEE 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44955-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44955-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44954-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44955-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation