Skip to main content

Experience by Cohabitation: Living in a Smart Home Initiated by Your Partner

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023 (INTERACT 2023)

Abstract

Setting up a smart home network in a shared household is typically initiated by individuals with a strong interest in technology, who consider the corresponding research, purchases, installation, and maintenance required, a hobby. Other people living in the same household, such as partners, are thus exposed to the technology. We interviewed 12 female users whose partners set up smart home networks in the shared home. From the perspective of the individuals confronted with technology usage, we explored adoption and acceptance processes and how they collaborate as a couple in designing their shared, connected home. To form the interview guideline, we conducted a pre-study in which we analyzed a sample of online forum threads, in which smart home hobbyists discuss challenges and tensions that arise with their partners. Proceeding from the insight that creating a shared smart home is a process highly influenced by the roles users assume in the household, we contribute to understanding the perception of smart home benefits, appreciation, and participation from the angle of users who did not initiate the setup of the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The query that we used for the Brandwatch search can be found here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jHxW8msLg4I7S6ySUoetqjcN1e92pl-V/view?usp=drive_link.

References

  1. Adobe Premiere Pro CC (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandwatch (2022). https://www.brandwatch.com/

  3. MAXQDA Standard, November 2022. https://www.maxqda.de/

  4. Microsoft Teams (2022). https://www.microsoft.com/de-de/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software

  5. Miro (2022). https://miro.com/app/dashboard/

  6. Aagaard, L.K.: When smart technologies enter household practices: the gendered implications of digital housekeeping. Housing Theory Soc. 1–18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2022.2094460, publisher: Routledge _eprint

  7. Aldossari, M.Q., Sidorova, A.: Consumer acceptance of internet of things (IoT): smart home context. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 60(6), 507–517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1543000, publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint

  8. Baudier, P., Ammi, C., Deboeuf-Rouchon, M.: Smart home: highly-educated students’ acceptance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 153, 119355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.043, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518300192

  9. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne (Nov (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brütting, A., Golle, D., Niklas, C., Thiel, C.: Das verbraucherfreundliche Smart Home (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989), place: US Publisher: Management Information Systems Research Center. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

  12. Dean, L., Churchill, B., Ruppanner, L.: The mental load: building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers. Community Work Family (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.2002813. Nov

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrenberg, N., Keinonen, T.: The technology is enemy for me at the moment: how smart home technologies assert control beyond intent. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11. ACM, Yokohama Japan, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445058, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445058

  14. Geeng, C., Roesner, F.: Who’s in control?: Interactions in multi-user smart homes. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, Glasgow Scotland UK, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300498, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300498

  15. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206

  16. Gross, C., Siepermann, M., Lackes, R.: The acceptance of smart home technology. In: Buchmann, R.A., Polini, A., Johansson, B., Karagiannis, D. (eds.) BIR 2020. LNBIP, vol. 398, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hargreaves, T., Wilson, C.: Smart Homes and Their Users. Human-Computer Interaction Series, Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7

  18. Harmer, E., Lumsden, K.: Online Othering: An Introduction, pp. 1–33, April 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9

  19. Hayes, J.L., Britt, B.C., Evans, W., Rush, S.W., Towery, N.A., Adamson, A.C.: Can social media listening platforms’ artificial intelligence be trusted? Examining the accuracy of Crimson Hexagon’s (Now Brandwatch Consumer Research’s) AI-driven analyses. J. Advertising 50(1), 81–91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1809576, publisher: Routledge _eprint

  20. Jang, W., Chhabra, A., Prasad, A.: Enabling multi-user controls in smart home devices. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Internet of Things Security and Privacy. IoTS &P ’17, pp. 49–54. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, November 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139937.3139941

  21. Koshy, V., Park, J.S.S., Cheng, T.C., Karahalios, K.: “We just use what they give us”: understanding passenger user perspectives in smart homes. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’21, pp. 1–14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445598

  22. Laschke, M., et al.: Otherware needs Otherness: understanding and designing artificial counterparts. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, pp. 1–4, No. 131. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420079

  23. Layton, N., Steel, E.: The convergence and mainstreaming of integrated home technologies for people with disability. Societies 9(4), 69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc9040069, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/9/4/69, number: 4 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

  24. Mennicken, S., Huang, E.M.: Hacking the natural habitat: an in-the-wild study of smart homes, their development, and the people who live in them. In: Kay, J., Lukowicz, P., Tokuda, H., Olivier, P., Krüger, A. (eds.) Pervasive 2012. LNCS, vol. 7319, pp. 143–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31205-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer, G.: Smart Home Hacks: Tips & Tools for Automating Your House. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poole, E.S., Chetty, M., Grinter, R.E., Edwards, W.K.: More than meets the eye: transforming the user experience of home network management. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’08, pp. 455–464. ACM Press, Cape Town, South Africa (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394494, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1394445.1394494

  27. Rode, J.A., Poole, E.S.: Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender and IT. GenderIT ’18, pp. 79–90. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196845

  28. Sadowski, J., Strengers, Y., Kennedy, J.: More work for big mother: revaluing care and control in smart homes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, p. 0308518X211022366 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211022366, publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

  29. Santo, B.R.: Acronym Addiction. IEEE Spectrum 43(10), 28–33 (2006). http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/ucacdxq/others/acronym.pdf

  30. Schulz, A.S., Hornecker, E.: Can you please cover both the “smart” and the “home”? Exploring expectations on smart homes considering changing needs. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. MUM ’22, pp. 128–137. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3568444.3568447

  31. Strengers, Y., Gram-hanssen, K., Dahlgren, K., Aagaard, L.K.: Energy, emerging technologies and gender in homes. Buildings Cities 3(1), 842–853 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.273, http://journal-buildingscities.org/articles/10.5334/bc.273/

  32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540, https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540, publisher: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota

  33. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41410412, publisher: Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota

  34. Volmar, A.: Experiencing High Fidelity, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190466961.013.19, https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34658/chapter/295315910

  35. Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., Hauxwell-Baldwin, R.: Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Person. Ubiquitous Comput, 19(2), 463–476 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0

  36. Zavialova, S.: Smart Home - Market Data & Forecast. Technical report, statista, December 2022. https://www.statista.com/outlook/dmo/smart-home/europe

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Sabrina Schulz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schulz, A.S., Müller, J., Beruscha, F. (2023). Experience by Cohabitation: Living in a Smart Home Initiated by Your Partner. In: Abdelnour Nocera, J., Kristín Lárusdóttir, M., Petrie, H., Piccinno, A., Winckler, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023. INTERACT 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42286-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42285-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42286-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics