Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflexivity and the ethics of investigating incels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Incels and Ideologies

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality ((PSLGS))

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

On a rainy November morning in 2021, I had just finished an online call with a colleague. After a very intense meeting, I decided to treat myself to a nice cup of tea and a slice of cake. Coming downstairs from my office, I noticed that the post had arrived, and it included a large, but slim, brown envelope. This was strange because I was not expecting any mail. Looking at the postage stamp on the envelope, this had come from my University’s post room—clearly, something which I was not expecting had arrived at the post room of my work, and they had kindly redirected it to my house.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although Sorrenti has expressed views that I disagree with, her case is one which clearly highlights the extent to which members of the alt-right will go to doxx someone. The doxxing Sorrenti was subjected to was abhorrent.

References

  • Barber, K. (2021). Report on 8th BAAL SIG seminar: “Focus on the researcher: Dealing with distressing data”. BAAL Language and New Media SIG. Last accessed July, 2023, from https://langnewmedia.weebly.com/baal-sig-annual-seminar-on-distressing-data-14th-may-2021.html

  • Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2008). Feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis: A new theoretical and methodological approach? In K. Harrington, L. Litosseliti, H. Sauntson, & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender and language research methodologies (pp. 243–255). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2018). Women leaders and gender stereotyping in the UK press. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berez-Kroeker, A., McDonnell, B., Collister, L., & Koller, E. (2022). Data, data management, and reproducible research in linguistics: On the need for the open handbook of linguistic data management. In A. L. Berez-Kroeker, B. McDonnell, E. Koller, & L. B. Collister (Eds.), The open handbook of linguistic data management (pp. 3–8). MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bone, J., Emele, C. D., Abdul, A., Coghill, G., & Pang, W. (2016). The social sciences and the web: From ‘Lurking’ to interdisciplinary ‘Big Data’ research. Methodological Innovations, 9(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association for Applied Linguistics. (2021). Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics 2021 (4th ed.) British Association for Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coesemans, R., & De Cock, B. (2017). Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics, 116(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. C. (2019). Corpus linguistics for online communication: A guide for research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. (2021). Online extremism and terrorism research ethics: Researcher safety, informed consent, and the need for tailored guidelines. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(2), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, S. E., & Laskovtsov, A. (2021). “Goodbye, My Friendcels”: An analysis of incel suicide posts. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 11(1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I., Sterling, S., Lee, J., Li, W., & Rawal, H. (2021). Research tasks on ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 54(1), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, M. (2010). Not hearing things—Hearer/listener categories in polylogues. mediAzioni, 9(1), 177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2018). Informed consent in social sciences research: Ethical challenges. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(5), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, T., Atkins, S., Busso, L., & Petyko, M. (2021). Dealing with distressing data as a research Institute: A perspective from the Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics [Paper presentation]. BAAL New Media SIG: Focus on the Researcher: Dealing with Distressing Data. Cardiff, Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2006). On language and linguistics: Volume 3 (J. Webster, Ed.). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardaker, C., & McGlashan, M. (2016). “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, F. (2022). Name that community? Critical reflections on the ethics about disseminating research into online fetish communities. Journal of Positive Sexuality, 8(2), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, K. (2007). The epistemological bias of ethics review: Constraining mental health research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(6), 895–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaech, A., & Ostendorf, M. (2015). What your username says about you. In L. Màrquez, C. Callison-Burch, & J. Su (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 2032–2037). Association for Computational Linguistics.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B., & Daly, L. (2009). The ethics of conducting research with mental health service users. British Journal of Nursing, 18(5), 277–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2021). ‘It’s the subtle language that gets to you’: Understanding and managing researcher exposure to online child sexual grooming content [Paper presentation]. BAAL New Media SIG: Focus on the Researcher: Dealing with Distressing Data, Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, J. (2012). Dyke/Girl: Language and Identities in a Lesbian Group. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J. (2017). Identifying informational norms in Mumsnet talk: A reflexive-linguistic approach to internet research ethics. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, E. (2022). The linguistic data life cycle, sustainability of data, and principles of solid data management. In A. L. Berez-Kroeker, B. McDonnell, E. Koller, & L. B. Collister (Eds.), The open handbook of linguistic data management (pp. 61–71). MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Measuring the 21st century science and engineering workforce population: Evolving needs. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Naik, R. (2022). Trans activist celebrates rare victory against online trolls after Kiwi Farms deplatforming. CNN. Last accessed April, 2023, from https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/06/tech/kiwi-farms-clara-sorrenti-keffals/index.html

  • Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J., & Zappavigna, M. (2022). Researching language and social media: A student guide (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • REF2021. (2020). Index of revisions to the ‘Guidance on submissions’ (2019/01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. (2021). Plymouth shootings: What is an incel? An expert explains. The Independent. Last accessed April, 2023, from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/incel-meaning-movement-plymouth-shooting-b1903897.html

  • Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelytė, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., et al. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(4), e1007704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2021). Atrocious quotes—Researching pick-up artists and the seduction industry [Paper presentation]. BAAL New Media SIG: Focus on the Researcher: Dealing with Distressing Data, Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Wang, G., & Feng, H. (2021). Linguistic studies on social media: A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open, 11(3), 215824402110475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (2009). Consent as a grant of authority—A care ethics reading of informed consent. In H. Lindemann, M. Verkerk, & M. Urban Walker (Eds.), Naturalized bioethics—Toward responsible knowing and practice (pp. 182–198). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1(1), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing Twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Languages, Information, and Communications, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Frazer Heritage

Authors
  1. Frazer Heritage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frazer Heritage .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heritage, F. (2023). Reflexivity and the ethics of investigating incels. In: Incels and Ideologies. Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40184-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40184-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40183-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40184-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation