Abstract
Against the approach narrowing down critical thinking as a narrow ‘skill’, which can be measured in terms of a reified idea of ‘efficiency’, the Paris Self-Managed Highschool or LAP (Lycée Autogéré de Paris) argues that critical thinking can only take place on the basis of democratic practices. It follows that LAP is embedded in the broader history of democratic education and is influenced by the theories of Brazilian educator Paulo Freire, notably by his critique of top-down ‘banking pedagogy’. For Freire, banking pedagogy is a decontextualized and authoritarian way of teaching in which students’ heads are empty ‘banks’ needed to be filled with ‘what is best for them’ from above. Through allowing for the self-management of the institution, in its mission statement, LAP intends to position itself as an integral part of the praxis of democratic education. How this unfolds on a daily basis will be the concern of the book, in which I carry out a critical ethnography that can be considered a ‘critical theory in action’, in line with the logic of critical pedagogic discourse. It is a critical praxis itself in so far as its goal is to reveal unfair relations of power hidden beneath the surface of what seems to be ‘given’, to take into account and acknowledge the critical expressions of different communities of practice as valid critique and to enact or inspire acts toward social justice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Académie de Paris. 2018. Projet Académique 2017-2020 de l’Académie de Paris. Paris: Académie de Paris.
Apple, Michael, and Luís Armando Gandin. 2003. Educating the state, democratizing knowledge: The citizen school project in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In The state and the politics of knowledge, ed. Michael Apple, 193–219. New York: Routledge.
Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Revised ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
———. 2003. The structuring of pedagogic discourse: IV, (class, codes and control). New York: Routledge.
Bidar, Abdennour, Denis Caroti, Rodrigue Coutouly, and Gérald Attali. 2019. Esprit Critique: Outils et Méthodes Pour Le Second Degré. Paris: Canopé.
Bloome, David, and Stephanie P. Carter. 2014. Microethnographic discourse analysis. In New methods of literacy research, ed. Peggy Albers, Teri Holbrook, and Amy Flint, 3–18. London: Routledge.
Bloome, David, Stephanie Power Carter, Beth Morton Christian, Sheila Otto, and Nora Shuart-Faris. 2004. Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. 1st ed. Mahwah: Routledge.
Bowen, Glenn. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9 (August): 27–40.
Fairclough, Norman, ed. 1992. Critical language awareness. Boston: Longman.
———, ed. 2001. Language and power. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
———, ed. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
———, ed. 2010. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Freire, Paulo. 1968. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Trans. M.B. Ramos. 2nd ed. London: Penguin.
Gay, Geneva. 2000. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Giroux, Henry A. 2001. Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. 2nd ed. Westport: Praeger.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. In Selections from the prison notebooks, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, Reprint ed. New York: International Publishers Co.
Hammersley, M. 1992. What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.
Kreisberg, Seth. 1992. Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. New York: SUNY Press.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2011. Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: Towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 231–238.
Legros, Bernard, and Jean-Noël Delplanque. 2009. L’enseignement Face à l’urgence Écologique. Brussels: Les Editions Aden.
Lycée Autogéré de Paris. 2012. Une Fabrique de Libertés: Le Lycée Autogéré de Paris. Paris: Editions REPAS.
———. 2014. Projet d’établissement 2014-2019. https://www.l-a-p.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Projet-d%C3%A9tablissement-LAP-2014-2019.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2023.
Madison, D. Soyini. 2005. Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. SAGE Publications.
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche. 2016. À l’école de l’esprit Critique. https://cache.media.eduscol.education.fr/file/Actu_2016/31/3/a_l_ecole_de_l_esprit_critique_680313.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2023.
Reed-Danahay, Deborah. 1995. Education and identity in rural France: The politics of schooling. In Cambridge studies in social and cultural anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, Brian V. 1995. Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York: Longman.
Tusting, Karin. 2013. Literacy studies as linguistic ethnography. Working papers in urban language and literacies. London: Kings College.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galiere, M. (2024). Introduction. In: Realities of Critical Pedagogy. Anthropological Studies of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40266-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40266-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40265-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40266-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)