Abstract
We revisit the computational complexity of decision problems about existence of Nash equilibria in multi-player games satisfying certain natural properties. Such problems have generally been shown to be complete for the complexity class \(\exists \mathbb {R}\), that captures the complexity of the decision problem for the Existential Theory of the Reals. For most of these problems, we show that their complexity remains unchanged even when restricted to win-lose games, where all utilities are either 0 or 1.
The second author is supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark under grant no. 9040-00433B. The third author is supported by funds for the promotion of research at University of Cyprus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To keep notation simple, we use \(\textsf{U}_i\) to denote both the utility of player i when some certain strategy profile is realized and the expected utility of player i when some mixed profile is played.
- 2.
The relative interior of \(\varDelta ^n\) is the set \(\textsf{relint}(\varDelta ^n) = \{ x \in \varDelta ^n \mid \textsf{N}_{\epsilon }(x) \cap \textsf{aff}(\varDelta ^n \subseteq \varDelta ^n\ \ \text{ for } \text{ some } \epsilon > 0 \}\), where \(\textsf{aff}(\varDelta ^n)\) is the affine hull of \(\varDelta ^n\) and \(\textsf{N}_{\epsilon }(x)\) is a ball of radius \(\epsilon \) centered at x.
References
Abbott, T.G., Kane, D.M., Valiant, P.: On the complexity of two-player win-lose games. In: FOCS, pp. 113–122 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2005.59
Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in games of perfect information. Pacific J. Math. 10(2), 381–417 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1960.10.381
Austrin, P., Braverman, M., Chlamtac, E.: Inapproximability of NP-complete variants of Nash equilibrium. Theory Comput. 9, 117–142 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4086/toc.2013.v009a003
Berthelsen, M.L.T., Hansen, K.A.: On the computational complexity of decision problems about multi-player Nash equilibria. Theory Comput. Syst. 66(3), 519–545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-022-10080-1
Bilò, V., Mavronicolas, M.: The complexity of computational problems about Nash equilibria in symmetric win-lose games. Algorithmica 83(2), 447–530 (2021)
Bilò, V., Mavronicolas, M.: \(\exists \mathbb{R} \)-complete decision problems about (symmetric) Nash equilibria in (symmetric) multi-player games. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 9(3), 14:1-14:25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3456758
Blanc, M., Hansen, K.A.: Computational complexity of multi-player evolutionarily stable strategies. In: Santhanam, R., Musatov, D. (eds.) CSR 2021. LNCS, vol. 12730, pp. 1–17. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79416-3_1
Blum, L., Shub, M., Smale, S.: On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: NP-completeness, recursive functions and universal machines. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 21(1), 1–46 (1989)
Bürgisser, P., Cucker, F.: Exotic quantifiers, complexity classes, and complete problems. Found. Comput. Math. 9(2), 135–170 (2009)
Buss, J.F., Frandsen, G.S., Shallit, J.O.: The computational complexity of some problems of linear algebra. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 58(3), 572–596 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1998.1608
Canny, J.F.: Some algebraic and geometric computations in PSPACE. In: STOC, pp. 460–467. ACM (1988). https://doi.org/10.1145/62212.62257
Chen, X., Deng, X., Teng, S.H.: Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. J. ACM 56(3), 14:-14:57 (2009)
Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: New complexity results about Nash equilibria. Games Econom. Behav. 63(2), 621–641 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2008.02.015
Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P.W., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. SIAM J. Comput. 39(1), 195–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1137/070699652
Deligkas, A., Fearnley, J., Melissourgos, T., Spirakis, P.: Approximating the existential theory of the reals. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 125, 106–128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.10616/j.jcss.2021.11002
Deligkas, A., Fearnley, J., Savani, R.: Inapproximability results for constrained approximate Nash equilibria. Inf. Comput. 262, 40–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic2018.06.001
Erickson, J., van der Hoog, I., Miltzow, T.: Smoothing the gap between NP and \(\exists \mathbb{R} \). In: FOCS, pp. 1022–1033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00099
Etessami, K., Yannakakis, M.: On the complexity of Nash equilibria and other fixed points. SIAM J. Comput. 39(6), 2531–2597 (2010)
Garg, J., Mehta, R., Vazirani, V.V., Yazdanbod, S.: \(\exists \mathbb{R} \)-completeness for decision versions of multi-player (symmetric) Nash equilibria. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 6(1), 1:1–1:23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3175494
Gilboa, I., Zemel, E.: Nash and correlated equilibria: some complexity considerations. Games Econom. Behav. 1(1), 80–93 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-8256(89)90006-7
Hansen, K.A.: The real computational complexity of minmax value and equilibrium refinements in multi-player games. Theory Comput. Syst. 63(7), 1554–1571 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-018-9887-9
Maschler, M., Solan, E., Zamir, S.: Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
Nash, J.: Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 2(54), 286–295 (1951). https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
Schaefer, M., Štefankovič, D.: Fixed points, Nash equilibria, and the existential theory of the reals. Theory Comput. Syst. 60, 172–193 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bilò, V., Hansen, K.A., Mavronicolas, M. (2023). Computational Complexity of Decision Problems About Nash Equilibria in Win-Lose Multi-player Games. In: Deligkas, A., Filos-Ratsikas, A. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43254-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43253-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43254-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)