Skip to main content

To Care for the Possible: Configuring Care in the Teledialogue Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas in Social Science Interventions

Abstract

In this chapter we revisit a research- and design project entitled Teledialogue in which we were actively engaged as action researchers and ethnographers. The project aimed at facilitating a frequent dialogue and interaction between vulnerable placed children and their social supervisors. Based on the work of Isabelle Stengers, we relate her conception of science as an inherently collective practice and as care for the possible to the question of careful engagement in the Teledialogue project. We suggest three examples of care as assemblage, installed and emergent. We propose that to act and think with care entails unsettling care in the general and think of it as a highly specific and situated event, which is why careful engagement entails that we develop our capacities to care for the possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, L. B., Danholt, P., & Lauritsen, P. (2018). Digitization and the distance between case managers and placed children in Teledialogue. STS Encounters, 10(2–3), 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Büscher, M., Gill, S., Mogensen, P., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Landscapes of practice: Bricolage as a method for situated design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 10(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of saint Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, E. V. (2015). Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102

  • de la Cadena, M., Lien, M. E., Blaser, M., Jensen, C. B., Lea, T., Morita, A., Swanson, H., Ween, G. B., West, P., & Wiener, M. (2015). Anthropology and STS: Generative interfaces, multiple locations. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(1), 437–475. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.1.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gad, C., & Bruun Jensen, C. (2009). On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243908329567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomart, E., & Hennion, A. (1999). A sociology of attachment: Music amateurs, drug users. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (Vol. 47, pp. 220–247). Blackwell/Sociological Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1990). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (1st ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience (1st ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00115.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2003). The promises of constructivism. In E. Selinger & D. Ihde (Eds.), Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for materiality (pp. 27–46). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2011). Fetish—Factish. Material Religion, 7(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.2752/175183411X12968355481935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Mol, A. (Eds.). (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Duke University Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maanen, J. V. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography (2nd ed.). University Of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1990). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03347.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2000a). For en demokratisering av vitenskapene. Spartacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2000b). The invention of modern science. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2011). The Care of the Possible: Isabelle Stengers interviewed by Eric Bordeleau (E. Bordeleau, Interviewer) [Interview]. http://www.scapegoatjournal.org/docs/01/01_Stengers_Bordeleau_CareOfThePossible.pdf

  • Stengers, I. (2013). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2017). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science (English ed.). Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, S. C., & Fedigan, L. M. (Eds.). (2000). Primate encounters: Models of science, gender, and society. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Danholt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Danholt, P., Andersen, L.B., Lauritsen, P. (2023). To Care for the Possible: Configuring Care in the Teledialogue Project. In: Lydahl, D., Mossfeldt Nickelsen, N.C. (eds) Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas in Social Science Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44119-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44119-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44118-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44119-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics