Skip to main content

The Need to Integrate Theory, Research, and Application Efforts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families with Adolescents

Abstract

The knowledge base created about families with adolescents over the past 15 years has been organized in this book as three separate parts according to work done on theory, research, and application topics, respectively. At the same time, the natural overlap of these theoretical, empirical, and application literatures was discussed wherever possible. This chapter makes the case for more systematic attempts to highlight the interconnectedness of these oft-separated scholarly works. Harkening back over three decades ago in the family literature, David Olson’s “triple threat” model for bridging theory, research, and application efforts is brought forward for consideration by scholars who think about, observe, and work with families with adolescents. This chapter begins by briefly reviewing some of the key points made in this earlier work and is followed by a discussion of some of the key factors that have served as barriers to the unification of these academic activities. This is followed by some concluding thoughts as to why the “triple threat” model is both applicable and advantageous to those scholars who study families with adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Crane, D. R., Wampler, K. S., Sprenkle, D. H., Sandberg, J. G., & Hovestadt, A. J. (2002). The scientist-practitioner model in marriage and family therapy programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 75–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D'Aniello, C., & Fife, S. T. (2020). A 20-year review of common factors research in marriage and family therapy: A mixed methods content analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(4), 701–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demo, D. H. (2008). From the editor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, D. R., & Gonzalez, C. (2005). Publication patterns of faculty in commission on accreditation for marriage and family therapy education programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C., & Distelberg, B. (2017). Developmental pedagogy in marriage and family therapy education: Preparing students to work across epistemologies. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrott, S. E., Stremmel, A. J., & Naar, J. J. (2019). Practice that transforms intergenerational programs: A model of theory-and evidence informed principles. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 17(4), 488–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. N., Miller, R. B., Bradford, A. B., & Anderson, S. R. (2017). The marriage and family therapy practice research network (MFT-PRN): Creating a more perfect union between practice and research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(4), 561–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karem, E. A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2010). The research-informed clinician: A guide to training the next-generation MFT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, F. W., & Hammerschmidt, H. (2014). Long term “good” marriages: The seemingly essential ingredients. In C. Therapy (Ed.), Multiple perspectives (pp. 15–38). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Y., Fawkner, S., & Niven, A. (2018). A grounded theory of how social support influences physical activity in adolescent girls. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1435099.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert-Shute, J. J., Nguyen, H. N., Peterson, P. W., & Pirasteh, A. B. (2019). Reflecting on the past: A content analysis of family therapy research from 2000-2015. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45(2), 256–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, Y., & Dollahite, D. C. (1991). The linkage between theory and research in family science. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. E., & Nichols, W. C. (2010). The doctoral education of professional marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 259–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyness, K. P. (2020). Training and credentialing in the profession of marriage and family therapy. The Handbook of Systemic Family Therapy, 1, 555–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L. (1998). Using the US land-grant system as a model to attack this nation’s crime problem. The. Criminologist, 23, 1–4. Accessed July 12, 2010, from http://www.asc41.com/March-April%201998.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • McWey, L. M., West, S. H., Ruble, N., Handy, A. K., Handy, D. G., Koshy, M., et al. (2002). The practice of clinical research in accredited marriage and family therapy programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. L. (1976). Bridging research, theory, and application: The triple threat in science. In D. H. L. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships (pp. 565–579). Graphic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsof, W. M., & Wynne, L. C. (2000). Toward progress research: Closing the gap between family therapy practice and research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. G., Johnson, L. N., Robila, M., & Miller, R. B. (2002). Clinician identified barriers to clinical research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmied, V., & Walsh, P. (2010a). Effective casework practice with adolescents: Perspectives of statutory child protection practitioners. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmied, V., & Walsh, P. (2010b). Effective casework practice with adolescents. Perspectives of statutory child protection practitioners. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, D. H. (1976). In my opinion: The need for integration among theory, research, and practice in the family field. The Family Coordinator, 25, 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, R. J. (1989). The need for integration among theory, research, and application in family science: An update. Family Relations, 38, 220–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak-Hunter, L., Berge, J., Lister, Z., Davey, M., Lynch, L., & Denton, W. (2014). Medical family therapy scientist-practitioners. In J. Hodgson, A. Lamson, T. Mendenhall, & D. Crane (Eds.), Medical family therapy: Advanced applications (pp. 219–240). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gavazzi, S.M., Lim, JY. (2023). The Need to Integrate Theory, Research, and Application Efforts. In: Families with Adolescents. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43407-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics