Skip to main content

Curriculum Adaptation for Inclusion in Teaching and Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inclusion in Southern African Education

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

The democratisation of the South African curriculum after 1994, from the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) to the Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) has resulted in various changes. Mainstream teachers are forced to cope with Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) developments compelling them to integrate educational technologies (Ed-Tech) into the curriculum to enhance curriculum adaptation for Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSEN). In thus enhancing the curriculum, provision of Ed-Tech resources and other alternative measures were made available to teachers. Nevertheless, teachers are still reluctant in the use of Ed-tech resources to ensure connectedness during teaching and learning in enhancing effective curriculum adaptation for LSEN. This study therefore uses connectivism, the learning theory for the digital age, to seek a theoretical and a practical solution for teachers teaching LSEN. The theory offers a solution to enhancing the effective use of Ed-Tech for curriculum adaptation. This conceptual study argues that teaching without Ed-Tech competences to enhance connectedness during curriculum adaptation can lead to teachers’ lack of performance and failure to maintain good result. To curb this, the study posits that an Ed-Tech enhanced model of connected curriculum adaptation is a requirement in the context of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adewumi TM, Mosito C (2019) Experiences of teachers in implementing inclusion of learners with special education needs in selected Fort Beaufort District primary schools. S Afr Cogent Educ 6(1):1703446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adewumi TM, Rembe S, Shumba J, Adeola Akinyemi AA (2017) Adaptation of the curriculum for the inclusion of learners with special education needs in selected primary schools in the Fort Beaufort District. Afr J Disabil 6(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Adigun OT (2021) Inclusive education among pre-service teachers from Nigeria and South Africa: a comparative cross-sectional study. Cogent Educ 8(1):1930491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Zyoudi M, Al Sartwai A, Dodin H (2011) Attitudes of pre-service teachers towards inclusive education in UAE and Jordan (a comparative study). Int J Disabil Comm Rehabil 10(1):1063–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Amor AM, Hagiwara M, Shogren KA, Thompson JR, Verdugo MÁ, Burke KM, Aguayo V (2019) International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: a systematic review. Int J Incl Educ 23(12):1277–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amory A (2014) Tool-mediated authentic learning in an educational technology course: a designed-based innovation. Interact Learn Environ 22(4):497–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T (2016) Theories for learning with emerging technologies. Emer Technol Dist Educ 7(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade MS, Miller RM, McArthur D, Ogden M (2022) The impact of learning on student persistence in higher education. J Coll Stud Ret Res Theory Pract 24(2):316–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates A (2018) Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age in. Tony Bates Associates Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates- T (2017) Constructivism: chapter 2 teaching in a digital age. In. Tony Bates Associates Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell F (2011) Connectivism: its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 12(3):98–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Black P, William D (2009) Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Assess Eval Account (formerly: J Per Eval Educ) 21(1):5–31. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataika T, Mckenzie JA, Swart E, Lyner-Cleophas M (2012) Access to education in Africa: responding to the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Disabil Soc 27(3):385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choppin J (2013) Connecting teaching and learning in curriculum adaptations. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen DK (2011) Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dube B (2020) Rural online learning in the context of COVID 19 in South Africa: evoking an inclusive education approach. REMIE Multidiscipl J Educ Res 10(2):135–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery DW, Vandenberg B (2010) Special education teacher burnout and ACT. Int J Spec Educ 25(3):119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (2014) Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan M (1993) Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform, vol 10. Psychology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelmez-Burakgazi S (2020) Curriculum adaptation and fidelity: a qualitative study on elementary teachers’ classroom practices. Issues Educ Res 30(3):920–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierczyk M, Hornby G (2021) Twice-exceptional students: review of implications for special and inclusive education. Educ Sci 11(2):85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlalele D, Mosia M (2020) Teachers’ sense of community in rural learning ecologies. Alternation 27(2):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoadley U, Jansen J (2014) Curriculum: organizing knowledge for the classroom. Oxford University Press Southern Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist M, Lelinge B (2021) Teachers’ collaborative professional development for inclusive education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ 36(5):819–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ige OA, Hlalele DJ (2017) Effects of computer-aided and blended teaching strategies on students’ achievement in civic education concepts in mountain learning ecologies. Educ Inf Technol 22(6):2693–2709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly AV (2009) The curriculum: theory and practice. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal R, Kolte A, Pawar P, Martini E (2020) Breaking out of your comfort zone: an archival research on epistemology in inclusive education pedagogy for industry 4.0. Int J Educ Manag

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoza SB (2021) Exploring the migration to a digitalised curriculum at UKZN. Educ Sci 11(11):682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoza’ S (2015) Student teachers’ reflections on their practices of curriculum and assessment policy statement. S Afr J High Educ 29(4):179–197. https://doi.org/10.20853/29-4-512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen F, Kim Y, Greene W (2013) Teaching and learning from within: A core reflection approach to quality and inspiration in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121405

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann F, König J (2016) Teachers’ professional competence and wellbeing: understanding the links between general pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and burnout. Learn Instr 45:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehohla M, Hlalele D (2012) Inclusive classrooms: an ecosystemic perspective. J Hum Ecol 37(3):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C-YA, Rodriguez RC (2019) Evaluation of the impact of the Hyflex learning model. Int J Innov Learn 25(4):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makoelle TM (2020) Schools’ transition toward inclusive education in post-soviet countries: selected cases in Kazakhstan. SAGE Open 10(2):2158244020926586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makoelle TM, Burmistrova V (2021) Teacher education and inclusive education in Kazakhstan. Int J Incl Educ:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie J (2021) Intellectual disability in inclusive education in South Africa: curriculum challenges. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 18(1):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpungose C (2021) Lecturers’ reflections on use of zoom video conferencing technology for e-learning at a south African university in the context of coronavirus. Afr Identities:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpungose C, Khoza S (2021) Postgraduate students’ experiences on the use of Moodle and canvas learning management system. Technol Knowl Learn 27:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mpungose CB, Khoza SB (2022) Postgraduate students’ experiences on the use of Moodle and canvas learning management system. Technol Knowl Learn 27(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09475-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otukile-Mongwaketse M, Mangope B, Kuyini AB (2016) Teachers’ understandings of curriculum adaptations for learners with learning difficulties in primary schools in B otswana: issues and challenges of inclusive education. J Res Spec Educ Needs 16(3):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavizhi K, Saravanakumar A (2018) Curriculum for inclusive education. International Conference on Curriculum and Instructional Designing for Global Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar W (1975) Curriculum theorizing: the reconceptualists. McCutchan

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2012). Teachers as agents of change: an exploration of the concept of teacher agency. Incomplete

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy C, le Grange L (2017) Assessment and curriculum. In: Ramrathan L, Le Grange L, Higgs P (eds) Education studies: for initial teacher development. Juta & Company (Pty) LTD, pp 159–173. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061629-14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse M, Yakavets N (201410 towards inclusive education: swimming against the tide of educational reform. Education reform and internationalisation: The case of school reform in Kazakhstan, 196

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt E, Eilderts L (2018) Connected classrooms: videoconferencing in TESOL teacher preparation. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 30(2):290–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. Currency Books. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773x/97

  • Schwab S (2020) Inclusive and special education in Europe. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn N (2021) Ed-tech within limits: anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. E-Learn Dig Med 18(5):496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn N, O’Neill C, Smith G, Andrejevic M, Gu X (2021) A necessary evil? The rise of online exam proctoring in Australian universities, vol 186. Med Int Aust, pp 149–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens G (2005) Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. http://www.elearnspace.org. Retrieved 28 Mar from https://jotamac.typepad.com/jotamacs_weblog/files/Connectivism.pdf

  • Siemens G (2007) Connectivism: creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In: Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples. Waxmann, pp 53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens G (2008) Learning and knowing in networks: changing roles for educators and designers. ITFORUM Discuss 27(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens G (2014) Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. J Emerg Technol Web Intell 2(1):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens G, Downes S (2009) Connectivism and connective knowledge 2009. Int J Inst Technol Dist Learn 2(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba H (1962) Curriculum development: theory and practice. Brace & World

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler R (1949) Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226820323.001.0001

  • van den Akker J, Kuiper W, Hameyer U (2003) Curriculum landscapes and trends. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker J, de Boer W, Folmer E, Kuiper W, Letschert J, Nieveen N, Thijs A (2009) Curriculum in development. En: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemse K, Venketsamy T, Swanepoel N (2022) Support teachers need to assist learners experiencing mathematical learning difficulties. Book of proceedings–long papers, 179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenda R, Dlamini R (2022) Examining factors that influence teachers to adopt information and communication technology in rural secondary schools: an empirical study. Educ Inf Technol 28:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research on which this chapter is based is funded through a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (New York) (Grant Number: 1910-07226).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cedric Bheki Mpungose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mpungose, C.B. (2023). Curriculum Adaptation for Inclusion in Teaching and Learning. In: Hlalele, D., Makoelle, T.M. (eds) Inclusion in Southern African Education. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43752-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43752-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43751-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43752-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics