Skip to main content

On Polish Rationalisms, Logic and Joy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

This paper deals with the relationship between logic and ethics, more specifically: the issue of the inseparability of logic and ethics. A strengthening of John Corcoran’s position is proposed. This reinforcement takes into account the assumption of rationality and two assumptions of nonrationality, which are used in the Poznań Methodological School. This enlargement is also based on the didactic practice of teaching logic.

But it is not the purpose of Logic to entangle, but to disentangle;

to set forth something not in a covert but in an open fashion.

I. Kant

I want to teach them that which at present so few understand,

and the preachers of fellowship in sorrow least of all:

– namely, fellowship in joy!

F.Nietzsche

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the term “tortured nominalist,” see [38, p. 52].

  2. 2.

    Just for the record, I also have to remind that the eighth chapter of Russell’s My Philosophical Development, devoted to the mathematical aspects of Principia Mathematica, contains the famous (at least among Polish logicians) passage: I used to know of only six people who had read the later parts of the book. Three of these were Poles, subsequently (I believe) liquidated by Hitler. The other three were Texans, subsequently successfully assimilated [4, p. 86].

  3. 3.

    See also [37, pp. 29–30]. Original version in German: Die scheinbar strengste und am festesten gefügte Wissenschaft, die Mathematik, ist in eine »Grundlagenkrisis« geraten. Der Kampf zwischen Formalismus und Intuitionismus geht um die Gewinnung und Sicherung der primären Zugangsart zu dem, was Gegenstand dieser Wissenschaft sein soll. See [25, p. 13].

  4. 4.

    Leśniewski’s systems are protothetics, ontology, and mereology. The system discussed in The Limits of Science was called rational semantics.

  5. 5.

    Jan Sleszyński [Russian: Иван Владиславович Слешинский] was a professor at the Imperial Novorossiysk University in Odessa and from 1911 to 1924 at the Jagiellonian University in Cracow.

  6. 6.

    For systematic presentations of Polish rationalisms, see, for example, [32, 33]. For the history of Polish Logic after WWII, see, for example, [26, 27]. For the concept of intercultural rationality, see, for example, [35].

  7. 7.

    For information on the Ajdukiewicz’s approach to dynamics and axiology of scientific knowledge, see, for example [28].

  8. 8.

    For these assumptions, see [18, pp. 175–176].

  9. 9.

    In the context of the relationship between logic and algebra, one should turn to a grand project by Jean-Yves Béziau. The final remark in [29] is If we think that logic is a subject different from algebra, it is clear that to understand logic through algebra will give only a partial comprehension of logic. Thus, it is of very high interest to develop a “Universal Logic,” a general Theory of logical structures, if we want to understand the very nature of logic, and according to which, logic may be simple.

  10. 10.

    The word art appears again later in this article.

  11. 11.

    ([14], p. 25). Original version in French: Théorie des ensembles, notation logique, calcul des propositions, théorie des quantifications, etc., ce sont là des choses qui, pour le mathématicien professionnel comme pour l‵étudiant normal en mathématiques, présentent bien peu d’utilé.

  12. 12.

    I realize, of course, that it is a strong assumption.

  13. 13.

    See also [36]: Man gewöhne sich aber nur erst daran, jede Erfahrung in ein dialektisches Frage- und Antwortspiel und in eine reine Kopfangelegenheit zu übersetzen: es ist erstaunlich, in wie kurzer Zeit der Mensch bei einer solchen Tätigkeit ausdorrt, wie bald er fast nur noch mit den Knochen klappert. Jeder weiß und sieht dies: wie ist es also nur möglich, daß trotzdem die Jünglinge keineswegs vor solchenKnochenmenschenzurückschrecken und immer von neuem wieder sich blindlings und wahl- und maßlos den Wissenschaften übergeben? [emphasis added – P. L.]

  14. 14.

    It is worth to emphasize that Alain (Émile Chartier) was a teacher of Simone Weil.

  15. 15.

    The text in only available in Spanish, so this is my translation.

  16. 16.

    Original version in Spanish: “Félix Grande: En Libro de Manuel, aparte de muchas otras cosas, Julio Cortázar interpreta, en relación con la política y la literatura, algo sustancial: que la revolución, la lucha política, no tiene que olvidar en ningún momento que está hecha para la alegría, que está hecha desde la nostalgia de la alegría hacia la obstinación de la alegría. Esta es una de las razones por las cuales el libro se ha visto agredido, pero también es una de las razones por las cuales el libro puede y debe ser definido.”

  17. 17.

    Original version in Spanish: “Yo sabía que ese tipo de reproches me sería hecho y asumí el riesgo, porque, como tú lo has dicho admirablemente, es inconcebible una revolución que no tenga por fin la alegría, entendiendo por alegría una cosa mucho más amplia: la supresión de todo lo que es dolor antes de la revolución, la supresión de todo lo que nos humilla, nos explota, nos aliena, nos distancia, nos mutila.”

  18. 18.

    For some remarks on another revolution, see, for example, [30]. For the problem of revolutions in logic, see, for example, [31, 34].

References

  1. Russell, B., Autobiography, London-New York, Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Russell, B., New Hopes for a Changing World, New York, Simon and Shuster, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, B., My Philosophical Development, New York, Simon and Shuster, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heidegger, M., Being and Time. A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Translated by J. Stambaugh, Albany NY, State University of New York Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steinhaus, H., Mathematician for All Seasons. Recollections and Notes. Vol. 1. (1887–1945). Translated by Abe Shenitzer. R. G. Burns, I. Szymaniec, A. Weron (Eds.), Basel, Birkhäuser, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sleszyński, J., Proof Theory according to University Lectures. Vol. II. S. K. Zaremba (Ed.), Cracow, Mathematics and Physics Club of Students of the Jagiellonian University, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kant, I., Kant’s Introduction to Logic, and His Essay on the Mistaken Subtilty of the Four Figures. Translated by T. K. Abbott, London, Longmans, Green, & Co., 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kmita, J., Problems in Historical Epistemology. Translated by M. Turner, Warszawa – Dordrecht – Boston – Lancaster – Tokyo, Polish Scientific Publishers & D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rasiowa, H., Sikorski, R., The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Warsaw, National Scientific Publishers, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fitting, M., “A Tribute to Professor Helena Rasiowa,” in Logic at WorkLogic at work. Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa. E. Orłowska (Ed.), Heidelberg, NewYork, Physica Verlag, 1998, pp. v–viii.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bocheński, J., “What Has Logic Given to Philosophy?,” in Philosophical Logic in Poland Jan Woleński (Ed.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1994, pp. 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dewey, J., How We Think, Mineola NY, Dover Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Łukasiewicz, J., “The Shortest Axiom od The Implicational Calculus of Propositions.,” w J. Łukasiewicz, Selected Works. L. Borkowski (Ed.), Amsterdam & Warszawa, North-Holland Publishing Company & Polish Scientific Publishers, 1970, pp. 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thom, R., Paraboles et catastrophes. Entretiens sur les mathématiques, la science et la philosophie réalisés par Giulio Giorello et Simona Morini, Paris, Flammarion, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quine, W. V., Quiddities. An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, Cambridge MA, The Belknap Press, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham, R., Knuth, D. & Patashnik, O., Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nietzsche, F., Untimely Meditations. Daniel Breazeale (Ed.). Translated by R. J. Hollingday, Cambridge – New York – Melbourne – Madrid – Cape Town – Singapore – São Paulo Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K., Leśniewski, P., “On Non-Rationalities in the Foundations of the Humanities: A Hexagonal Analysis of the Counterrationality Principle,” Studia Metodologiczne, Vol. 35, pp. 168–182, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alain (Émile Chartier), Esquisse d’Alain. 2. La conscience morale. Cours dispensé au Collège Sévigny, 1930-1931, Paris, Les Presses universitaires de France, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Buber, M., Die Erzählungen der Chassidim, Zürich, Manesse Verlag, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smullyan, R. M., This Book Needs No Title, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tischner, J., Etyka i historia. Wykłady. (Ethics and History. Lectures). D. Kot (Ed.), Cracow, The Józef Tischner Institute, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eagleton, T., “Is Marxism a Theodicy?,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJePGD7D_RQ, 2010.

  24. Chesterton, G. K., The Autobiography of G. K. Chesterton, New York, Sheed & Ward, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heidegger, M., Sein und Zeit. Band 2, Gesamtausgabe, Unveränderter Text mit Randbemerkungen des Autors aus dem “Hüttenexemplar”, Hrsg. Fr. – W. von Herrmann, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wójcicki, R., Zygmunt, J., “Polish Logic in Postwar Period,” w Trends in Logic. 50 Years of Studia Logica, V. F. Hendricks, J. Malinowski (Eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2003, pp. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wójcicki, R., “The Postwar Panorama of Logic in Poland,” in Logic and Scientific MethodsLogic and Scientific Methods. Volume One of the Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 1995. M. L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, J. van Benthem (Eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1997, pp. 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K. Leśniewski, P., “Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz: nas Fontes Históricas da Dinâmica e Axiologia do Conhecimento Científico. (Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz: on the Historical Sources of the Dynamics and Axiology of Scientific Knowledge),” Kairos – Journal of Philosophy & Science, Vol. 10, pp. 79–108, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Béziau, J. – Y., “Can Logic Be Simple? Logic, Congruence and Algebra,” Logic and Logical Philosophy, Vol. 5, pp. 129–147, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leśniewski, P., “Hacia la siguiente revolución. Contribución a la cuestión de la responsabilidad. (Towards the next revolution. Contribution to the question of responsibility),” Analogía filosófica: revista de filosofía, investigación y difusión, tom 29, nr 1, pp. 31–51, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K., Leśniewski, P., “Bloody-minded Revolutions. (An Essay Inspired by the Wittgensteinian Jaha!),” in Let’s Be Logical. A. Moktefi, F. Schang, A. Moretti (Eds.), Cahiers de Logique et d’Epistemologie, Vol. 22, 2016, pp. 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marciszewski, W., “Scientific Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Pragmatic Rationalism as its Mainstream Trend,” in Interdisciplinary Investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw SchoolInterdisciplinary Investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw School. A. Drabarek, J. Woleński, M. Radzki (Eds.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 179–203.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ajdukiewicz K., “Logistic Anti-Irrationalism in Poland. Translated by P. Kwieciński.,” in Polish Philosophers of Science and Nature in the 20th CenturyPolish Philosophers of Science and Nature in the 20th Century, W. Krajewski (Ed.), Poznań, Amsterdam-New York:, Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 74, Rodopi, 2001, pp. 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hintikka, J., Sandu, G., “A Revolution in Logic?,” Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 169–183, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K., Leśniewski, P., ““The Kindly Ones” (Les Bienveillantes): Red Herrings in a Theory of Intercultural Rationality,” in Philosophical Challenges of Plurality in a Global World. D. Díaz-Soto, D. Manzanero, B. Thoilliez (Eds.), Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014, pp. 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nietzsche, F., “Schopenhauer als Erzieher (1874),” in Nietzsche, F. Unzeitigemässe Betrachtungen. Drittes und Viertes Stück. Kleinere Schriften 1872-1876. Gesammelte Werke. Band 7, München, Musarion Verlag, 1922, pp. 35–136.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heidegger, M., Being and Time. Translated by J. Macqarrie and E. Robinson, Oxford: Basil Balckwell, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Feferman, A. B., Feferman, S., Alfred Tarski. Life and Logic, Cambridge – New York – Melbourne – Madrid – Cape Town – Singapore – São Paulo, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fong-Torres, B. (1982). Steve Martin's New Song and Dance. The actor on his breakout dramatic role and year off from comedy. Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-features/steve-martin-comedy-1982-80065/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Leśniewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leśniewski, P. (2024). On Polish Rationalisms, Logic and Joy. In: Madigan, T.J., Béziau, JY. (eds) Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44461-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics