Abstract
Participatory photography projects with marginalized groups have become commonplace. Underpinned by celebratory narratives that cast photography as an inherently empowering activity, these projects promise to give voice and enable change. However critical thinkers raise concerns around tokenism and the over-simplification of the participatory photography narrative. They point to a hollowing of the critical and radical potential of contemporary participatory and community-engaged photography. The challenge for practitioners is how to re-imagine the promise of participatory photography to account for the tension and negotiation it involves. Drawing on photography by young people living in the UK as refugees, this chapter offers the conceptual metaphor of a photography of becoming to reconceptualise the promise of participatory photography through a pluralist imagination. A photography of becoming accounts for the fluid and contrary forms of photography that emerge from participatory projects. It frames participatory photography’s potential as lying in its capacity to enable and accommodate plural ways of seeing and to nurture a critical, dialogical engagement with difference. A photography of becoming highlights the emergent, collaborative and fragile character of participatory photography while reaffirming its contribution to supporting emerging voices and claims, creating spaces for agency and resistance and making visible unheard and unrecognized stories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this writing, ‘participatory photography’ is used as an umbrella term to refer to a range of community-engaged photographic practices in which participants or community members are supported by facilitators to create and produce their own photographic work. Participatory photography has been harnessed by a range of practitioners and researchers in diverse contexts with varying agendas. As a result, many different applications and forms of participatory photography now exist in different fields, each with their own terminology, lineage, protocols and criteria. One of the most popular of these is photovoice, a participatory action research methodology first developed by Caroline Wang (1997). Whilst participatory photography refers to a spectrum of practices with varying interpretations as to what constitutes ‘photography’ and ‘participation’, it can be distinguished from other forms of collaborative and socially engaged photography in which artists or professional image producers collaborate with community members to co-produce photographic work and retain co-authorship of the work produced. Authorship in participatory photography projects can be individual, collaborative and collective, but it lies with the participants or community members and is not shared with the artist or practitioner facilitator.
- 2.
- 3.
PhotoVoice is a UK-based photographic charity which runs participatory photography projects in the UK and internationally. Co-founded by myself and Anna Blackman in 1999, I worked as a co-director of PhotoVoice for its first 11 years until 2010. https://photovoice.org/.
- 4.
- 5.
The projects ran from 2002 onwards and comprised a number of different initiatives including Transparency (2002–03), Moving Lives (2004–06) and New Londoners (2007–09).
- 6.
See Chalak Abdulrahman’s visceral pairings of images in his project Maybe in PhotoVoice (2008) New Londoners: Reflections on Home. Trolley Books.
- 7.
See Shamin Nakalembe’s project, Side by Side, in PhotoVoice (2008) New Londoners: Reflections on Home. Trolley Books.
References
Azoulay, Ariella. 2008. The Civil Contract of Photography. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
———. 2012. Civil Imagination: A Political Ontology of Photography. New York: Verso.
Barthes, Roland. 1982. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. London: Vintage Classics.
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Revised edition. Taylor & Francis.
Connolly, William. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralisation. University of Minnesota Press.
———. 2005. Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Couldry, Nick. 2010. Why Voice Matters. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Dreher, Tanja. 2012. A Partial Promise of Voice: Digital Stroytelling and the Limit of Listening. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy 142: 157–166.
Fairey, Tiffany. 2015. ‘Whose Pictures Are These? Re-Framing the Promise of Participatory Photography’. PhD thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London.
———. 2018. Whose Photo? Whose Voice? Who Listens? “Giving”, Silencing and Listening to Voice in Participatory Visual Projects. Visual Studies 33 (2): 111–126.
———. 2019. Building a History of Citizen Photography: The TAFOS Story. Photography and Culture 13 (1): 57–82.
Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 2 Rev Ed. London: Penguin.
Gubrium, Aline, and Krista Harper. 2013. Participatory Visual and Digital Methods. Routledge.
Hall, Stuart. 1990. Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, ed. Jonathan Rutherfold, 222–237. Lawrence & Wishart.
Harrison, Judy, ed. 2014. Our Faces, Our Spaces: Photography, Community and Representation. London: Cornerhouse Publications.
hooks, bell. 1989. Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press.
Kester, Grant. 1995. Aesthetic Evangelists: Conversion and Empowerment in Contemporary Community Art. Afterimage 22: 5–11.
Law, John, and John Urry. 2005. Enacting the Social. Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410.
Liebenberg, Linda. 2018. Thinking Critically About Photovoice: Achieving Empowerment and Social Change. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17: 1–9.
Lindholm, Charles. 2008. Culture and Authenticity. Blackwell.
Luttrell, Wendy, and Richard Chalfen. 2010. Lifting up Voices of Participatory Visual Research. Visual Studies 25 (3): 197–200.
Lykes, M. Brinton. 2010. Silence(Ing), Voice(s) and Gross Violations of Human Rights: Constituting and Performing Subjectivities through PhotoPAR. Visual Studies 25 (3): 238–254.
Mitchell, W.J.T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. University of Chicago Press.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2009. The Democratic Paradox. Verso Books.
Orton, Liz. 2009. Photography and Integration: A Case study of a PhotoVoice Project. In Participatory Arts with Young Refugees, 2–8. Oval House Theatre.
Palmer, Daniel. 2017. Photography and Collaboration. London: Bloomsbury.
PhotoVoice. 2006. Transparency. Young Refugees Take on London.
———. 2008. New Londoners: Reflections on Home. Illustrated edition. London: Trolley Books.
Salih, Sara. 2002. Judith Butler (Routledge Critical Thinkers). Routledge.
Shaw, Jacqueline. 2012. Beyond Empowerment Inspiration: Interrogating the Gap between the Ideals and Practice Reality of Participatory Video. In Handbook of Participatory Video, ed. E.J. Milne, C. Mitchell, and N. de Lange, 225–241. Altamira Press.
Stacey, Noni. 2020. Photography of Protest and Community. The Radical Collectives of the 1970s. Lund Humphries.
Wang, Caroline, and Mary Ann Burris. 1997. Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behaviour 24 (3): 369–387.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fairey, T. (2024). A Photography of Becoming: Re-imaging the Promise of Participatory Photography. In: Bertrand, M., Chambefort-Kay, K. (eds) Contemporary Photography as Collaboration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41444-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41444-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41443-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41444-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)