Skip to main content

Digital CSR and Corporate Sustainability Moderated by Perceived Technological Environmental Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cutting-Edge Business Technologies in the Big Data Era (SICB 2023)

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 135))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study investigates the nexus among digital corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and corporate sustainability as well as the moderating impact of perceived technological environmental uncertainty in this context. It provides empirical evidence from the Jordanian market. To achieve the study’s purpose, 170 e-survey questionnaires were emailed to all Jordanian corporations listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. In the research letter, we invited the respondent to be the chief executive officer (CEO). Using a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the results show that corporate sustainability is positively affected by digital CSR practices and that the relationship between digital CSR practices and corporate sustainability is positively moderated by perceived technological environmental uncertainty. Finally, this study has immediate impact for a wide range of managers, decision-makers, consultants, and policymakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lozano, R.: A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 22(1), 32–44 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G.M., Adams, M., Walker, T.R.: Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability 12(3), 760 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jabłoński, A., Jabłoński, M.: Social perspectives in digital business models of railway enterprises. Energies 13(23), 6445 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stawicka, E.: Sustainable development in the digital age of entrepreneurship. Sustainability 13(8), 4429 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewandowska, A., Stopa, M.: The impact of innovative professional qualifications on the sense of employment security: evidence from Poland. Econ. Soc. 13(3), 72–83 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, K.A., Romi, A.M., Sánchez, D., Sanchez, J.M.: The influence of corporate social responsibility on investment efficiency and innovation. J. Bus. Financ. Acc. 46(3–4), 494–537 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Story, J., Neves, P.: When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Bus. Ethics: a Eur. Rev. 24(2), 111–124 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Omoush, K.S.: Drivers of digital corporate social responsibility during unprecedented crises: an institutional perspective. Kybernetes (2022, ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2022-0959

  9. Lim, J.S., Greenwood, C.A.: Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals. Public Relations Rev. 43(4), 768–776 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Irawan, E.P., Sumartias, S., Priyatna, S., Rahmat, A.: A review on digitalization of CSR during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: opportunities and challenges. Soc. Sci. 11(2), 72 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khattak, A., Yousaf, Z.: Digital social responsibility towards corporate social responsibility and strategic performance of hi-tech SMEs: customer engagement as a mediator. Sustainability 14(1), 131 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández, P., Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V.: What drives CSR communication effectiveness on social media? A process-based theoretical framework and research agenda. Int. J. Advert. 41(3), 385–413 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beddewela, E., Fairbrass, J.: Seeking legitimacy through CSR: institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. J. Bus. Ethics 136, 503–522 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Espejo, R., Lepskiy, V.: An agenda for ontological cybernetics and social responsibility. Kybernetes 50(3), 694–710 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sajko, M., Boone, C., Buyl, T.: CEO greed, corporate social responsibility, and organizational resilience to systemic shocks. J. Manag. 47(4), 957–992 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pedersen, E.R.G., Gwozdz, W.: From resistance to opportunity-seeking: strategic responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility in the Nordic fashion industry. J. Bus. Ethics 119, 245–264 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xie, L., Xu, T., Han, T., Xia, B., Chen, Q., Skitmore, M.: Influence of institutional pressure on megaproject social responsibility behavior. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 28(3), 177–195 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, X., Gao-Zeller, X., Rizzuto, T.E., Yang, F.: Institutional pressures on corporate social responsibility strategy in construction corporations: the role of internal motivations. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 26(4), 721–740 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Starik, M., Rands, G.P.: Weaving an integrated web: multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(4), 908–935 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., de Reuver, M.: Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommun. Policy 43(9), 101828 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schultz, M.D., Seele, P.: Conceptualizing data-deliberation: the starry sky beetle, environmental system risk, and Habermasian CSR in the digital age. Bus. Ethics: A Eur. Rev. 29(2), 303–313 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, A., Cyfert, S., Malewska, K., Mierzejewska, K., Szumowski, W.: The relationships among social, environmental, economic CSR practices and digitalization in polish energy companies. Energies 14(22), 7666 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwaninger, M.: Organizing for sustainability: a cybernetic concept for sustainable renewal. Kybernetes 44(6/7), 935–954 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cardinali, P.G., De Giovanni, P.: Responsible digitalization through digital technologies and green practices. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 29(4), 984–995 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. De Giovanni, P.: Smart supply chains with vendor managed inventory, coordination, and environmental performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 292(2), 515–531 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Puriwat, W., Tripopsakul, S.: The impact of digital social responsibility on preference and purchase intentions: the implication for open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Market Complexity 7(1), 24 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Omoush, K.S., Al-Qirem, R.M., Al Hawatmah, Z.M.: The degree of e-business entrepreneurship and long-term sustainability: an institutional perspective. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manage. 16(1), 29–56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0340-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arianpoor, A., Salehi, M.: A framework for business sustainability performance using meta-synthesis. Manag. Env. Qual.: an Int. J. 32(2), 175–192 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abu Afifa, M.M., Saleh, I.: Management accounting systems effectiveness, perceived environmental uncertainty and enterprise risk management: evidence from Jordan. J. Account. Organ. Chang. 17(5), 704–727 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abu Afifa, M.M., Saleh, I.: Management accounting systems effectiveness, perceived environmental uncertainty and companies’ performance: the case of Jordanian companies. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 30(2), 259–288 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Badulescu, A., Badulescu, D., Saveanu, T., Hatos, R.: The relationship between firm size and age, and its social responsibility actions—Focus on a developing country (Romania). Sustainability 10(3), 805 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wickert, C., Scherer, A.G., Spence, L.J.: Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: implications of firm size and organizational cost. J. Manage. Stud. 53(7), 1169–1196 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shrivastava, M., Tamvada, J.P.: Which green matters for whom? Greening and firm performance across age and size distribution of firms. Small Bus. Econ. 52(4), 951–968 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9942-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Laukkanen, S., Sarpola, S., Hallikainen, P.: Enterprise size matters: objectives and constraints of ERP adoption. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 20(3), 319–334 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lassala, C., Orero-Blat, M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S.: The financial performance of listed companies in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34(1), 427–449 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Jr., Ringle, C.M.: “PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet”–retrospective observations and recent advances. J. Market. Theory Practice 31, 261–275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2056488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akter, S., Fosso Wamba, S., Dewan, S.: Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modeling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality. Product. Plann. Control 28(11–12), 1011–1021 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kock, N.: Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collaboration 11(4), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malik Abu Afifa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1. Scale Evaluation

Appendix 1. Scale Evaluation

Variable

Items

Code

Outer loadings

CR

AVE

Digital CSR practices (DCSR)

   

0.949

0.758

To what degree do you believe digital techniques/solutions/platforms help your corporation to:

   

Inform the public about CSR efforts and activities

DCSR1

0.883

  

Interact and work with people of society

DCSR2

0.861

  

Support the activities of the society that promote quality of life and well-being

DCSR3

0.883

  

Contribute to volunteer societal initiatives

DCSR4

0.873

  

Increase understanding of stakeholders’ requirements and expectations

DCSR5

0.839

  

Increase societal awareness and knowledge of hazards and safety precautions during emergencies

DCSR6

0.884

  

Corporate sustainability (CS)

 

To what degree do you believe that adopting and implementing CSR using digital techniques, solutions, and platforms help to:

 

0.880

0.512

Ensure a long-term reputation

CS1

0.750

  

Provide a long-term competitive edge

CS2

0.759

  

Maintain the corporate’s growth

CS3

0.719

  

Build long-term ties with stakeholders and the general public

CS4

0.668

  

Increase client satisfaction

CS5

0.678

  

Increase societal acceptability and legitimacy

CS6

0.768

  

Increase performance

CS7

0.657

  

Perceived technological environmental uncertainty (PTEU)

Our sector’s software updates are extremely predictable

PTEU1

0.788

0.877

0.641

Hardware opportunities in our business are fairly predictable

PTEU2

0.759

  

Technological advances in our sector are fairly predictable

PTEU3

0.823

  

Changes in technology in our sector over the next three years are extremely foreseeable

PTEU4

0.831

  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abu Afifa, M., Saleh, I., Van, H.V., Alkhawaja, A., Bader, A., Al-Hroot, Y. (2023). Digital CSR and Corporate Sustainability Moderated by Perceived Technological Environmental Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence. In: Yaseen, S.G. (eds) Cutting-Edge Business Technologies in the Big Data Era. SICB 2023. Studies in Big Data, vol 135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42463-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics