Abstract
The chapter focuses on the practices of correctional officers. In doing so, the chapter argues that correctional officers occupy a gray zone akin to Dubois’ description of bureaucrats. They effectively serve as the State’s arm and contribute to shaping the State’s proxemics, but they often develop a sense of betrayal toward the true bureaucrats—those who occupy offices with higher ranks, removed from the actual day-to-day work. The chapter provides numerous examples from fieldwork to illustrate the confusion in interpreting disciplinary bureaucracy as merely a punitive instrument rather than a precise and official resource for rectifying illegitimate situations. However, the discretionary nature of rewarding behaviors deserving positive appreciation does not appear to be limited to objective systems of regulation. While the presence of individuals in prison is justified in terms of demerit due to actions that have negatively impacted society according to the law, individuals are primarily judged for specific qualities that do not align with societal ideals. The chapter observes that correctional officers’ preference for informal practices over management and observational activities serves as a practical and efficient tool for mitigating the sense of diminished authority and the perception of being passive agents. Consequently, the punitive power of paperwork is weakened, and it is relegated to its most neglected function—to merely document, without real consequences—a bureaucratic function. The chapter extends the analysis by arguing that the enforcement of order, a competent performance governed by protocols and rules, is manifested differently within the same prison environment based on the gendered roles of correctional officers and prisoners. Gender norms impact the work of correctional officers and are reflected in their interactions with inmates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Article 15 of the penitentiary system, Law No. 354, identifies work as one of the elements of the rehabilitation treatment, establishing that, except in cases of impossibility, employment is guaranteed for both offenders and inmates.
References
Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569.
Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.
Britton, D. (1997, December). Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender and Society, 11(6), 796–818.
Chantraine, G., & Sallée, N. (2015). Ethnography of writings in prison: Professional power struggles surrounding a digital notebook in a prison for minors. In The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography (pp. 99–123). Palgrave Macmillan.
Crewe, B. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.
Denzin, N. K. (2002). Much ado about Goffman. The American Sociologist, 33(2), 105–117.
Dubois, V. (2014). The state, legal rigor, and the poor: The daily practice of welfare control. Social Analysis, 58(3), 38–55.
Dubois, V. (2016). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. Routledge.
Faccio, E., & Costa, N. (2013). The presentation of self in everyday prison life: Reading interactions in prison from a dramaturgic point of view. Global Crime, 14(4), 386–403.
Goffman, E. (1949). Presentation of self in everyday life. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 6–7.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
Pouliot, V. (2008). The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257–288.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
Wacquant, L. J. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological theory, 26- 63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franchi, S. (2024). Acting as Correctional Officer: Authority Through Discretionality. In: Doing Shifts. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44553-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44553-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44552-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44553-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)