Zusammenfassung
Die Kämpfe marginalisierter Gruppen bieten Einblicke in den Zustand und die Qualität der Demokratie in einem Land. Dieses Buch wird die Kämpfe von fünf ausgewählten Gruppen untersuchen – die Ureinwohner, die städtischen Armen, Frauen, die LGBTQ+ Gemeinschaft und die verletzlichen Mittelschichten. Gemeinsam zeigen diese Gruppen einzigartige Kämpfe um Identität, Staatsbürgerschaft, Inklusion und Rechtsstaatlichkeit, die alle als grundlegend für das demokratische Wachstum betrachtet werden. Das Buch wird diese Kämpfe in einem Rahmen untersuchen, der die Auswirkungen von Demokratie, Ungleichheit und Globalisierung auf die Motivation, Kapazität und Möglichkeit zur politischen Auseinandersetzung berücksichtigt. Dieses Kapitel führt diesen Rahmen ein und bietet einen Überblick über die Literatur zu sozialen Bewegungen und politischen Kämpfen. Zusätzlich, um Hintergrundinformationen für die bevorstehende Analyse zu liefern, enthält dieses Kapitel auch eine kurze Geschichte Lateinamerikas sowie aktuelle Bedingungen von Demokratie, Ungleichheit und Globalisierung in der Region.
Die Forschung für dieses Buch wurde durch ein Sommerstipendium der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften an der California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, unterstützt. Ich bin Ino Rossi zutiefst dankbar, der die Buchreihe organisiert hat, die diesen Text enthält, und der detaillierte Kommentare zu dieser Arbeit gegeben hat. Ein besonderer Dank gilt auch Grace Ballard, die als meine Forschungsassistentin tätig war.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Der Freedom House Score ist eine Zusammenstellung von Scores von 1 bis 100 für politische Rechte (Qualität der Wahlen, Teilnahmerechte und Funktionieren der Regierung) und bürgerliche Freiheiten (Freiheiten der Meinungsäußerung, Vereinigung und Rechtsstaatlichkeit). Die aggregierten Länderscores werden dann in Bewertungen von 1–2 (frei), 3–4 (teilweise frei) oder 5–6 (nicht frei) umgerechnet.
Literatur
Almond, G., Bingham Powell, G., Dalton, R. J., & Strom, K. J. (2008). Comparative politics today: A world view. Pearson Publishers.
Alvarez, S., et al. (2017). Beyond civil society: Activism, participation, and protest in Latin America. Duke University Press.
Arceneaux, C. (2021). Democratic Latin America. Routledge.
Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Sage Publications.
BBC. (2021). Climate change: IPCC report is ‚code red for humanity‘. www.bbc.com/. Zugegriffen: 15. Nov. 2021.
Berg, R., & Seminario, M. (9. Juni 2021). Did Ortega just Kill Nicaragua’s democracy? Foreign Policy. www.foreignpolicy.com/. Zugegriffen: 2. Nov. 2021.
Berman, S. (16. August 2020). Why protests threaten dictatorships but make democracies stronger. Foreign Policy. www.foreignpolicy.com/. Zugegriffen: 15. Nov. 2021.
Brown, K. W. (2016). Colonial Andean Silver, the global economy, and indigenous labor in Peru’s Huancavelica mercury mines of death. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(3), 762–771.
Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235.
Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2014). The economic history of Latin America since independence.
Carmagnoni, M. (2011). The other West: Latin America from invasion to globalization. University of California Press.
CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales). (2016). Latin American state responses to social protest. CELS. www.cels.org.ar/. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
Christine-Doran, M. (2017). The hidden face of violence in Latin America: Assessing the criminalization of protest in comparative perspective. Latin American Perspectives, 44(5), 183–206.
Conrad, S. (2016). What is global history? Princeton University Press.
Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27, 5–19.
Delicate, J. W., & Deluca, K. M. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333.
Denevan, W. M. (1992). The native population of the Americas in 1492. University of Wisconsin Press.
Easton, D. (1953). The political system. Alfred A. Knopf.
ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2016). The social inequality matrix in Latin America. Latin America. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2019a). Social Panorama of Latin America. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2019b). Fiscal Panorama of Latin America. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries). (2020). Universalizing access to digital technologies to address consequences of Covid-19. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
ECLAC (Economic Commission on Latin American Countries)/ILO (International Labor Organization). (2019). Employment situation in Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations. www.repositorio.cepal.org. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
Flores-Macías, G., & Zarkin, J. (2019). The militarization of law enforcement: Evidence from Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 519–538.
Frankema, E. (2009). Has Latin America always been unequal? A comparative study of asset and income inequality in the long twentieth century. Brill.
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the world. www.freedomhouse.org. Zugegriffen: 6. Nov. 2021.
Frum, D. (25. Oktober 2015). The false trade-off between liberty and security. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com. Zugegriffen: 19. Nov. 2021.
Galeano, E. (1997). Open veins of Latin America. Monthly Review Press.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gamson, W. A., & Meyer, D. (1996). Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam et al. (Hrsg.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (S. 275–290). Cambridge University Press.
Gargarella, R. (2013). Latin American constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The engine room of the constitution. Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
González-Jácome, J. (2011). Emergency powers and the feeling of backwardness in Latin American state formation. American University International Law Review, 26(4), 1073–1106.
Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell Publishing.
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press.
Holloway, J. (2010). Change the world without taking power: The meaning of revolution today. Pluto Press.
International IDEA. (2019). The global state of democracy 2019. International IDEA. www.idea.int. Zugegriffen: 19. Nov. 2021.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Kingstone, P. (2018). The political economy of Latin America: Reflections on neoliberalism and development after the commodity boom. Routledge.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.
Koehane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown and Company.
Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. University of Minnesota Press.
Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. Free Press.
Kroc Institute. (2021). Executive summary, the Colombian final agreement in the era of COVID-19: Institutional and citizen ownership is key to implementation. Notre Dame. www.peaceaccords.nd.edu. Zugegriffen: 18. Nov. 2021.
Latin News. (2021). NGOs in Latin America. In NGOs in Latin America – shaping the future? Latin America Special Report, SR 2022–02.
Lentz, D. (2000). Imperfect balance: Landscape transformations in the Precolumbian Americas. Columbia.
Lerner, D. (1959). The passing of traditional society. Free Press.
Loveman, B. (1993). The constitution of tyranny: Regimes of exception in Spanish America. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Maghin, H., & Ronin, E. (2018). Latin America’s golden era? Kingston.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.
Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman and Littlefield.
Mlinar, Z. (1992). Globalization and territorial identities. Avebury.
Moseley, M. W. (2018). Protest state: The rise of everyday contention in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
Munck, R. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion: A transformationalist perspective. Kumarian Press.
Munck, R. (2007). Globalization and contestation: The new great counter-movement. Routledge.
New York Times. (19. Januar 2020). As protests in South America surged, so did Russian trolls on Twitter, U.S. finds. www.nytimes.com. Zugegriffen: 16. Nov. 2021.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the internet worldwide. Cambridge university press.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political action. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Nye, J. (2011). The future of power. Public Affairs.
OECD. (2018). Boosting productivity and inclusive growth in Latin America. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264269415-en.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
Orum, A. M. (1974). On participation in political protest movements. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10(2), 181–207.
Palacios Zuloaga, P. (2020). Judging inter-American human rights: The riddle of compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 47(2), 392–433.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice Hall.
Project Gutenberg. (2007). A brief account of the destruction of the Indies, by Bartolome de las Casas. www.gutenberg.org. (Original work published 1552). Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2021.
Rafay, J. R. (2021). Understanding the expansion of Latin America’s new social welfare regimes. Comparative Politics, 53(3), 549–566.
Ritzer, G. (2007). The Blackwell companion to globalization. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Robertson, R. (1995). Globalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Hrsg.), Global modernities (S. 25–44). Sage Publications.
Robinson, W. I. (2008). Latin America and global capitalism: A critical globalization perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
Rossi, I. (Hrsg.). (2020). Challenges of globalization and prospects for an inter-civilizational world order. Springer.
Schivelbusch, W. (1978). Railroad space and railroad time. New German Critique, 14, 31–40.
Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Stahler-Sholk, R., Vanden, H. E., & Becker, M. (2014). Rethinking Latin American social movements: Radical action from below. Rownman and Littlefield Publishers.
Suh, H., & Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). A contingent effect of trust? In-group and outgroup trust and social movement participation in political context. Social Science Quarterly, 99(4), 1484–1495.
Sutton, B., & Borland, E. (2013). Framing abortion rights in Argentina’s Encuentros Nacionales de Mujeres. Feminist Studies, 39(1), 194–234.
Tarrow, S. (1989). Democracy and disorder: Protest and politics in Italy, 1965–75. Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French: Four centuries of popular struggle. Belknap.
Tilly, C., & Tilly, L. (1975). The rebellious century: 1830–1930. Harvard University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2014). Social movements and governments in the digital age evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 1–18.
UNDP (United National Development Program). (2020). Attitudes towards politics in Latin America. UNDP.
Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2018). In politics we trust…or not? Trusting and distrusting demonstrators compared. Political Psychology, 39(4), 775–792.
Vanden, H. E., Funke, P. N., & Prevost, G. (2017). The new global politics: Global social movements in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper and Row.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic.
Wang, S., et al. (2007). Genetic Variation and Population Structure in Native Americans. PLoS Genetics, 3(11), 2049–2067.
Washington Post. (4. September 2020). Washington firm ran fake Facebook accounts in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Mexico, report finds. www.washingtonpost.com. Zugegriffen: 22. Nov. 2021.
Wieviorka, M. (2013). Social conflict. Current Sociology Review, 61(5/6), 696–713.
World Bank. (2021). The gradual rise and rapid decline of the middle class in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank. www.worldbank.org. Zugegriffen: 21. Nov. 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arceneaux, C.L. (2024). Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika: Die Auswirkungen von Globalisierung, Demokratie und Ungleichheit. In: Politischer Kampf in Lateinamerika. Springer VS, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44681-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44681-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44680-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44681-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)