Skip to main content

Exploring Digital Innovation Paths in Healthcare: The Case of a Large Swedish Healthcare Organization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2023)

Abstract

Digital innovation has been advocated as bringing new opportunities to organizations. At the same time, here is still a gap of empirical research on the paths, i.e., choices in directions manifested over time, of digital innovation in public sector healthcare. In this study, we aim to fill this gap through analyzing a complete set of three years of centrally funded innovation projects in a large incumbent healthcare organization. Using a previously proposed framework combining the Resource Based View and Organizational Ambidexterity into a positioning of digital innovation opportunity, we investigate the paths of digital innovation. The findings show that the predominant path of digital innovation lies in exploitative innovation through utilizing internal and shared resources. In contrast with the literature the use of complementary assets in the form of external resources i.e., engaging customers and other external parties in value creation, is only found in one of the projects. We describe this as a case of path dependency, where the organization avoids tapping into some of the core opportunities in digital innovation. This is discussed in relation to the digital innovation literature and the future paths of digital innovation in public sector healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., Marante, C.A.: A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J Manag. Stud. 58, 1159–1197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 118–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chanias, S., Myers, M.D., Hess, T.: Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: the case of a financial services provider. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 17–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norling, K., Lindroth, T., Magnusson, J., Torell, J.: Digital decoupling: a population study of digital transformation strategies in Swedish municipalities. In: Dg O 2022 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 356–363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543639

  5. Lindroth, T., Magnusson, J., Norling, K., Torell, J.: Balancing the digital portfolio: empirical evidence of an ambidextrous bias in digital government. In: Dg O 2022 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 307–314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543641

  6. Drechsler, K., Wagner, H.T., Gregory, R., et al.: At the crossroad between digital innovation and digital transformation.pdf. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.044XX

  7. Hund, A., Wagner, H.-T., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T.: Digital innovation: review and novel perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 30, 101695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inform. Syst. Res. 21, 724–735 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., University, G.S., Lindgren, R.: Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q. 41, 239–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.12

  10. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Theorizing the digital object1. MIS Q. 43, 1279–1302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2019/13136

  11. Oberländer, A.M., Röglinger, M., Rosemann, M.: Digital opportunities for incumbents – a resource-centric perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 30, 101670 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., Päivärinta, T.: Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: enacting ambidextrous IT Governance in the public sector. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 29, 329–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1740617

  13. Xue, L.: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Q. 36, 509–528 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41703465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mithas, S., Rust, R.T.: How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance. MIS Q. 40, 223–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2016/40.1.10

  15. Sheikh, A., et al.: Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Lancet Digit. Heal. 3, e383–e396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., Keil, M.: A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Inf. Syst. J. 31, 198–225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bygstad, B.: Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. J. Inf. Technol. 32, 180–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jovanovic, K., et al.: Digital innovation hubs in health-care robotics fighting COVID-19. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 28, 40–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2020.3044965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozalp, H., Ozcan, P., Dinckol, D., Zachariadis, M., Gawer, A.: “Digital Colonization” of highly regulated industries: an analysis of big tech platforms’ entry into health care and education. Calif. Manag. Rev. 64, 78–107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221094307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eom, S.-J., Lee, J.: Digital government transformation in turbulent times: responses, challenges, and future direction. Gov. Inform. Q. 39, 101690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., Greenwood, R.: Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Inf. Org. 28, 52–61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y.,Boland Jr., R.J.: Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 47–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093

  23. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., Dæhlen, M.: From dual digitalization to digital learning space: exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Comput. Educ. 182, 104463 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Stud. Organ. (2009). https://doi.org/10.3280/so2008-002006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S.: How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. Calif. Manag. Rev. 58, 36–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., Cardinal, L.B.: Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: a configurational perspective on ambidexterity. J. Manag. Stud. 55, 739–769 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, B., Wan, Z., Levinthal, D.A.: Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strat. Manag. J. 35, 1257–1278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Temiz, S.: Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only hackathon case study from Sweden. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 7, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Bracken, C.C.: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28, 587–604 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Priyono, A., Moin, A., Putri, V.N.A.O.: Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 6, 104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104

  31. Magnusson, J., Elliot, V., Hagberg, J.: Digital transformation: why companies resist what they need for sustained performance. J. Bus. Strat. 43, 316–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-02-2021-0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Warner, K.S.R., Wäger, M.: Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plann. 52, 326–349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Burau, V., Nissen, N., Terkildsen, M.D., Væggemose, U.: Personalised medicine and the state: a political discourse analysis. Heal. Polic. 125, 122–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Casino, F., Dasaklis, T.K., Patsakis, C.: A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telemat. Inform. 36, 55–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dillard-Wright, J.: A radical imagination for nursing: generative insurrection, creative resistance. Nurs. Philos. 23, e12371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83, 340–363 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., Chatzoglou, P.: Resistance to change: an empirical investigation of its antecedents. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 31, 426–450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-05-2017-0196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Detert, J.R., Pollock, T.G.: Values, interests, and the capacity to act. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 44, 186–214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308314901

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Magnusson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Magnusson, J., Gajic, A., Isik, L., Nilsson, C. (2023). Exploring Digital Innovation Paths in Healthcare: The Case of a Large Swedish Healthcare Organization. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics