Skip to main content

Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika: Die Auswirkungen von Globalisierung, Demokratie und Ungleichheit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika
  • 229 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Kämpfe marginalisierter Gruppen bieten Einblicke in den Zustand und die Qualität der Demokratie in einem Land. Dieses Buch wird die Kämpfe von fünf ausgewählten Gruppen untersuchen – die Ureinwohner, die städtischen Armen, Frauen, die LGBTQ+ Gemeinschaft und die verletzlichen Mittelschichten. Gemeinsam zeigen diese Gruppen einzigartige Kämpfe um Identität, Staatsbürgerschaft, Inklusion und Rechtsstaatlichkeit, die alle als grundlegend für das demokratische Wachstum betrachtet werden. Das Buch wird diese Kämpfe in einem Rahmen untersuchen, der die Auswirkungen von Demokratie, Ungleichheit und Globalisierung auf die Motivation, Kapazität und Möglichkeit zur politischen Auseinandersetzung berücksichtigt. Dieses Kapitel führt diesen Rahmen ein und bietet einen Überblick über die Literatur zu sozialen Bewegungen und politischen Kämpfen. Zusätzlich, um Hintergrundinformationen für die bevorstehende Analyse zu liefern, enthält dieses Kapitel auch eine kurze Geschichte Lateinamerikas sowie aktuelle Bedingungen von Demokratie, Ungleichheit und Globalisierung in der Region.

Die Forschung für dieses Buch wurde durch ein Sommerstipendium der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften an der California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, unterstützt. Ich bin Ino Rossi zutiefst dankbar, der die Buchreihe organisiert hat, die diesen Text enthält, und der detaillierte Kommentare zu dieser Arbeit gegeben hat. Ein besonderer Dank gilt auch Grace Ballard, die als meine Forschungsassistentin tätig war.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Der Freedom House Score ist eine Zusammenstellung von Scores von 1 bis 100 für politische Rechte (Qualität der Wahlen, Teilnahmerechte und Funktionieren der Regierung) und bürgerliche Freiheiten (Freiheiten der Meinungsäußerung, Vereinigung und Rechtsstaatlichkeit). Die aggregierten Länderscores werden dann in Bewertungen von 1–2 (frei), 3–4 (teilweise frei) oder 5–6 (nicht frei) umgerechnet.

Literatur

  • Almond, G., Bingham Powell, G., Dalton, R. J., & Strom, K. J. (2008). Comparative politics today: A world view. Pearson Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S., et al. (2017). Beyond civil society: Activism, participation, and protest in Latin America. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux, C. (2021). Democratic Latin America. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2021). Climate change: IPCC report is ‚code red for humanity‘. www.bbc.com/. Zugegriffen: 15. Nov. 2021.

  • Berg, R., & Seminario, M. (9. Juni 2021). Did Ortega just Kill Nicaragua’s democracy? Foreign Policy. www.foreignpolicy.com/. Zugegriffen: 2. Nov. 2021.

  • Berman, S. (16. August 2020). Why protests threaten dictatorships but make democracies stronger. Foreign Policy. www.foreignpolicy.com/. Zugegriffen: 15. Nov. 2021.

  • Brown, K. W. (2016). Colonial Andean Silver, the global economy, and indigenous labor in Peru’s Huancavelica mercury mines of death. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(3), 762–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2014). The economic history of Latin America since independence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmagnoni, M. (2011). The other West: Latin America from invasion to globalization. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales). (2016). Latin American state responses to social protest. CELS. www.cels.org.ar/. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • Christine-Doran, M. (2017). The hidden face of violence in Latin America: Assessing the criminalization of protest in comparative perspective. Latin American Perspectives, 44(5), 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S. (2016). What is global history? Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delicate, J. W., & Deluca, K. M. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan, W. M. (1992). The native population of the Americas in 1492. University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953). The political system. Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2016). The social inequality matrix in Latin America. Latin America. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2019a). Social Panorama of Latin America. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2019b). Fiscal Panorama of Latin America. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2020). Universalizing access to digital technologies to address consequences of Covid-19. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries)/ILO (International Labor Organization). (2019). Employment situation in Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • Flores-Macías, G., & Zarkin, J. (2019). The militarization of law enforcement: Evidence from Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 519–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankema, E. (2009). Has Latin America always been unequal? A comparative study of asset and income inequality in the long twentieth century. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the world. www.freedomhouse.org. Zugegriffen: 6. Nov. 2021.

  • Frum, D. (25. Oktober 2015). The false trade-off between liberty and security. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com. Zugegriffen: 19. Nov. 2021.

  • Galeano, E. (1997). Open veins of Latin America. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam et al. (Hrsg.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (S. 275–290). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargarella, R. (2013). Latin American constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The engine room of the constitution. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Jácome, J. (2011). Emergency powers and the feeling of backwardness in Latin American state formation. American University International Law Review, 26(4), 1073–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010). Change the world without taking power: The meaning of revolution today. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International IDEA. (2019). The global state of democracy 2019. International IDEA. www.idea.int. Zugegriffen: 19. Nov. 2021.

  • Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, P. (2018). The political economy of Latin America: Reflections on neoliberalism and development after the commodity boom. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroc Institute. (2021). Executive summary, the Colombian final agreement in the era of COVID-19: Institutional and citizen ownership is key to implementation. Notre Dame. www.peaceaccords.nd.edu. Zugegriffen: 18. Nov. 2021.

  • Latin News. (2021). NGOs in Latin America. In NGOs in Latin America – shaping the future? Latin America Special Report, SR 2022–02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, D. (2000). Imperfect balance: Landscape transformations in the Precolumbian Americas. Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. (1959). The passing of traditional society. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman, B. (1993). The constitution of tyranny: Regimes of exception in Spanish America. University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghin, H., & Ronin, E. (2018). Latin America’s golden era? Kingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlinar, Z. (1992). Globalization and territorial identities. Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, M. W. (2018). Protest state: The rise of everyday contention in Latin America. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, R. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion: A transformationalist perspective. Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, R. (2007). Globalization and contestation: The new great counter-movement. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (19. Januar 2020). As protests in South America surged, so did Russian trolls on Twitter, U.S. finds. www.nytimes.com. Zugegriffen: 16. Nov. 2021.

  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the internet worldwide. Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political action. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (2011). The future of power. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Boosting productivity and inclusive growth in Latin America. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264269415-en.

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orum, A. M. (1974). On participation in political protest movements. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(2), 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios Zuloaga, P. (2020). Judging inter-American human rights: The riddle of compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 47(2), 392–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Gutenberg. (2007). A brief account of the destruction of the Indies, by Bartolome de las Casas. www.gutenberg.org. (Original work published 1552). Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.

  • Rafay, J. R. (2021). Understanding the expansion of Latin America’s new social welfare regimes. Comparative Politics, 53(3), 549–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2007). The Blackwell companion to globalization. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1995). Globalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Hrsg.), Global modernities (S. 25–44). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. I. (2008). Latin America and global capitalism: A critical globalization perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, I. (Hrsg.). (2020). Challenges of globalization and prospects for an inter-civilizational world order. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schivelbusch, W. (1978). Railroad space and railroad time. New German Critique, 14, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahler-Sholk, R., Vanden, H. E., & Becker, M. (2014). Rethinking Latin American social movements: Radical action from below. Rownman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, H., & Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). A contingent effect of trust? In-group and outgroup trust and social movement participation in political context. Social Science Quarterly, 99(4), 1484–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, B., & Borland, E. (2013). Framing abortion rights in Argentina’s Encuentros Nacionales de Mujeres. Feminist Studies, 39(1), 194–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965–75. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French: Four centuries of popular struggle. Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Tilly, L. (1975). The rebellious century: 1830–1930. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2014). Social movements and governments in the digital age evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United National Development Program). (2020). Attitudes towards politics in Latin America. UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2018). In politics we trust…or not? Trusting and distrusting demonstrators compared. Political Psychology, 39(4), 775–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanden, H. E., Funke, P. N., & Prevost, G. (2017). The new global politics: Global social movements in the twenty-first century. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., et al. (2007). Genetic Variation and Population Structure in Native Americans. PLoS Genetics, 3(11), 2049–2067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post. (4. September 2020). Washington firm ran fake Facebook accounts in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Mexico, report finds. www.washingtonpost.com. Zugegriffen: 22. Nov. 2021.

  • Wieviorka, M. (2013). Social conflict. Current Sociology Review, 61(5/6), 696–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2021). The gradual rise and rapid decline of the middle class in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank. www.worldbank.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Nov. 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig L. Arceneaux .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arceneaux, C.L. (2024). Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika: Die Auswirkungen von Globalisierung, Demokratie und Ungleichheit. In: Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika. Springer VS, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44681-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44681-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44680-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44681-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics