Abstract
This chapter provides a summary of the key findings and highlights both the academic and non-academic implications of such findings. It draws attention to the limitations of the research and identifies where additional research is needed. Furthermore, it suggests some of the potential implications of the findings before discussing some concluding remarks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, P., & Collins, L. (2023). Creating and analysing a multimodal corpus of news texts with Google Cloud Vision’s automatic image tagger. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 100043.
Broyd, J., Boniface, L., Parsons, D., Murphy, D., & Hafferty, J. (2023). Incels, violence and mental disorder: A narrative review with recommendations for best practice in risk assessment and clinical intervention. BJPsych Advances, 29(4), 254–264.
Collins, L. C. (2019). Corpus linguistics for online communication: A guide for research. Routledge.
Daly, S. E., & Reed, S. M. (2022). “I think most of society hates us”: A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with incels. Sex Roles, 86(1), 14–33.
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2018). Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 233–273.
Gov.uk. (2020). Consultation outcome: Online harms white paper. Last accessed July, 2023, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper
Knight, D., & Adolphs, S. (2020). Multimodal corpora. In M. Paquot & S. T. Gries (Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 351–369). Springer.
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins Publishing.
Pelzer, B., Kaati, L., Cohen, K., & Fernquist, J. (2021). Toxic language in online incel communities. SN Social Sciences, 1(8), 1–22.
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2023). An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 3–21.
Solea, A., & Sugiura, L. (2023). Mainstreaming the blackpill: Understanding the incel community on TikTok. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29. 311–336
Speckhard, A., Ellenberg, M., Morton, J., & Ash, A. (2021). Involuntary celibates’ experiences of and grievance over sexual exclusion and the potential threat of violence among those active in an online incel forum. Journal of Strategic Security, 14(2), 89–121.
Sugiura, L. (2021). The incel rebellion: The rise of the manosphere and the virtual war against women. Emerald Prints.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins.
Uerpmann-Wittzack, R. (2010). Principles of international internet law. German Law Journal, 11(11), 1245–1263.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heritage, F. (2023). Conclusions, limitations, and future research. In: Incels and Ideologies. Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40184-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40184-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40183-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40184-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)