Skip to main content

Argumentations and Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

This paper comments on John Corcoran’s “Argumentations and Logic,” in which his author proposes that logic is the study of argumentations. Since this view challenges the traditional hylomorphic interpretation of logic as the study of formal arguments, which he identifies to Quine’s definition as the systematic studies of tautologies, and it makes difficult to distinguish logic from the contemporary theory of argumentation, I have opened a third alternative proposing to distinguish argument from argumentation through a renewal of the ancient quinquepartite doctrine saying that any logical argument contains the minimal parts for being conclusive, while any argumentation also contains the proof that make either credible or valid the premises of an argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    International Colloquium “Aristotle’s logic: reception, transformation, and influence.” Instituto de Filosofía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, November 2007.

  2. 2.

    Cf. Alexander of Aphrodisias [1] p. 44, 15 and ff.

  3. 3.

    Both are a modus ponens: ((pq) ∧ p) |= q.

  4. 4.

    On this expression, cf. [5] II, i, 6.

Bibliography

  1. Alexander of Aphrodisias (1883), Alexandri in Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum Librum I Commentarium, M. Wallies (Ed.), in Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 2.1, Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander of Aphrodisias (1891), Alexandri in Aristotelis Topicorum libros octo commentaria. M. Wallies (Ed.), in Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. vol. 2.2, Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boethius (1988), Boethius’s In Ciceronis Topica. Traducción, notas e introducción por E. Stump. Ithaca/London: Cornell Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boethius (2004), Boethius’s De topicis differentiis. Traducción, con notas por E. Stump. Cornell Paperbacks: Cornell University Press. (1ª ed. 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boethius (1969), Severino Boezio De hypotheticis syllogismis. Testo, traduzione e commento de Obertello, Luca. Brescia: Paideia Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cicero in twenty-eight volumes. Vol.2: De Inventione. De Optimo Genere Oratorum. Topica [Loeb 386] (Hubbell, Harry Mortimer (1881-1971)).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corcoran, John. 1989. “Argumentations and logic”. Argumentation 3, pp. 17–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Corcoran, John. “A Bibliography: John Corcoran’s publications on Aristotle 1972-2015”. Aporía 10, 2015, pp. 73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fortenbaugh, William W. 1998. “Cicero, On Invention 1.51–77 Hypothetical Syllogistic and the Early Peripatetics”. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Łukasiewicz, J. 1975. Estudios de Lógica y Filosofía. A. Deaño (trad.). Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Texto original en: J. Łukasiewicz 1970. Selected Works. Ed. L. Borkowski. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Łukasiewicz, J. 1951. Aristotle's Syllogistic. From the standpoint of modern formal logic (1st ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aristotle. Analytica Priora. Ross, W.D. 1949. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. (A revised text with introduction and commentary) by W.D. Ross, Oxford 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23-31. 2006. I. Mueller Translation. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32-46. 2006. I. Mueller Translation. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Prof. Dr. Jean-Yves Beziau for his invitation to collaborate in this volume.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Correia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Correia, M. (2024). Argumentations and Logic. In: Madigan, T.J., Béziau, JY. (eds) Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44461-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics