Abstract
Associative reasoning refers to the human ability to focus on knowledge that is relevant to a particular problem. In this process, the meaning of symbol names plays an important role: when humans focus on relevant knowledge about the symbol ice, similar symbols like snow also come into focus. In this paper, we model this associative reasoning by introducing a selection strategy that extracts relevant parts from large commonsense knowledge sources. This selection strategy is based on word similarities from word embeddings and is therefore able to take the meaning of symbol names into account. We demonstrate the usefulness of this selection strategy with a case study from creativity testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Álvez, J., Lucio, P., Rigau, G.: Adimen-SUMO: reengineering an ontology for first-order reasoning. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 8, 80–116 (2012)
Basile, V., Cabrio, E., Schon, C.: KNEWS: using logical and lexical semantics to extract knowledge from natural language. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI) 2016 Conference (2016)
Blaine, R., Worthen, P.M.C.: Toward an improved measure of remote associational ability. J. Educ. Measure. 8(2), 113–123 (1971)
Furbach, U., Krämer, T., Schon, C.: Names are not just sound and smoke: word embeddings for axiom selection. In: Fontaine, P. (ed.) CADE 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11716, pp. 250–268. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29436-6_15
Hees, J.: Simulating Human Associations with Linked Data. Ph.D. thesis, Kaiserslautern University of Technology, Germany (2018). https://kluedo.ub.rptu.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/5430
Hoder, K., Voronkov, A.: Sine qua non for large theory reasoning. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6803, pp. 299–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22438-6_23
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, London (2011)
Lenat, D.B.: CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun. ACM 38(11), 33–38 (1995)
Liu, Q., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Sutcliffe, G.: Evaluation of axiom selection techniques. In: PAAR+SC\({^2}\)@IJCAR. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2752, pp. 63–75. CEUR-WS.org (2020)
Liu, Q., Xu, Y.: Axiom selection over large theory based on new first-order formula metrics. Appl. Intell. 52(2), 1793–1807 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02469-1
Maslan, N., Roemmele, M., Gordon, A.S.: One hundred challenge problems for logical formalizations of commonsense psychology. In: Twelfth International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, Stanford, CA (2015)
Meng, J., Paulson, L.C.: Lightweight relevance filtering for machine-generated resolution problems. J. Appl. Logic 7(1), 41–57 (2009)
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)
Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Lang. Cogn. Process. 6(1), 1–28 (1991). http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ431389
Olteteanu, A., Schöttner, M., Schuberth, S.: Computationally resurrecting the functional remote associates test using cognitive word associates and principles from a computational solver. Knowl. Based Syst. 168, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.023
Roederer, A., Puzis, Y., Sutcliffe, G.: Divvy: an ATP meta-system based on axiom relevance ordering. In: Schmidt, R.A. (ed.) CADE 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5663, pp. 157–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02959-2_13
de Rooij, S., Beek, W., Bloem, P., van Harmelen, F., Schlobach, S.: Are names meaningful? Quantifying social meaning on the semantic web. In: Groth, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9981, pp. 184–199. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46523-4_12
Schon, C., Siebert, S., Stolzenburg, F.: Using conceptnet to teach common sense to an automated theorem prover. In: ARCADE@CADE. EPTCS, vol. 311, pp. 19–24 (2019)
Speer, R., Chin, J., Havasi, C.: Conceptnet 5.5: an open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In: AAAI, pp. 4444–4451. AAAI Press (2017)
Hasan, O., Tahar, S.: Formalization of continuous probability distributions. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73595-3_2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schon, C. (2023). Associative Reasoning for Commonsense Knowledge. In: Seipel, D., Steen, A. (eds) KI 2023: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14236. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42608-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42608-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42607-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42608-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)