Skip to main content

The Role of Data Sharing in Transboundary Waterways: The Case of the Helmand River Basin

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theorizing Transboundary Waters in International Relations

Abstract

While data and information exchanges theoretically play an effective role in the decision-making process of a shared watercourse, in practice, there are several challenges that prevent riparians from sharing data in an effective and cooperative manner. This chapter seeks to assess why the riparian nations of the Helmand River have failed to adopt an effective data exchange mechanism although both nations signed an internationally recognized bilateral water treaty in 1973. Applying a mixed study approach, the study draws on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to interpret the main obstacles of data sharing between Afghanistan, the upstream state, and Iran, the downstream state, of the Helmand River Basin. Using both secondary literature data and stakeholder interviews, this research found a number of specific factors that impede the ability of the riparian nations of the Helmand River to share data and information, such as national security, political instability, lack of capacity, negative emotions, pride, and historical factors. Our research suggests that these underlying elements have been under-estimated in the TPB models of data sharing at the transboundary level. Thus, borrowing from Wehn’s model (2003b), we have developed a modified version of TPB to unpack the challenges of data sharing between the riparian states of the Helmand River Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As only a small portion of the basin is situated in Pakistan, which is not part of the 1973 Helmand River Treaty, Pakistan is excluded from this analysis.

  2. 2.

    A normal water year, as defined in article 1 (c) of the Helmand River Treaty, is a year-long time period during which the flow of water at Dehrawud Station, located at Kajaki Dam, is at least 5,661 million cubic meters from 1 October to 30 September (Helmand River Treaty 1973).

  3. 3.

    Afghanistan also collected data between 2004–2010 at the Khwabgah and Chila-e Charkh Stations, however, according to the World Bank, that data is not reliable (World Bank 2018).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najibullah Loodin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loodin, N., Eckstein, G., Singh, V.P., Sanchez, R. (2023). The Role of Data Sharing in Transboundary Waterways: The Case of the Helmand River Basin. In: Szálkai, K., Szalai, M. (eds) Theorizing Transboundary Waters in International Relations. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43376-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics