Abstract
My attempt to deconstruct Heidegger’s metaphysics has deeply depended on the “discovery” of his onto-erotic interest for Judaism. This interest has often been implicit and required to be excavated with deconstructive tools—both by continuing and criticizing Derrida’s famous attempt in his study Of Spirit. A crucial point of my analysis was deconstructing the notion that ontological difference would be more original than sexual difference. Only in this respect can the deconstruction of Western metaphysics be really accomplished.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Mario Perniola, The Sex Appeal of the Inorganic (London: Bloomsbury, 2022), 12.
- 2.
Perniola, The Sex Appeal of the Inorganic, 20.
- 3.
Perniola, The Sex Appeal of the Inorganic, 84.
- 4.
Arendt—Heidegger, Corrispondence, 52–53.
- 5.
Hans A. Fischer-Barnicol, ‘Spigelungen – Vermittlungen,’ in Neske, Erinnerung, 95–96, quoted in Ott, Martin Heidegger: A Political Life, 167.
- 6.
Derrida, Glas, 47b.
- 7.
Karl Jaspers, Notizien zu Martin Heidegger, München, Piper, 1978, 18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dal Bo, F. (2023). Conclusion. In: Judaism, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis in Heidegger’s Ontology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44056-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44056-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44055-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44056-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)