Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology ((PSPP))

  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter presents some results of the various empirical surveys on populism that make up the volume. In this way, an overview is offered of the contribution that political psychology can provide by applying the constructs of social psychology to populism for the understanding of a diversified and contradictory phenomenon that animates many contemporary democracies. Particular attention is paid to the three pillars supporting the birth of political psychology and social psychology, which continue to operate in the contemporary psychology of populism, although differently from the past: crowd psychology, the psychology of the public, and the psychology of nation and race. Reflections related to political science, political philosophy, and sociology are addressed, helping to interpret the populist phenomenon. Together with this literature, there are cited the psychosocial aspects that distinguish left-wing and right-wing populism, the characterization of the populist mentality, the motivational constructs that precede populism, the conspiracy theories that accompany it, the possible redefinition of populist ideology, its interaction with the issues of uncertainty linked to the pandemic and war, communication on social media and the depiction of populist right-wing women politicians in their communication in the blogosphere. These aspects are addressed in the empirical surveys that make up the different chapters, which are briefly mentioned, underlining that they use both mainstream and critical methodologies in an ideal dialogue that enriches the study of populism. The conclusion is an appeal to political psychologists to be aware that, as stated by Michael Billig, doing political psychology is ‘doing politics’. 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In particular, it was the social psychologist William McDougall—known at Harvard for his racist theories (Boring, 1929/1950)—who inspired the USA Immigration Law Restriction of 1924.

  2. 2.

    I use the term women/men instead of females/males, usually used, e.g., female politician, to emphasize the social dimension versus the biological one. Indeed, women/men refer to gender, socially and culturally constructed, while female/male relates to sex, biologically founded, and therefore alluding to essentialist natural and immutable characteristics.

References

  • Akande, A. (Ed.). (2022). Handbook of racism, xenophobia, and populism: All forms of discrimination in the United States and around the globe. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). I rischi della libertà [The risks of freedom]. Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1983). Politica [Politics]. In N. Bobbio, N. Matteucci, & G. Pasquino (Eds.), Dizionario di politica (pp. 826–835). Utet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). Appleton Century Crofts. (Original work published in 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A. (1992). Was Wundt a `Nazi’?: Volkerpsychologie, racism and anti-Semitism. Theory & Psychology, 2(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354392022008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caiani, M., & Graziano, P. (2022). The three faces of populism in power: Polity, policies and politics. Government and Opposition, 57(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedroni, L. (2014). Politolinguistica. L’analisi del discorso politico [Political linguistics. The analysis of the political discourse]. Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Torre, C. (Ed.). (2019). Routledge handbook of global populism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act. Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186.

  • Diamanti, I., & Lazar, M. (2018). Popolocrazia. La metamorfosi delle nostre democrazie [Peoplecracy. The metamorphosis of our democracies]. Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., Foster, J., & Caillaud, S. (2015). Researching social representations. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 64–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.007

  • Forgas, J. P., Crano, W., & Fiedler, K. (Eds.). (2021). The psychology of populism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism, and global protest. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism. An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. ([1917] 2015). Odio gli indifferenti [I hate the indifferents]. Chiare Lettere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, B. (Ed.) (2021). Handbook on austerity, populism and the welfare state. Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745

  • Heinisch, R. C., Holtz-Bacha, C., & Mazzoleni, O. (Eds.). (2017). Political populism: A handbook. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Shepherd, S., Blatz, C. W., Chu, S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). For God (or) country: The hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 725–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B. (2003). Collective political action. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 670–709). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B., & Van Stekelenburg, J. (2013). Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 774–811). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Jasko, K., Chernikova, M., Dugas, M., & Webber, D. (2017). To the fringe and back: Violent extremism and the psychology of deviance. American Psychologist, 72(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. (1905). Psychologie des foules. Olean. (Original work published 1895)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucchi Faina, A. (2002). Psicologia collettiva. Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11

  • Mueller, J. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, M. (Ed.). (2022). The Palgrave handbook of populism. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palano, D. (2017). Populismo [Populism]. Editrice Bibliografica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul. Free Association Book. (Original work published 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2003). Power of freedom. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. A., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G. (Ed.). (2003). Percorsi teorico-critici in psicologia sociale [Theoretical-critical paths in social psychology]. Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G. (2005). Il campo della psicologia politica in una prospettiva psicologico-sociale [The field of political psychology in a psycho-social perspective]. In G. Sensales (Ed.), Rappresentazioni della “Politica”. Ricerche in psicologia sociale della politica (pp. 13–39). Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G. (2020). Italian social psychologies and fascist regimes: History of a collective removal. In O. Braddick (Editor in chief), Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology—History and systems of psychology (pp. 1–47). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G., & Dal Secco, A. (2014). Political psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1419–1425). Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G., & Di Cicco, G. (2024). The representations of Italian populisms on Facebook (2017–2019). The language of Luigi Di Maio and Matteo Salvini from a psychosocial analytical perspective. Psicologia Sociale—Social Psychology Theory Research, 1, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G., & Prislei, L. (2023). Sexism. In A. Nai, M. Groemping, & D. Wirz (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1–10). Edward Elgar Publishing. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensales, G., Areni, A., & Baldner, C. (2018). Politics and gender issues: At the crossroads of sexism in language and attitudes. An overview of some Italian studies. In G. Sáez, & I. Valor Segura (Eds.), Sexism: Past, present and future perspectives (pp. 1–68). Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sighele, S. (1891). La folla delinquente [The delinquent crowd]. Bocca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subedi, D. B., Brasted, H., von Strokirch, K., & Scott, A. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge handbook of populism in the Asia Pacific. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1901). L’opinion et la foule [The opinion and the crowd]. Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarchi, M. (2015). Italy: The promised land of populism? Contemporary Italian Politics, 7(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2015.1094224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., & McGarty, C. (2022). Collective action for social change: Individual, group, and contextual factors shaping collective action and its outcomes. In D. Osborne & C. G. Sibley (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of political psychology (pp. 492–507). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2019). Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulos, P., & Jost, J. T. (2020). Psychological similarities and dissimilarities between left-wing and right-wing populists: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in France. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 104004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Bélanger, J. J., Moyano, M., Trujillo, H. M., Gunaratna, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2018). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weltman, D., & Billig, M. (2001). The political psychology of contemporary anti- politics: A discursive approach to the end-of-ideology era. Political Psychology, 22(2), 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilda Sensales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sensales, G. (2024). Introduction. In: Sensales, G. (eds) Political Psychology Perspectives on Populism. Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44073-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics