Skip to main content

Being Correctional Officer: Unattended Expectations and Coping Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Shifts

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the configuration of correctional officers’ identity as professionals, with a focus on the reasons for choosing this career path. Whether correctional officers enter the job for job stability or because they genuinely believe in its mission, they find themselves in an environment they are ill-prepared for, one where they must cope with daily emergencies and adapt to profound complexity. Contrary to the conventional perception that the public sector offers job security, career growth potential, and retirement/health benefits, all contributing to a better quality of life and work-life balance, working in the prison system jeopardizes these goals. The chapter presents the coping strategies employed by correctional officers to survive in a hostile environment, with a focus on the unique aspects of their context and their connection to the local community and social life. After introducing the dual nature of the use of discretion by correctional officers, seen both as a coping strategy to overcome perceived difficulties in achieving planned results and as a hindrance to their personal authoritativeness, the chapter illustrates how correctional officers’ exercise of authority shapes the quality of prison life. Finally, the chapter argues for the cultural and normative dimension of prison beliefs and values, which are shaped by correctional officers’ in-group narratives regarding the stereotypical image of a “respectful and deserving prisoner” specific to their local prison. Simultaneously, these beliefs have their roots in a shared universe of information about the differences between each prison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All the excerpts presented in the chapter are taken from the notebook and are reported as follows: the notes in the first person are transcribed in normal font style, while the quotations from correctional officers and prison operators are in italics.

  2. 2.

    Perry and Hondeghem describe public sector motivation as the desire to work for a particular type of organization, and public service motivation as the desire to engage in a specific type of work (Perry and Hondeghem, 2008: 220–221).

  3. 3.

    In 1968, Galli analyzed the Italian electoral geography by identifying territorial political subcultures (“white” and “red” areas) based on the ideological polarization between the two dominant parties in the Italian political landscape from the post-war years (1948) to the 1990s: the Christian Democracy (DC) and the Italian Communist Party (PCI) (Caciagli, 2011; Galli, 1968). The terms “red” and “white” regions continue to be employed to indicate the dominance of left-wing or right-wing parties.

  4. 4.

    In 1975, the Italian Ministries of Justice and Interior jointly established Article 41-bis of the Prison Administration Act, also known as the carcere duro—hard prison regime (Ordinamento Penitenziario, 1975). Article 41-bis has been applied to prisoners with the highest security risk in the prison system.

References

  • Bettelheim, B. (1947). Individual and mass behavior in extreme situations. In T.M. Newcomb & E.L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. (1995), Sex, violence, and supervision: A study of the prison as a gendered organization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. (1997, December). Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender and Society, 11(6), 796–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. (2003). At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caciagli, M. (2011). Subculture politiche territoriali o geografia elettorale? Società Mutamento Politica, 2, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. The Christopher Publishing House. Tr. It. La comunità carceraria, in Emilio Santoro, Carcere e società liberale. Giappichelli, 20042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, B. M. (1980). The keepers: Prison guards and contemporary corrections. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrick, P., Chibnall, J. T., & Rosso, M. (2001). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory—2 in police officer selection: Normative data and relation to the Inwald personality inventory. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(5), 484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, P. F., Guarneri, C., & Kelly, M. E. (2008). Reasons for choosing a police career: Changes over two decades. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 10, 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, G. (1968). (a cura di), Il comportamento elettorale in Italia. Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. J. (1997). The illusion of structure: A critique of the classical model of organization and the discretionary power of correctional officers. Criminal Justice Review, 22(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, T. R., Heim, R. B., & Holt, N. (1976). Personality patterns among correctional officer applicants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 786–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J., & Cressey, D. R. (1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurik, N. C., & Halemba, G. J. (1984). Gender, working conditions and the job satisfaction of women in a non-traditional occupation: Female correctional officers in men’s prisons. The Sociological Quarterly, 25(4), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, D. (1983). Why do people become police officers? A study of reasons and their predictions of success. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 11, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2000). Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2011). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 484–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Hondeghem, A. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. M. (1986). Sex and supervision: Guarding male and female inmates. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardelli, R., & Martin, K. (2017). Why corrections? Motivations for becoming a Canadian provincial or territorial correctional officer. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck, J. (1963). A critique of “thieves, convicts and the inmate culture.” Social Problems, 11(2), 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarzotti, C. (2009). Le “nuove” funzioni del carcere nella società del controllo. Antigone. Quadrimestrale di critica del sistema penale e penitenziario, 4(2–3), 208–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, L. Z., Safran, D. A., & Sbaratta, C. A. (2010). Reasons for choosing a correction officer career. Psychological Services, 7(1), 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1980). Authority. Alfred A. Knopf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J. (1999). Life on the installment plan: Careers in corrections. Corrections, 61(7), 84–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrente, G. (2014). Il ruolo dell’educatore penitenziario nel processo di criminalizzazione. Osservazioni da una ricerca sul campo. Studi sulla questione criminale, 9(1–2), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vianello, F. (2018). Norme, codici e condotte: la cultura del penitenziario. Gli attori sociali di fronte alla criticità dell’ambiente carcerario. Sociologia del diritto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, L. (1986). Women guarding men. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Franchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Franchi, S. (2024). Being Correctional Officer: Unattended Expectations and Coping Strategies. In: Doing Shifts. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44553-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44553-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44552-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44553-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics