Abstract
Accurate early warning for rain-induced landslides is still challenging due to regional and local variations of rainfall prediction due to low accuracy, and resolution. The “Multi-Scale Simulator for the Geoenvironment (MSSG)” system, developed by the Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology and Waseda University allows for high-resolution simulations and seamless modeling of weather and climate interactions, and employs advanced meteorological aspects.
MSSG simulations compared with rainfall data recorded in the Aranayaka automated rain gauge for past events, including the devastating landslide in 2016. The simulations achieved satisfactory results in reproducing rainfall events. Higher-resolution simulations exhibited higher maximum rainfall intensity and cumulative rainfall accumulation. This study emphasizes the importance of considering finer scales in meteorological simulations to effectively capture the intricate variations associated with extreme rainfall events. This study places significant emphasis on the importance of considering finer scales in meteorological simulations in order to confirm the necessity of high resolutions to capture the temporal and spatial variations of orographic rainfall.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Landslide early warning
- Multi-scale weather simulation
- Orographic precipitation
- Turbulence enhancement of orographic rain
- High-resolution simulation
- Super-resolution
1 Introduction
In tropical regions, rainfall is one of the main triggering factors of landslides: Monitoring, early warning, and mitigation; all these three strategies are equally crucial for landslide disaster risk reduction. The current study is a case study from Aranyaka, Sri Lanka, where a devastating landslide occurred in the first monsoon of 2016, May 17th, causing severe human and economic loss. Even though the vulnerable area was already identified as a landslide high hazardous zone, adequate local early warning and evacuation advisories could not be performed timely. Sri Lanka receives high-intensity rainfall as a tropical island during two major monsoons each year: the first monsoon (South and Southwestern region) in May to September and the second monsoon (North and Northeastern region) in December to February. During these seasons, catastrophic landslides have occurred periodically, and records show an increasing tendency of events and losses.
Accurate rainfall prediction is necessary for reliable landslide early warning; therefore, high-resolution numerical weather simulations are important (Kamiya et al. 2019; Onishi et al. 2019). Numerical weather simulation permits mathematical modeling in global, regional, or local scale weather predictions for long-term and short-term forecasts based on current weather. Numerical weather simulation systems which are currently used for rainfall prediction in Sri Lanka, such as ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) providing 11 km resolution rainfall data and WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting Model) running with 9 km- and 3 km-resolution simulations, are still not strong enough in providing finer resolution rainfall predictions in landslide early warning perspective. No local weather simulation model is currently operating for rainfall forecasting in Sri Lanka. There need to be more local resources to ensure the safety of vulnerable communities on landslides.
Multi-Scale Simulator for the Geoenvironment (MSSG) (Takahashi et al. 2006, 2013), developed by the Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology and Waseda University, is a coupled non-hydrostatic atmosphere-ocean-land global circulation model that permits seamless simulations between weather and climate, serving high-resolution simulations. This MSSG can provide local rainfall predictions that can meet the need for the landslide early warning system in Sri Lanka. MSSG can be run as a multiscale numerical weather simulation model (Fig. 1). It allows to run global simulations with O(1–10 km) horizontal resolutions and regional simulations with O(100 m)–O(1 km) horizontal resolutions. MSSG is also developed to run local scale (urban scale) simulations with O(1 m) horizontal resolution resolving buildings and considering anthropogenic heat releases. In terms of the simulation scales, the high efficiency and reliability of MSSG have been confirmed in all scales using powerful supercomputers (Onishi et al. 2022). In global scale simulations, MSSG uses the Yin-Yang grid system (Kageyama and Sato 2004; Baba et al. 2010), which allows for overcoming the effect of polar singularity and lead to high computational efficiency. In the regional scale simulations, MSSG uses a conventional latitude-longitude system to allow using robust high-order differential schemes.
Scales of atmospheric simulations. The nesting domain system is used in MSSG multiscale simulations. (a) Global simulations use Yin-Yang grid system, (b) regional simulations use the conventional longitude-latitude orthogonal grid system, (c) local (urban) simulations allow building and residential topography resolved
High-resolution simulations are reliable, but at the same time, they require high computational costs. In case we develop an operational rainfall prediction system, the balance between reliability and computational cost. For example, an operational prediction system would be useless if it took 24 h for 24-h prediction. We usually need to compromise on reliability if we use an ordinary computer with limited performance unlike supercomputers. However, the current machine learning technology would relax the compromise in reliability. The deep-learning-based super-resolution technology would help increase the resolution, leading to better reliability at a low computational cost.
We assess the reliability of MSSG high-resolution simulations in comparison with the local observation data in Sri Lanka. We also discuss the potential of using machine-learning-based super-resolution in operational real-time rainfall predictions for landslide early warning systems.
2 Study Area
Figure 2 shows the map of Sri Lanka, centering the focus area of the present study, Aranayaka; more specifically, Samasarakanda in the Aranayaka Divisional Secretariate in the Kegalle District of Sri Lanka, where the devastating landslide occurred in 2016. The area is in the country’s central highlands and experiences high yearly rainfall during the southwestern monsoon yearly. An automated rain gauge recorded 426 mm cumulative for 58 h continued rainfall starting from 15th May 2016, which triggered the rapid landslide, which traveled downslope about 2 km air distance causing about 150 human losses.
3 Methodology
Three computational domains (parent, child and grandchild domains) were selected. The Center of the domains was set at Aranayaka, latitude 7.1541°N, and Longitude 80.4296°E for all the three domains. The parent domain size was selected to cover most of Sri Lanka. The landslide occurred on the slope of a mountain with the half-width of about 2 km. The horizontal resolution of the grandchild domain was set to 500 m considering the reasonable horizontal spacing on the scale of landslides and limitations due to the performance using a personal computer. Table 1 summarizes the horizontal settings, i.e., longitudinal and latitudinal settings. For the vertical coordinate, 32 grids with irregular intervals were set for all three nesting domains for the height of 30 km. These domain and grid sizes were determined considering the perspective and computer performance.
Numerical weather models compute the advection, i.e., transport of various tracers, including water substances such as water vapor, cloud water, rain, snow, cloud ice, and graupel (Miltenberger et al. 2015). For accurate computation in advection, the fifth Wicker-Skamarock (W-S) scheme was employed (Wicker and Skamarock 2002).
The six-category bulk cloud microphysics (MSSG-Bulk) (Onishi and Takahashi 2012) was employed to explicitly calculate the cloud dynamics.
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Five-Day Rainfall Simulation for the Aranayaka Landslide on May 2016
MSSG with the 8 km–2 km-500 m nesting grid system was performed for the rainfall from 00UTC on May 14 to 00UTC on May 19, 2016. Figure 3 shows the rainfall results from the MSSG simulation compared with the observed rainfall recorded in the automated rain gauge of the National Building Research Organization, Sri Lanka, located at Aranayaka. Table 2 summarizes the values of cumulative rainfall and maximum rainfall obtained from observation, GSMAP (the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation), and MSSG. As in the table, cumulative rainfall of 335.7 mm over 5 days was predicted through the simulation, while the observatory recorded 446.3 mm accumulation for the considered period. The maximum hourly average rainfall resulted as 22.7 mm/h through simulation, while the observatory recorded 26.8 mm/h. From the GSMAP data for the above period, cumulative rainfall of 192.0 mm and maximum hourly rainfall of 12.7 mm/h were recorded. When considering this 5-day rainfall event as a whole, the bell-shaped intensity distribution of the long-lasting continuous rainfall is compatible up to a reasonable extent between the observatory record and the MSSG simulation. Compared with the GSMAP, which provides global hourly rainfall at 0.1 × 0.1-degree resolution, which roughly corresponds to 10 km × 10 km horizontal resolution, based on satellite data, the MSSG simulation with 8 km–2 km-500 m resolutions provided closer values to the observatory record. This result confirms that high-resolution simulations are needed for better local rainfall predictions in mountainous areas.
The MSSG simulations conducted for the Aranayaka landslide event, utilizing the 8 km–2 km-500 m resolution, successfully reconstructed a rainfall event that aligned well with the observations from the observatory. Although there were variations in the timing and intensity of the rainfall peaks, the overall integration of the event yielded good results. It is worth noting that while comparing point data may have certain limitations, the analysis of the horizontal distribution of rainfall generated by the MSSG simulation indicates highly accurate and reliable predictions. This result suggests that even with the potential drawbacks of point data comparison, the simulation’s ability to depict the spatial distribution of rainfall is remarkably precise and dependable.
4.2 Rainfall Simulations for Past Heavy Rain Events on Aranayaka
Secondly, MSSG simulations were conducted to investigate six previous rainfall events with the high recorded rainfall accumulation in the Aranayaka rain gauge. Here we performed two sets of MSSG simulations to investigate the impact of increased resolution: One is with 8 km–2 km-500 m nesting grid system and the other with 8 km–2 km nesting grid system.
The results are summarized in Table 3. The findings revealed that the 8 km–2 km-500 m resolution simulation mainly exhibited higher maximum rainfall intensity and more significant overall rainfall accumulation than the 8 km–2 km resolution. In rare instances, the inverse trend is observed, though.
Figure 4 shows the rainfall comparison for event 3 (in Table 3), which resulted in very close values of maximum hourly precipitation and cumulative rainfall during the event. The values of (a) observatory data, (b) MSSG simulation with 8 km–2 km-500 m, (c) MSSG simulation with 8 km–2 km, and (d) GSMAP for maximum hourly average precipitation are, respectively, 16, 13.2, 4.4 and 7.48 mm/h, and for cumulative precipitation, they are, respectively, 114.5, 123.1, 41.1 and 25.81 mm/h. In terms of the timing of major rainfall, MSSG prediction shows the peak at a later time. This time shift can be partly explained by the initial condition of the MSSG simulation. The initial data, created from GSM data by the Japan Meteorological Agency, did not contain cloud substances. This prevents the simulation from producing rainfall in the early time. This initial problem can be solved if we restart the simulation from the previous simulation results. This time, we did not use this solution since we focused on the influence of the simulation resolutions.
The results obtained from the second step of reconstructing high-intensity rainfall events in the past shed light on an important finding: increasing the resolution of the simulations lead to higher values of maximum and cumulative rainfall.
Figure 5 illustrates the increasing accuracy of simulation with increasing resolution. This observation indicates that as the simulation resolution increases, it becomes more capable of capturing the local variations associated with local topography. The relationship between resolution and the ability to accurately represent precipitation patterns highlights the importance of considering finer scales in meteorological simulations to understand better and predict intense rainfall events. Moreover, this study showed that the MSSG simulations were generally successful in simulating the development of isolated or localized cumulonimbus clouds. However, when the size of these cumulonimbus clouds was relatively small or the duration of rainfall was short, reproducing their exact location through the MSSG simulations remained challenging. Nevertheless, from the current perspective, it is essential to note that landslides are typically not triggered by brief, isolated rainfall events but rather by prolonged periods of continuous rainfall or high-intensity rainfall with a significantly longer duration. The accumulation of water in the soil over time ultimately leads to an increase in mass and loss of cohesion, facilitating downslope movement or rapid erosion. Therefore, the challenges in reproducing the exact location of isolated cumulonimbus clouds do not significantly impact the accuracy of rainfall predictions in the context of landslide early warning systems.
Regional distribution of rainfall at the time of maximum rainfall through simulation showing the effect of increasing resolution in different domains, (a) 0C_parent domain which the grid size is 8 km × 8 km, (b) 1C_child domain which the grid size is 2 km × 2 km, (c) 2C_grand child domain which the grid size is 500 m × 500 m
5 Future Work
5.1 Turbulence Enhancement of Orographic Rainfall
This study used the “typical cloud model”, i.e., MSSG-Bulk, installed in MSSG simulation system. Recent research has proven that the turbulence enhancement of collision growth in orographic settings significantly impacts rainfall enhancement (Falkovich and Pumir 2007; Grabowski and Wang 2013; Onishi et al. 2015). The present MSSG have the “turbulence-aware cloud model”, developed by Seifert and Onishi (2016) and Onishi and Seifert (2016), which is capable of considering turbulence enhancement in orographic rainfall.
According to Seifert and Onishi (2016), and as illustrated in Fig. 6, turbulent enhancement in orographic rainfall can impact conversion rates among different categories, i.e., cloud droplet growth.
(a) Schematic illustration of turbulence enhancement of orographic rain, (b) interactions and processes among categories of warm cloud. Pauto represent amount of increase in raindrops due to collision of small water droplets and merger into large water droplets, and Paccr implies the amount of increase in raindrops due to large water droplets collecting and merging small water droplets. This two coalescence factors Pauto and Paccr are enhance due to turbulence
Autoconversion, Pauto, represents the conversion rate from the cloud-water category to the rain-water category due to collisions among cloud droplets. Accretion, Paccr, represents the conversions rate from cloud water to rain-water category due to collections of cloud droplets by rain drop.
The turbulence enhancement in drop collisions enlarges the two conversion rates, Pauto and Paccr. The present MSSG simulations did not use turbulence-aware cloud models and they are, therefore, not capable of considering turbulence enhancement. The impact of turbulence enhancement in past rainfall events should be assessed as a next step.
5.2 Super-Resolution Simulations
Downscaling techniques, including machine learning models such as artificial neural networks and support vector machines, are employed to enhance the spatial resolution of low-resolution models.
High-resolution (HR) numerical simulations offer superior predictive capabilities to low-resolution (LR) simulations but come at a higher computational cost. The super-resolution (SR) simulation system (Onishi et al. 2019) employs a two-step approach to reduce the computational cost for HR prediction information. Firstly, an LR simulation is conducted, and then the resulting LR prediction images are mapped to HR predictions using an SR method. This combination enables the system to provide HR predictions as reliable as those obtained from HR simulations while at a much smaller computational cost.
A recently introduced super-resolution (SR) neural network, as proposed by Yasuda et al. (2022), demonstrates its applicability in generating rainfall prediction maps. The SR network can utilize multiple input channels, such as a high-resolution topography map, to enhance the accuracy of the resulting high-resolution (HR) rainfall map and to widen the generality of the network. The SR neural network is trained using HR and low-resolution (LR) simulation results during the training phase. HR simulations, which are computationally intensive and performed on supercomputers, contribute to generating training data sets. In contrast, during operational use, LR simulations require significantly lower computational resources. This SR system holds promise for providing real-time prediction services to local communities needing more computational capabilities.
6 Conclusions
The Multi-Scale Simulator for the Geoenvironment (MSSG) offers a promising tool for enhancing regional simulations with high resolution. The MSSG simulation with an 8 km–2 km-500 m nesting grid system has demonstrated reasonably accurate rainfall predictions, particularly for investigating local orographic rainfall. Occasionally, less accurate rainfall predictions can be attributed to the challenge of reproducing the exact location of short-lived, isolated cumulonimbus clouds.
The MSSG provides more reliable rainfall data as the resolution increases. This study has revealed that by increasing the resolution from 8 km–2 km to 8 km–2 km-500 m, the cumulative rainfall and maximum hourly-average rainfall for specific events exhibit higher values, which align closer to the observed data. This finding establishes the reliability of the MSSG, paving the way for the confident implementation of fine-resolution simulations.
The real-time operation using the MSSG with an 8 km–2 km-500 m nesting grid system would require expensive computers. The deep-neural-network super-resolution technology would help to reduce the computational cost to produce high-resolution reliable predictions for orographic rainfall. This technology combination positions the MSSG as an effective tool for rainfall forecasting and early warning of landslides.
References
Baba Y, Takahashi K, Sugimura T, Goto K (2010) Dynamical core of an atmospheric general circulation model on a yin–yang grid. Monthly Weather Rev 138:3988–4005
Falkovich G, Pumir A (2007) Sling effect in collisions of water droplets in turbulent clouds. J Atmos Sci 64:4497–4505
Grabowski WW, Wang L-P (2013) Growth of cloud droplets in a turbulent environment. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 45:293–324
Kageyama A, Sato T (2004) The Yin-Yang grid: an overset grid in spherical geometry. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 5:Q09005
Kamiya T, Onishi R, Kodera S, Hirata A (2019) Estimation of time-course core temperature and water loss in realistic adult and child models with urban micrometeorology prediction. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:5097
Miltenberger AK, Seifert A, Joos H, Wernli H (2015) A Scaling relation for warm-phase orographic precipitation: a Lagrangian analysis for 2D mountains. Q J R Meteorol Soc 141:2185–2198
Onishi R, Seifert A (2016) Reynolds-number dependence of turbulence enhancement on collision growth. Atmos Chem Phys 16:12441–12455
Onishi R, Takahashi K (2012) A warm-bin-cold-bulk hybrid cloud microphysical model. J Atmos Sci 69:1474–1497
Onishi R, Matsuda K, Takahashi K (2015) Lagrangian tracking simulation of droplet growth in turbulence –turbulence enhancement of autoconversion rate. J Atmos Sci 72:2591–2607
Onishi R, Sugiyama D, Matsuda K (2019) Super-resolution simulation for real-time prediction of urban micrometeorology. SOLA 15:178–182
Onishi R, Hirai J, Kolomenskiy D, Yasuda Y (2022) Realtime high-resolution prediction of orographic rainfall for early warning of landslides. Book Series Int Consortium Landslides 1(1):2022
Seifert A, Onishi R (2016) Turbulence effects on warm-rain formation in precipitating shallow convection revisited. Atmos Chem Phys 16:12127–12141
Takahashi K, Peng X, Onishi R, Ohdaira M, Goto K, Fuchigami H, Sugimura T (2006) Multi-scale weather/climate simulations with multi-scale simulator for the geoenvironment (MSSG) on the Earth Simulator, Annual Report of the Earth Simulator Center, April 2005–March 2006, pp 31–39
Takahashi K, Onishi R, Baba Y, Kida S, Matsuda K, Goto K, Fuchigami H (2013) Challenge toward the prediction of typhoon behaviour and down pour. J Phys 454(012):072
Wicker LJ, Skamarock WC (2002) Time-split-ting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Monthly Weather Rev 130:2088–2097
Yasuda Y, Onishi R, Hirokawa Y, Kolomenskiy D, Sugiyama D (2022) Super-resolution of near-surface temperature utilizing physical quantities for real-time prediction of urban micrometeorology. Building Environ 209(108):597
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS), the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL), the National Building Research Organization (NBRO), Sri Lanka and the educational development through the Global Scientific Information and Computing Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bandara, H.A.A.I.S., Onishi, R. (2023). High Resolution Numerical Weather Simulation for Orographic Precipitation as an Accurate Early Warning Tool for Landslide Vulnerable Terrains. In: Alcántara-Ayala, I., et al. Progress in Landslide Research and Technology, Volume 2 Issue 2, 2023. Progress in Landslide Research and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44296-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44296-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44295-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44296-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)