Skip to main content

How to Do Criminological Research on, for, and with Children and Young People

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fieldwork Experiences in Criminology and Security Studies

Abstract

Research with children and young people is essential for understanding antisocial behavior and victimization. Likewise, learning about juvenile offenders’ needs and experiences has been a central issue in juvenile justice research. Therefore, criminology needs research with young people. In this chapter, we discuss the ethical and emotional issues in researching with and for children, based on our own experience in the field. We begin by emphasizing that the entire design of an investigation, in each of its phases, must be respectful and careful of children’s well-being, taking a child-centered approach. We pay special attention to how to encourage the voice of young people to be heard and attended to throughout the research process. Secondly, we reflect on how researchers can respond to ethical requirements, such as free participation and anonymity; also, we discuss about emotional work that researchers must carry out. Finally, we collect some lessons learned and good practices to carry out rigorous and respectful research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, the terms children, minors, adolescents, and young people shall be used interchangeably to refer to participants under the age of 18. When reference is made to research on offenders and according to the age–delinquency curve we refer to children over 12 years of age, who are in the adolescent stage. When reference is made to victims, they may be younger, so we have opted to use the terms children and minors.

  2. 2.

    Prisoners, students, and soldiers are considered captive populations. For different reasons their individual autonomy is limited, and therefore, their capacity for voluntary consent may be compromised (Bonham & Moreno, 2008)

  3. 3.

    https://childethics.com/

  4. 4.

    The International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD) is an international collaborative study on delinquency, victimization, and substance use. Three sweeps were conducted in 1991–1992 (ISRD1), 2006–2008 (ISRD2), and 2012–2019 (ISRD3). More information is available at https://isrdstudy.org

  5. 5.

    Let’s be clear is a collection of accessible documents developed by our research group and directed at juveniles suspected of engaging in criminal behaviors who find themselves involved in judicial proceedings. The purpose is to help familiarise young offenders with the different procedural steps they will be exposed to and their rights at each stage. Further information in this link https://www.uclm.es/grupos/crimijov/transferencia/hablemos-claro?sc_lang=en

  6. 6.

    To see good practices in health context http://iconsent.pilotvalidation.eu/en/teenagers-study/

References

  • Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndorfer, A., Malloy, L. C., & Cauffman, E. (2015). Interrogations, confessions, and adolescent offenders’ perceptions of the legal system. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, R., & Russell, L. (2018). Participatory visual methods: exploring young people’s identities hopes and feelings. Ethnography and Education 14(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2018.1441041

  • Barley, R., & Russell, L. (2019). Participatory visual methods: Exploring young people’s identities, hopes and feelings. Ethnography and Education, 14(2), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barriage, S. (2021). Examining young children's information practices and experiences: A child-centered methodological approach. Library and Information Science Research, 43(3), 101106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beazley, H., Bessell, S., Ennew, J., & Waterson, R. (2009). The right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world. Children’s Geographies, 7(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280903234428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernuz, M. J. (2019). El derecho de la infancia a ser investigada correctamente. Papers Revista de Sociología, 104(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, V., & Moreno, J. (2008). In E. J. Emanuel, C. C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller, & D. D. Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 461–474). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., & Youngs, D. (2015). The LAAF procedure for exploring offenders' narratives. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 54(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, E., Otto, M., Belloni, M., Lems, A., & Wernesjö, U. (2019). Methodological innovations, reflections and dilemmas: The hidden sides of research with migrant young people classified as unaccompanied minors. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(2), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, P. (2007). Metodología y técnicas de investigación social. Mc Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, A. M. B., Brendel, N., Degbelo, A., & Kray, C. (2018). Participatory design and participatory research: An HCI case study with young forced migrants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennew, J., & Plateau, D. P. (2004). How to research the physical and emotional punishment of children. International Save the Children Alliance Southeast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann, D. (2013). The impact of questionnaire design on prevalence and incidence rates of self-reported delinquency: Results of an experiment modifying the ISRD-2 questionnaire. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(1), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Alguacil, M., & López-Carril, S. (2021). Incorporating TikTok in higher education: Pedagogical perspectives from a corporal expression sport sciences course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 28, 100302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Molina, E., Bermejo, M. A., & Baz, O. (2018). Percepciones de los jóvenes infractores sobre la justicia de menores. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 16, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v16i0.173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Molina, E., & Bartolomé, R. (2022). Ciudadanos y sistema penal: explorando la accesibilidad de la justicia penal en España. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Molina, E., Bermejo, M., & Baz, O. (2021). Observing juvenile courtrooms: Testing the implementation of guidelines on child-friendly justice in Spain. Youth Justice, 21(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225420918027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Molina, E., & Montero, A. (2022). An assessment of how rights are read and exercised at a police station. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28, 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-021-09482-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Molina, E., Vicente, L., & Tarancón, P. (2017). Derechos procesales de los menores extranjeros: un estudio de su aplicación práctica en la justicia penal. InDret, 17(2), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez Molina, E., González Oliver, M., & Bartolome, R. (2022). Too few too count: the use of life history to understand the experience of young female offenders in the juvenile justice system. 22rd Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology. Málaga, 23 Septiembre de 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohring, S. (2020). The risks and rewards of researching victims of crime. Methodological Innovations, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120926339

  • Gallagher, M. (2009). Ethics. In E. K. Tisdall, J. Davis, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Researching with children and young people: Research design, method and analysis (pp. 11–28). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García-Quiroga, M., & Agoglia, I. S. (2020). Too vulnerable to participate? Challenges for meaningful participation in research with children in alternative care and adoption. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958965

  • Glegg, S. M. (2019). Facilitating interviews in qualitative research with visual tools: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 29(2), 301–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A., Powell, M. A., & Taylor, N. (2015). Ethical research involving children: Encouraging reflexive engagement in research with children and young people. Children & Society, 29(5), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12089

  • Grégoire, J., & Mathys, C. (2023) Motivations to refuse or participate in self-reported delinquency surveys: A qualitative study among Belgian juveniles in custody. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 29(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-021-09494-3

  • James, A. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2008). ‘It’s well good sitting in the store cupboard just talking about what we do’: Considering the spaces/places of research within children's geographies. Children’s Geographies, 6(3), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802184047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V., Hart, R., & Colwell, J. (2014). Steps for engaging young children in research: the toolkit. Available at: https://bernardvanleer.org/publications-reports/steps-engaging-young-children-research-volume-1-guide/. Accessed 22 Apr 2022.

  • Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making every second count”: Utilizing TikTok and systems thinking to facilitate scientific public engagement and contextualization of chemistry at home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c0051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, E., & Tisdall, M. (2009). Dissemination-or engagement? In E. K. Tisdall, J. Davis, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Researching with children and young people: Research design, method and analysis (pp. 194–220). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilkelly, U. (2010) Listening to Children about Justice: Report of the Council of Europe’s Consultation with Children on Child-Friendly Justice. Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, P. (2020). ‘It’s never okay to say no to teachers’: Children’s research consent and dissent in conforming schools contexts. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 811–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, A., Han, B. H., & Palamar, J. J. (2021). When national drug surveys “take too long”: An examination of who is at risk for survey fatigue. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 225, 108769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lems, A. (2020). Being inside out: The slippery slope between inclusion and exclusion in a Swiss educational project for unaccompanied refugee youth. Journal for Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(2), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1584702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, L., McEvoy, L., & Byrne, B. (2011). Working with young children as co-researchers: An approach informed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 714–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, S., & Elliott, I. (2019). The emotional risks of turning stories into data: An exploration of the experiences of qualitative researchers working on sensitive topics. Societies, 9(3), 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montreuil, M., Bogossian, A., Laberge-Perrault, E., & Racine, E. (2021). A review of approaches, strategies and ethical considerations in participatory research with children. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987962

  • Moran, R. J., & Asquith, N. L. (2020). Understanding the vicarious trauma and emotional labour of criminological research. Methodological Innovations, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120926085

  • Morrison, Z. J., Gregory, D., & Thibodeau, S. (2012). “Thanks for using me”: An exploration of exit strategy in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V., Boddy, J., & Lamb, R. (2014). The ethics of secondary data analysis: Learning from the experience of sharing qualitative data from young people and their families in an international study of childhood poverty. National Centre for Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øverlien, C., & Holt, S. (2021). Qualitative interviews with children and adolescents who have experienced domestic violence and abuse. In J. Devaney, C. Bradbury-Jones, R. Macy, C. Øverlien, & S. Holt (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of domestic violence and abuse (pp. 657–670). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, I. S., & Van Buggenhout, M. (2020). Giving voice to migrant children during reception and asylum procedures. Illustrations on the implementation of Art. 12 CRC in Greece and Belgium. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 18, 1. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v18i2.347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M., Taylor, N., Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., & Anderson, D. (2013). Ethical research involving children. Innocenti Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rap, S. E. (2013). The participation of juvenile defendants in the youth court. A comparative study of juvenile justice procedures in Europe. Pallas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 538–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulet, T. J., Gill, M. J., Stenger, S., & Gill, D. J. (2017). Reconsidering the value of covert research: The role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(3), 487–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S. (2011). The limits of children’s voices: From authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood, 18(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tham, J., Gómez, A. G., & Garasic, M. D. (2022). Cross-cultural and religious critiques of informed consent. Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, N. A., Jacoby, S. F., Williams, T., Guerra, T., Thomas, N. A., & Richmond, T. S. (2013). Digital animation as a method to disseminate research findings to the community using a community-based participatory approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 30–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vindrola-Padros, C., Martins, A., Coyne, I., Bryan, G., & Gibson, F. (2016). From informed consent to dissemination: Using participatory visual methods with young people with long-term conditions at different stages of research. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 636–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wernesjö, U. (2014). Conditional belonging: Listening to unaccompanied young refugees’ voices. Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

In this paper results from a research that has received funding from the National Government of Spain are provided (National R&D Plan: PID2020-118151RB-I00).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Fernández-Molina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández-Molina, E., Bartolomé-Gutiérrez, R. (2023). How to Do Criminological Research on, for, and with Children and Young People. In: Díaz-Fernández, A.M., Del-Real, C., Molnar, L. (eds) Fieldwork Experiences in Criminology and Security Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics