Abstract
Methods matter. We argue for methodography as a genre of care-ful interrogation of method practice. We systematically read three STS texts concerned with ethnographic methods published during the past decade and (meta)analyse how these texts account for their ethnographic encounters and these encounters’ frictions. Methodographic analysis contributes to ‘care-ful research’ in STS by analysing how, when and towards whom the cases textually perform care. With methodical sensibilities towards ‘care-ful method practice’ we suggest to diversify the conversation about ‘care’ that has been predominantly attended to as an empiric and/or theory-generating analytic notion in care studies in STS. We argue that methodography provides a flexible, infrastructure-building, analytical tool with the potential of adding another, method-focused layer of care.
With this chapter’s meta-methodographic analysis, we contribute to a better understanding about how STS researchers’ texts achieve care through and for methods, for research questions and agendas, as well as for their authors as researchers and their collaborators. We hope to bring empirical attention to the infrastructures that STS researchers mobilise to gather, process and analyse data or materials, and their ecologies of more or less careful practices. At the same time, we theorise what kinds of effects these practices enact, what the empirical is doing in these ecologies and speculate how methodographic reflections can ground more or differently careful and caring encounters with our collaborators in future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akrich, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2016). Pulling oneself out of the traps of comparison: An auto-ethnography of a European project. In I. J. Deville, M. Guggenheim, & Z. Hrdličková (Eds.), Practising comparison: Logics relations collaborations (pp. 130–165). Mattering Press, Manchester. https://doi.org/10.28938/9780993144943
Atkinson-Graham, M., Kenney, M., Ladd, K., Murray, C. M., & Simmonds, E. A.-J. (2015). Care in context: Becoming an STS researcher. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715600277
Callon, M., & Law, J. (2004). Introduction: Absence—presence, circulation, and encountering in complex space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1068/d313
Coopmans, C., & McNamara, K. M. (2020). Care in translation: Care-ful research in medical settings. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8193729
Deville, J., Guggenheim, M., & Hrdličková, Z. (2016). Practising comparison: Logics, relations, collaborations. Mattering Press, Manchester. https://doi.org/10.28938/9780993144943
Endaltseva, A., & Jerak-Zuiderent, S. (2021). Embodiment in ethnographic collaborations. Science & Technology Studies, 34(3), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.96101
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (5. Paperback print). Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick. ISBN 0202300285.
Greiffenhagen, C., Mair, M., & Sharrock, W. (2011). From methodology to methodography: A study of qualitative and quantitative reasoning in practice. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(3), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2011.009
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-6224-1.
Laurent, J., Human, O., Domínguez Guzmán, C., Roding, E., Scholtes, U., de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2021). Excreting variously, on contrasting as an analytic technique. In A. Ballestero & B. R. Winthereik (Eds.), Experimenting with ethnography: A companion to analysis. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478013211
Law, J. (2004). After method – Mess in social science research. Routledge. ISBN 9780415341752.
Law, J. (2010). Making a mess with method. Heterogeneities. http://heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2006MakingaMesswithMethod.pdf
Law, J. (2013). Collateral realities. In P. Baert & F. Domínguez Rubio (Eds.), The politics of knowledge. (1. Issued in paperback) (pp. 156–178). Routledge. ISBN 9780415704755.
Law, J. (2021). From after method to care-ful research (a foreword). In C. Addey & N. Piattoeva (Eds.), Intimate accounts of education policy research: The practice of methods. Routledge Research in Education Policy and Politics. Routledge. ISBN 9781003123613.
Law, J., & Lin, W. (2022). Care-ful research: Sensibilities from science and technology studies (STS). In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 127–141). SAGE. ISBN 9781526484321.
Law, J., & Ruppert, E. (2013). The social life of methods: Devices. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.812042
Law, J., Ruppert, E., & Savage, M. (2011). The double social life of methods. CRESC Working Paper Series, No 95. https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/7987
Lindén, L., & Lydahl, D. (2021). Care in STS (Editorial). NJSTS, 9(1), 77–12. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000
Lindén, L., & Singleton, V. (2021). Unsettling descriptions: Attending to the potential of things that threaten to undermine care. Qualitative Research, 21(3), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120976919
Lippert, I. (2020). In, with and of STS. In A. Wiedmann, K. Wagenknecht, P. Goll, & A. Wagenknecht (Eds.), Wie forschen mit den ‘Science and technology studies’? Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 301–318) Transcript, Bielefeld. ISBN 978-3-8376-4379-4.
Lippert, I., & Mewes, J. S. (2019). Special issue on “Ethnographic data generation in STS collaboration” [Call for papers]. https://web.archive.org/web/20220130102017/. https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/announcement/view/232
Lippert, I., & Mewes, J. S. (2021). Data, methods and writing. Science & Technology Studies, 34(3), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.110597
Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge. eBook ISBN 9780203927076.
Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript, Bielefeld. ISBN 978-3-8376-1447-3.
Murphy, M. (2015). Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136
Pinel, C., Prainsack, B., & McKevitt, C. (2020). Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720906567
Pols, J. (2004). Good care: Enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry. University of Twente, Twente. ISBN 90-5253-471-3.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis and London. ISBN 978-1-5179-0065-6.
Singleton, V., & Law, J. (2013). Devices as rituals. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2012.754365
Stengers, I. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.6
Viseu, A. (2015). Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715598666
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mewes, J.S., Lippert, I. (2023). Caring for Methods: ‘Care-Ful Method Practice’ through Methodography. In: Lydahl, D., Mossfeldt Nickelsen, N.C. (eds) Ethical and Methodological Dilemmas in Social Science Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44119-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44119-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44118-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44119-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)