Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Web 2.0 Salvage the Gains of Disability Rights Advocacy in Africa?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability and Media - An African Perspective

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

The attitudinal, institutional and environmental barriers recognised by the social model of disability continue to limit the effective participation in and full enjoyment of human rights for persons with disabilities. As such, disability rights activists in Africa must use a variety of tools to promote social inclusion and break down these barriers. As part of a coordinated effort and an effective mobilising tool, social media is well aligned with the principles of participatory development by enabling individuals to express their views on a specific issue concerning marginalised groups, such as persons with disabilities, to work together to rechannel their efforts and develop a sense of community. There has been limited success of disability rights causes that have effectively utilised these tools, which can enhance the involvement of people with disabilities in advocacy and present disability rights activists in Africa with an opportunity to make use of a variety of strategies to promote and advocate for social inclusion. However, social media alone are not sufficient for promoting disability inclusion but should be used to enhance traditional organising strategies. In addition to synthesising the literature across empirical and practical sources, examples from other movements in Africa that have taken advantage of these social media tools are provided to illustrate how such platforms can enhance disability advocacy efforts. The chapter examines how other groups have used social media to campaign for their issues in Africa to serve as a resource for the disability rights movement on ways to enhance advocacy efforts using social media as one of their tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allagui, I., & Kuebler, J. (2011). The Arab Spring and the Role of ICTs. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1435–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. (2017). The Social Power of Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghs, M., Chataika, T., El-Lahib, Y., & Dube, A. K. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Disability Activism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, S. (1996). The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship. Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford, S. (2000). Constructing Inequality: City Spaces and the Architecture of Citizenship. Political Theory, 28, 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T. (2016a). Twitter Activism and Youth in South Africa: The Case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, T. (2016b). Twitter and Participatory Citizenship:# FeesMustFall in South Africa. In Digital Activism in the Social Media Era (pp. 159-173). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, A. (2012). The Role of Social Media in Mobilizing Political Protest: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution. German Development Institute. Discussion Paper, 10(2012), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, H. (2011). The Revolution Will Be Digitised: Dispatches from the Information War. William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2017). The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Vol. 1). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. G. (2011). Hacker Politics and Publics. Public Culture, 23(3), 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, G. (2016). Scrutinizing Hashtag Activism in the# MustFall Protests in South Africa in 2015. In Digital Activism in the Social Media Era (pp. 175–193). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danspeckgruber, W. (2011, Spring). Introduction. In Princeton University (Ed.), Social Media Revolutions: All Hype or New Reality?.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, H. (2002). A Critical Examination of the Democratic Transition in South Africa: The Question of Public Participation. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 40(1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, N. (2019). The Tragedy of the Hidden Lamps: In Search of Disability Rights Activists from the Global South in the Digital Era. In M. Berghs, T. Chataika, Y. El-Lahib, & A. K. Dube (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Disability Activism (pp. 247–258). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eltantawy, N. (2013). From Veiling to Blogging: Women and Media in the Middle East. Feminist Media Studies, 13(5), 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A., & Sandoval, M. (Eds.). (2011). Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster, M. (2012). The Free Culture and 15M Movements in Spain: Composition, Social Networks and Synergies. Social Movement Studies, 11(3-4), 386–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2016). Rousing the Facebook Crowd: Digital Enthusiasm and Emotional Contagion in the 2011 Protests in Egypt and Spain. International Journal of Communication, 10, 254–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2011). Can an Algorithm Be Wrong? Twitter Trends, the Specter of Censorship, and Our Faith in the Algorithms Around Us. Culture Digitally. http://culturedigitally.org/2011/10/can-an-algorithm-be-wrong/

  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, L. (2012). Youth and Citizenship in the Digital Age: A View from Egypt. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honwana, A. M. (2013). Youth and Revolution in Tunisia. Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M. (Ed.). (2010). Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change (pp. 71–84). IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World Unite: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyva, R. (2017). Exploring UK Millennials’ Social Media Consumption Patterns and Participation in Elections, Activism, and “Slacktivism”. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and Activist New Media. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. (2013). Framing Bouazizi: ‘White Lies’, Hybrid Network, and Collective/Connective Action in the 2010–11 Tunisian Uprising. Journalism, 14(7), 921–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking Democracy? Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, J. (2012). Algorithms that Changed the Future: The Ingenious Ideas that Drive Today’s Computers. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R. (2009). Choosing Stereotypes: Debating the Efficacy of (British) Disability-Criticism. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006). Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E., Marques, I. C., & Holmes, C. (2014). Beyond Imported Magic. Essays on Science, Technology and Society in Latin America. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milan, S., & Trere, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond Data Universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2009). Downside to the Twitter Revolution. Dissent, 56(4), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). The Democratic Paradox. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutsvairo, B. (2016). Digital Activism in the Social Media Era: Critical Reflections on Emerging Trends in Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mutsvairo, B., & Sirks, L. A. (2015). Examining the Contribution of Social Media in Reinforcing Political Participation in Zimbabwe. Journal of African Media Studies, 7(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.7.3.329_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlela, M. N., & Mano, W. (2020). Social Media and Elections in Africa, Volume 1: Theoretical Perspectives and Election Campaigns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2017). Defining Impairment and Disability: Issues at Stake In Disability and Equality Law (pp. 3–18). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an Endless Meeting. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J. (2013). Democracy in an Age of Viral Reality: A Media Epidemio- Graphy of Spain’s Indignados Movement. Ethnography, 1–9. http://eth.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/10/08/1466138113502513.abstract

  • Postill, J. (2014). Freedom Technologists and the New Protest Movements: A Theory of Protest Formulas. Special Issue of Convergence Journal, 20(3). New Media, Global Activism and Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, D., & Casale, D. (2011). Political Participation of Africa’s Youth: Turnout, Partisanship and Protest. Working Paper No. 136. Afrobarometer. Retrieved January 13, 2020, from www.afrobarometer.org

  • Ryan, Y. (2011, January 26). How Tunisia’s Revolution Began. Al Jazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/01/2011126121815985483.html

  • Segerberg, A., & Lance Bennett, W. (2011). Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197–215. Retrieved January 15, 2020, from http://research.fit.edu/sealevelriselibrary/documents/doc_mgr/921/Segerberg_&_Bennett_2011_Twitter_to_explore_ecologies_of_CC_protests.pdf

  • Shakespeare, T. (1994). Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal? Disability and Society, 9(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, H. (2006). Media Portrayal of Mental Illness and Its Treatments. What Effect Does It Have on People with Mental Illness? Department of Community Health and Epidemiology. Queens University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2003). Why Societies need Dissent. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surman, M., & Reilly, K. (2003). Appropriating the Internet for Social Change: Towards the Strategic Use of Networked Technologies by Transnational Civil Society Organizations. Social Sciences Research Council. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://marksurman.commons.ca/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/Surman_2003_Appropriating_Internet_Social_Change.pdf

  • Tejerina, B., Perugorría, I., Benski, T., & Langman, L. (2013). From Indignation to Occupation: A New Wave of Global Mobilization. Current Sociology, 61(4), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest in Egypt: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1978). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior: The Roles of information. Opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying Forms of Online Activism: The Case of Cyberprotests Against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey & M. D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice (pp. 71–95). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalkauskaite, U. (2012). Crystallization of Disability Stereotypes in Lithuanian Media. Socialiniai Mokslai, 75(1), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National League of the Blind, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

    Nqobani Dube

Authors
  1. Nqobani Dube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Athena Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Tafadzwa Rugoho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dube, N. (2024). Can Web 2.0 Salvage the Gains of Disability Rights Advocacy in Africa?. In: Rugoho, T. (eds) Disability and Media - An African Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40885-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation