Abstract
This chapter introduces the concept of Fuzzy MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison), an innovative Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) method. The chapter begins by providing a comprehensive overview of the MABAC method. To illustrate the practical implementation of MABAC, a numerical example is presented, utilizing crisp data. Building upon the understanding of MABAC, the chapter then explore the intricacies of fuzzy MABAC. The algorithm for fuzzy MABAC is elucidated and its handling in decision-making problems involving imprecise or uncertain data is demonstrated. To illustrate the efficacy of fuzzy MABAC, the method is applied to rank bank clerks according to four criteria. The step-by-step process of employing fuzzy MABAC to determine rankings is discussed. By the end of this chapter, readers will have a comprehensive understanding of both MABAC and fuzzy MABAC, and their practical applications in MADM. The numerical example and the real-life application in ranking bank clerks highlight the potential of fuzzy MABAC as an effective decision-making tool in complex scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Büyüközkan, G., Mukul, E., & Kongar, E. (2021). Health tourism strategy selection via SWOT analysis and integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP-MABAC approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 74, 100929.
Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 663–680.
Huang, G., Xiao, L., Pedrycz, W., Pamucar, D., Zhang, G., & Martínez, L. (2022). Design alternative assessment and selection: A novel Z-cloud rough number-based BWM-MABAC model. Information Sciences, 603, 149–189.
Liang, W., Zhao, G., Wu, H., & Dai, B. (2019). Risk assessment of rockburst via an extended MABAC method under fuzzy environment. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 83, 533–544.
Liu, H. C., You, J. X., & Duan, C. Y. (2019). An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 163–172.
Luo, S., Pedrycz, W., & Xing, L. (2022). Selection of data products: a hybrid AFSA-MABAC approach. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 1–19.
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016–3028.
Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89–106.
Pamučar, D., Puška, A., Stević, Ž, & Ćirović, G. (2021). A new intelligent MCDM model for HCW management: The integrated BWM–MABAC model based on D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 175, 114862.
Peng, X., & Yang, Y. (2016). Pythagorean fuzzy Choquet integral based MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(10), 989–1020.
Razipour-GhalehJough, S., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G., Rostamy Malkhalifeh, M., & Sharafi, H. (2020). Finding closest target for bank branches in the presence of weight restrictions using data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 288, 755–787.
Razipour-GhalehJough, S., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., & Sharafi, H. (2021). Benchmarking bank branches: A dynamic DEA approach. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 42(6), 1203–1236.
Shafiee, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Saleh, H., & Ghaderi, M. (2016). A mixed integer bi-level DEA model for bank branch performance evaluation by Stackelberg approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 12, 81–91.
Torkayesh, A. E., Tirkolaee, E. B., Bahrini, A., Pamucar, D., & Khakbaz, A. (2023). A systematic literature review of MABAC method and applications: An outlook for sustainability and circularity. Informatica, 1–34.
Wang, J., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2020). MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment. Defence Technology, 16(1), 208–216.
Xue, Y. X., You, J. X., Lai, X. D., & Liu, H. C. (2016). An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 703–713.
Yu, S. M., Wang, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). An interval type-2 fuzzy likelihood-based MABAC approach and its application in selecting hotels on a tourism website. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19, 47–61.
Acknowledgement
A special thanks to the Iranian DEA society for their unwavering spiritual support and consensus in the writing of this book. Your invaluable support has been truly remarkable, and we are deeply grateful for the opportunity to collaborate with such esteemed professionals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Allahviranloo, T., Pedrycz, W., Shahriari, M., Sharafi, H., Razipour GhalehJough, S. (2023). Multi Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) in Uncertainty Environment. In: Fuzzy Decision Analysis: Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1121. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44741-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44742-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)