Skip to main content

Introduction: What We Talk About When We Talk About the Ethics of Engaging Patient and Community Stakeholders in Health Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Issues in Community and Patient Stakeholder–Engaged Health Research

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 146))

  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

Only somewhat recently has a specific literature emerged focused on the ethics of engaging patient and community stakeholders in health research. This literature is informed by a broad range of disciplinary frameworks and norms. It also overlaps with – and diverges from – traditional research ethics scholarship in interesting and important ways. This volume is an effort to bring together, in one place, important perspectives on the ethics of stakeholder engagement in health research. Here, ethics, patient and community stakeholders, and health-related research are all conceptualized broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. E., & Spellecy, R. (2021). Research that engages community and patient partners. In A. S. Iltis & D. MacKay (Eds.), Oxford handbook of research ethics. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Taylor, J., Dubé, K., Kuzmanović, D., Long, Y., & Marg, L. (2021). Ethical reflections on the conduct of HIV research with community members: A case study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. (2011). Principles of community engagement. US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (2008). The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. In The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 86–96). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, L., Bromley, E., & Khodyakov, D. (2013). Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), e7–e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html#xethical.

  • Reverby, S. M. (2012). Ethical failures and history lessons: The US Public Health Service research studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala. Public Health Reviews, 34(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. M., & Unruh, B. T. (2008). The hepatitis experiments at the Willowbrook State School. In The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 80–85). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavers, V. L., Lynch, C. F., & Burmeister, L. F. (2000). Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Journal of the National Medical Association, 92(12), 563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellecy, R., & Anderson, E. E. (2021). Patient and community engagement. In E. Bankert, B. Gordon, E. Hurley, & S. Shriver (Eds.), IRB management and function. Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2017). The theoretical, historical and practice roots of CBPR. In Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (pp. 17–29). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. F. (2010). The death of Jesse Gelsinger: New evidence of the influence of money and prestige in human research. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 36(2–3), 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily E. Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anderson, E.E. (2023). Introduction: What We Talk About When We Talk About the Ethics of Engaging Patient and Community Stakeholders in Health Research. In: Anderson, E.E. (eds) Ethical Issues in Community and Patient Stakeholder–Engaged Health Research. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40379-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics