Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological Effects of Basic Income

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income

Part of the book series: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee ((BIG))

  • 398 Accesses

Abstract

Howard, Pinto and Schachtschneider consider ecological arguments for a Basic Income. Environmental limits mean that economic growth might no longer be possible, and some argue that a Basic Income could afford economic security without continued economic growth. A Basic Income could facilitate work sharing, less energy-intensive work, reduced demand for wasteful positional goods, and experiments in living in the autonomous sector. Green growth strategies, including a carbon fee and dividend, are compared with degrowth strategies that call for an absolute decrease in consumption while including a Basic Income to avoid adverse impact on workers and the poor. The resulting redistribution, however, could increase carbon emissions. This means that Basic Income might require complementary policies, such as work time reduction, in order to reach ecological goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, S. (2015). Basic and maximum income. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 146–168). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. O. (2010). Basic Income from an ecological perspective. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1180.

  • Ariès, P. (2007). Le mésusage: Essai sur l'hypercapitalisme. Parangon-Vs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnsperger, C. (2010). Revenu d’existence et promotion de la sociodiversité. [Subsistence income and the promotion of socio-diversity]. Mouvements, 64(4), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asafu-Adjaye, J. et al. (2015). An ecomodernist manifesto. http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto-english/.

  • Barnes, P. (2014). With liberty and dividends for all. Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, B. R. (2004). A Swedish-style welfare state or basic income: Which should have priority? Politics and Society, 32(1), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, S. (2010). Introduction: Basic Income, sustainability and post-productivism. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1178.

  • Birnbaum, S., & De Wispelaere, J. (2016). Basic Income in the capitalist economy: The mirage of ‘exit’ from employment. Basic Income Studies, 11(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnenberger, K. (2020). Money, vouchers, public infrastructures? A framework for sustainable welfare benefits. Sustainability, 12, 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, P. (2010). Basic Income and sustainable consumption strategies. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1179.

  • Boyce, J. K. (2016). The challenge of forging sustainable climate policy. Scholars’ strategy network forum on building democratic support for equitable carbon pricing. https://scholars.org/page/challenge-forging-sustainable-climate-policy.

  • Boyce, J. K. (2019). The case for carbon dividends. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, J. K., & Barnes, P. (2016). How to pay for universal income. http://evonomics.com/how-to-pay-for-universal-basic-income/.

  • Boyce, J. K., Ash, M., & Ranalli, B. (2023). Environmental justice and carbon pricing: Can they be reconciled? Global Challenges. Wiley-VCH GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200204.

  • Boyce, J. K., & Riddle, M. E. (2010). CLEAR economics: State level impacts of the carbon limits and energy for America’s Renewal Act on Family Incomes and Jobs. Political Economy Research Institute. https://ideas.repec.org/p/uma/perips/clear_boyce_revised_july2011.html.

  • Budolfson, M., et al. (2021). Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being. Nature Climate Change, 11(12), 1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01217-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, G. (2010). Mobility, inclusion and the green case for Basic Income. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1181

  • Carbon Tax Center. (n.d.). Dividends. https://www.carbontax.org/dividends/.

  • Casassas, D., & De Wispelaere, J. (2012). The Alaska model: A republican perspective. In K. Widerquist & M. W. Howard (Eds.), Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend: Examining its suitability as a model (pp. 169–188). Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2022). World inequality report. https://wir2022.wid.world/.

  • Christensen, E. (2008). The heretical political discourse: A discourse analysis of the Danish debate on Basic Income. Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citizens’ Climate Lobby. (n.d.). Why put a price on carbon? https://citizensclimatelobby.org/price-on-carbon/.

  • Citizens’ Climate Lobby/Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI). The environmental, economic and health impact of carbon fee and dividend. https://citizensclimatelobby.org/remi-report/.

  • Climate Leadership Council. (n.d.). The four pillars of our carbon dividends plan. https://www.clcouncil.org/our-plan/.

  • Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wispelaere, J. (n.d.). Conversation with an author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, P. (2016). A citizens’ approach to carbon equity: Voting on rebates and collective investments. Scholars’ Strategy Network Forum on Building Democratic Support for Equitable Carbon Pricing. https://scholars.org/page/citizens%e2%80%99-approach-carbon-equity-voting-rebates-and-collective-investments.

  • Federal Office for the Environment. (2018). Fact sheet on the impact assessment and evaluation of the CO2 levy on thermal fuels. https://www.bafu.admin.ch/dam/bafu/en/dokumente/klima/fachinfo-daten/wirkungsabschaetzungco2-abgabefaktenblatt.pdf.download.pdf/impact_assessmentoftheco2levyfactsheet.pdf.

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (1998). The implications of ecological thought for social welfare. Critical Social Policy, 18(54), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (1999). Freedom and security: An introduction to the Basic Income debate. Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Streams, grants and pools: Stakeholding, asset-based welfare and convertibility. Basic Income Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1062.

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (2010). Basic Income, post-productivism and liberalism. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1177.

  • Flomenhaft, G. (2012). Applying the Alaska model in a resource-poor state: The example of Vermont. In K. Widerquist & M. W. Howard (Eds.), Exporting the Alaska Model: Adapting the Permanent Fund Dividend for reform around the world (pp. 85–107). Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., Dittrich, M., Lieber, M., & Lutter, S. (2014). Global patterns of material flows and their socio-economic and environmental implications: A MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009. Resources, 3(1), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. E. (2001). Work and welfare: Towards a post-productivist welfare regime. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1985). Paths to paradise. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1987). Farewell to the working class. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1999). Reclaiming work: Beyond the wage-based society. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (2002). Pour un revenu inconditionnel suffisant. Transversales/Sciences-Culture, 3. http://1libertaire.free.fr/AGorz32.html.

  • Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., … Creutzig, F. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a.

  • Halstead, T. (2017). Unlocking the climate puzzle. Climate Leadership Council. https://www.clcouncil.org/media/Unlocking_The_Climate_Puzzle.pdf.

  • Heath, J., & Panitch, V. (2010). Why cash violates neutrality. Basic Income Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1147.

  • Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A. (2017). How to turn an ocean liner: A proposal for voluntary degrowth by redesigning money for sustainability, justice, and resilience. Journal of Political Ecology. The University of Arizona Libraries (USA). https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20900.

  • Howard, M. W. (2012). A cap on carbon and a Basic Income: A defensible combination in the U.S.? In K. Widerquist and M.W. Howard (Ed.), Exporting the Alaska model: Adapting the Permanent Fund Dividend (pp. 147–162). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. W. (2016). Building support for US climate reforms with universal benefits. Scholars’ Strategy Network Forum on Building Democratic Support for Equitable Carbon Pricing. https://scholars.org/page/building-support-us-climate-reforms-universal-benefits.

  • Howard, M. W. (2017, July 5). A carbon dividend as a step toward a Basic Income in the United States: Prospects and problems. IPR Blog. Bath: Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath. http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/iprblog/2017/07/05/a-carbon-dividend-as-a-step-toward-a-basic-income-in-the-united-states-prospects-and-problems/.

  • Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K., & Patwardhan, A. (2017a). Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nature Communications, 8(1), 912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K., Muñoz Castillo, R., Sun, L., & Xue, J. (2017b). Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2(6), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. A. (1973). The guaranteed income as an environmental measure. In H. E. Daly (Ed.), Toward a steady-state economy (pp. 175–189). W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. A., & Arnsperger, C. (2011). The guaranteed income as an equal opportunity tool in the transition toward sustainability. In A. Gosseries & Y. Vanderborght (Eds.), Arguing about justice (pp. 61–70). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, G., Kalush, M., Flynn, H. O., Rossiter, J., & Ashford, N. (2013). ‘Friday off’: Reducing working hours in Europe. Sustainability, 5(4), 1545–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K., Rosa, E. A., & Schor, J. B. (2013). Reducing growth to achieve environmental sustainability: The role of work hours. In J. Wicks-Lim & R. Pollin (Eds.), Capitalism on trial—Explorations in the tradition of Thomas E. Weisskopf (pp. 187–204). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komanoff, C. (2008). British Columbia introduces revenue-neutral carbon tax. Carbon Tax Center. https://www.carbontax.org/blog/2008/02/20/british-columbia-introduces-revenue-neutral-carbon-tax/.

  • Liegey, V., Madelaine, S., Ondet, C., & Veillot, A.-I. (2013). Un projet de décroissance: Manifeste pour une dotation inconditionnelle d’autonomie. Les Éditions Utopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludewig, D. (2017). Wie eine ökologische Finanzreform die Postwachstumsökonomie fördern kann. In F. Adler & U. Schachtschneider (Eds.), Postwachstumspolitiken: Wege zur wachstumsunabhängigen Gesellschaft (pp. 225–238). Oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorek, S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2015). Sustainable consumption as a systemic challenge: Inter-and transdisciplinary research and research questions. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 19–32). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeill, T., & Vibert, A. (2019). Universal Basic Income and the natural environment theory and policy. Basic Income Studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2018-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, A. (2017). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmaeus, M., Alfredsson, E., & Birnbaum, S. (2020). Basic Income and social sustainability in post-growth economies. Basic Income Studies, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2019-0029.

  • Merrill, R., Bizarro, S., Marcelo, G., & Pinto, J. (2019). Rendimento Básico Incondicional: Uma defesa da liberdade. Edições 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvale, J. P. (2018). Making the green case for basic income: UBI, the environment and social justice. Presentation at the North American Basic Income Guarantee Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (2016). In our hands: A plan to replace the welfare state. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylondo, B. (2010). Un revenu pour tous: Précis d’utopie réaliste. Les Éditions Utopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylondo, B. (2012). Pour un revenu sans condition: Garantir l'accès aux biens et services essentiels. Les Éditions Utopia.

    Google Scholar 

  • NørgÃ¥rd, J., & Xue, J. (2016). Between green growth and degrowth: Decoupling, rebound effects and the politics for long-term sustainability. In T. Santarius, H. J. Walnum, & C. Aall (Eds.), Rethinking climate and energy policies: New perspectives on the rebound phenomenon (pp. 267–284). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2018). How not to argue against growth: Happiness, austerity and inequality. In H. Rosa & C. Henning (Eds.), The good life beyond growth (pp. 141–152). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech., N. (2016). Liberation from excess: The road to a post-growth economy. oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (2004). Democratizing citizenship: Some advantages of a Basic Income. Politics & Society, 32(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. (2020). Environmentalism, ecologism, and Basic Income. Basic Income Studies, 15(1), 20190026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollin, R., & Chasman, D. (2015). Greening the global economy. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollin, R. (2015, October 27). Think we can’t stabilize the climate while fostering growth? Think again. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/think-we-cant-stabilize-the-climate-while-fostering-growth-think-again/.

  • Portes, J., Reed, H., & Percy, A. (2017). Social prosperity for the future: A proposal for Universal Basic Services. Social Prosperity Network Report. London: Institute for Global Prosperity, University College London. https://ubshub.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/social-prosperity-network-ubs.pdf.

  • Sager, L. (2017). Income inequality and carbon consumption: Evidence from environmental Engel curves. Working Paper 385. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/income-inequality-and-carbon-consumption-evidence-from-environmental-engel-curves/.

  • Schachtschneider, U. (2012). Ecological Basic Income: An entry is possible. A paper presented at the BIEN Congress in Munich in 2012. http://www.bien2012.de/sites/default/files/paper_212_en.pdf.

  • Schachtschneider, U. (2014). Ecological Basic Income: An acceleration brake. A paper presented to the Fourth Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity. http://www.ulrich-schachtschneider.de/resources/Ulrich+Schachtschneider+-+Ecological+Basic+Income+-+An+Acceleration+B$E2$80$A6.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A. (2022). The future is degrowth. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. B. (2005). Sustainable consumption and work time reduction. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (2017). Climate dreaming: Negative emissions, risk transfer, and irreversibility. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 8(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, E., & Skidelsky, R. (2012). How much is enough? Money and the good life. Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (2005). Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? American Economic Review, 95(2), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2017). Basic Income: And how we can make it happen. Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2023). The blue commons: Rescuing the economy of the sea. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. & Tilford, D. (2000). Why consumption matters. In J. B. Schor and D. Holt (Ed.), The Consumer Society. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (1992). Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (1995). Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2009). Political ecology: From autonomous sphere to Basic Income. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1176.

  • Van Parijs, P. (2013). A green case for Basic income? In K. Widerquist, J. A. Noguera, J. De Wispelaere, & Y. Vanderborght (Eds.), Basic Income: An anthology of contemporary research (pp. 269–274). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2021). Climate change and the Covid-19 pandemic: Crucial pushes or deadly blows for basic income? In D. Rodenhäuser, H. Vetter, B. Held & H. Diefenbacher (Eds.), Soziale Sicherungssysteme im Umbruch. Beiträge zur socio-ökologischen Transformation (pp. 193–211). Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic Income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergragt, P., Akenji, L., & Dewick, P. (2014). Sustainable production, consumption, and livelihoods: Global and regional research perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63(Supplement C), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A. (2008). Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A., & Sers, M. R. (2018). The energy-emissions trap. Ecological Economics, 151, 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2016). Free money for all. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2003). The civic minimum: On the rights and obligations of economic citizenship. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist, K. (2017). The cost of Basic Income: Back-of-the-envelope calculations. Basic Income Studies, 12(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist, K. (2013). Independence, propertylessness, and Basic Income: A theory of freedom as the power to say no. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist, K., Noguera, J. A., Vanderborght, Y., & De Wispelaere, J. (2013). Basic Income: An anthology of contemporary research. Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. (2015). Incrementum ad absurdum: Global growth, inequality and poverty eradication in a carbon-constrained world. World Economic Review, 4, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA

    Michael W. Howard

  2. Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Jorge Pinto

  3. Freiburg Institute for Basic Income Studies, Freiburg, Germany

    Ulrich Schachtschneider

Authors
  1. Michael W. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrich Schachtschneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael W. Howard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK

    Malcolm Torry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Howard, M.W., Pinto, J., Schachtschneider, U. (2023). Ecological Effects of Basic Income. In: Torry, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41001-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41001-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41000-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41001-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation